Dergiler / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Group comparison of individuals with and without irritable bowel syndrome in terms of psychological and lifestyle-related factors

Sayfa
13–23
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, assessing psychological factors in IBS interventions might be helpful in the prevention and treatment of IBS.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: In this study, we intended to explore group differences between individuals with and without irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in terms of psychological (i.e., perceived stress, internalizing problems, and difficulties in emotion regulation) and lifestyle-related factors (i.e., health-promoting behaviors and the frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study sample consisted of 105 individuals who met IBS based on Rome III Criteria and 105 healthy individuals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, assessing psychological factors in IBS interventions might be helpful in the prevention and treatment of IBS.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we intended to explore group differences between individuals with and without irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) in terms of psychological (i.e., perceived stress, internalizing problems, and difficulties in emotion regulation) and lifestyle-related factors (i.e., health-promoting behaviors and the frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption). Method: The data were collected using an online survey packet comprising demographic information form, Rome III Criteria for IBS, Health-Promoting Life-Style Profile II, Perceived Stress Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory, and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. The study sample consisted of 105 individuals who met IBS based on Rome III Criteria and 105 healthy individuals. Results: The group comparisons showed that IBS is positively associated with being female, perceived stress level, internalizing problems (i.e., depression, anxiety, and somatization), and some difficulties in emotion regulation (i.e., strategy and impulse). However, IBS was not associated with age, perceived income level, the frequency of smoking and alcohol consumption, and health-promoting behaviors (i.e., physical activity and nutrition). Conclusion: Overall, the results suggest that IBS might be more related to psychological factors than healthy lifestyle factors. Thus, assessing psychological factors in IBS interventions might be helpful in the prevention and treatment of IBS.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SELVİ, K., BOZO, Ö. (2022). Group comparison of individuals with and without irritable bowel syndrome in terms of psychological and lifestyle-related factors. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 13–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/493697

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Blanchard EB, Lackner JM, Jaccard J, Rowell D, Carosella AM, Powell C, et al. The role of stress in symptom exacerbation among IBS patients. J Psychosom Res 2008; 64:119-128
  2. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Global prevalence of and risk factors for irritable bowel syndrome: A meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 10:712-721
  3. Drossman DA, Li Z, Andruzz E, Temple R, Talley NJ, Thompson WG, et al. U.S. householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders. Dig Dis Sci 1993; 38:1560-1580
  4. Spiegel BMR. The burden of IBS: Looking at metrics. Cur Gastroenterol Rep 2009; 11:265-269
  5. Hahn BA, Kirchdoerfer LJ, Fullerton S, Mayer E. Patientperceived severity of irritable bowel syndrome in relation to symptoms, health resource utilization and quality of life. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1997; 11:553-559
  6. Gralnek IM, Hays RD, Kilbourne A, Naliboff B, Mayer EA. The impact of irritable bowel syndrome on health-related quality of life. Gastroenterology 2000; 119:654-660
  7. World Gastroenterology Organisation. World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines. Irritable bowel syndrome: A global perspective 2015. https://www.spg.pt/wp-content/ uploads/2015/11/2015-IBS.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2020
  8. Lovell RM, Ford AC. Effects of gender on prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in the community: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 107:991-1000
  9. Dancey CP, Taghavi M, Fox RJ. The relationship between daily stress and symptoms of irritable bowel: A time-series approach. J Psychosom Res 1998; 44:537-545
  10. Fava GA, Pavan L. Large bowel disorders: I. Illness configuration and life events. Psychother Psychosom 1976; 27:93-99
  11. Popa S, Dimitrascu DL. Job stress in irritable bowel syndrome. J Psychosom Res 2015; 78:619
  12. Walker EA, Katon WJ, Jemelka RP, Roy-Bryne PP. Comorbidity of gastro-intestinal complaints, depression, and anxiety in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area (ECA) Study. Am J Med 1992; 92:26S–30S
  13. Arsiè E, Coletta M, Cesana BM, Basilisco G. Symptom-association probability between meal ingestion and abdominal pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. Does somatization play a role? Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27:416–422
  14. Choung RS, Locke GR, Zinsmeister AR, Schleck CD, Talley NJ. Psychosocial distress and somatic symptoms in community subjects with irritable bowel syndrome: A psychological component is the rule. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104:1772- 1779
  15. Ohlsson B. The role of smoking and alcoho