Dergiler / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2

Predictors of social functioning in people with antisocial personality disorder

Sayfa
93–100
Yayın Tarihi
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results were compared with the literature data.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Although much research has been performed in defining and diagnosing the antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and its etiology, very few data about the predictors of social functioning (SF) in ASPD are available.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Method: In this study, we included 220 people with ASPD.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results were compared with the literature data.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Although much research has been performed in defining and diagnosing the antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) and its etiology, very few data about the predictors of social functioning (SF) in ASPD are available. Acceptance and commitment therapy is a third-wave psychotherapy which puts the psychological inflexibility model at the heart of its psychopathology model. According to this model, experiential avoidance, cognitive fusion, and attachment to conceptualized self are three processes that are related to psychological inflexibility. Method: In this study, we included 220 people with ASPD. We investigated possible predictive effects of experiential avoidance (measured with Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II), cognitive fusion (measured with Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire), attachment to conceptualized self (measured with Self-as-Context Scale), symptom severity (measured with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-II), and perspective taking (measured with Interpersonal Reactivity Index) on SF (measured with Social Functioning Scale) in people with ASPD. We conducted regression analyses to determine possible predictive effects. Results: Our model explained 14% of the cases. ASPD severity, lower attachment to conceptualized self, and cognitive fusion were found to predict SF but perspective taking and experiential avoidance did not. Conclusion: Other than symptom severity, self-as-context and cognitive fusion were found to predict SF in people with ASPD. Results were compared with the literature data.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAHİN, O., NALBANT, A., YAVUZ, K. F. (2022). Predictors of social functioning in people with antisocial personality disorder. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 2, 93–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/649800

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders. Fifth ed., Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2013
  2. Gibbon S, Khalifa NR, Cheung NHY, Völlm BA, McCarthy L. Psychological interventions for antisocial personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020; 9:CD007668
  3. Weissman MM. The assessment of social adjustment: a review of techniques. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1975; 32:357-365
  4. Bosc M. Assessment of social functioning in depression. Compr Psychiatry 2000; 41:63-69
  5. Ellis PL. Empathy: A factor in antisocial behavior. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1982; 10:123-133
  6. Eisenberg N. Altruistic Cognition, Emotion, and Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1986
  7. Eisenberg N, Eggum ND, Di Giunta L. Empathy-related responding: Associations with prosocial behavior, aggression, and intergroup relations. Soc Issues Policy Rev 2010; 4:143-180
  8. Barnett G, Mann RE. Empathy deficits and sexual offending: A model of obstacles to empathy. Aggress Violent Behav 2013; 18:228-239
  9. Colman AM. Oxford dictionary psychology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2009
  10. Cuff BMP, Brown SJ, Taylor L, Howat DJ. Empathy: A review of the concept. Emot Rev 2016; 8:144-153
  11. Davis MH. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44:113
  12. Yavuz KF, Şahin O, Ulusoy S, Ipek OU, Kurt E. Experiential avoidance, empathy, and anger-related attitudes in antisocial personality disorder. Turkish J Med Sci 2016; 46:1792-1800
  13. Vilardaga R, Hayes SC, Levin ME, Muto T. Creating a strategy for progress: A contextual behavioral science approach. Behav Anal 2009; 32:105-133
  14. Biglan A, Glasgow RE, Singer G. The need for a science of larger social units: A contextual approach. Behav Ther 1990; 21:195- 215
  15. Biglan A. The nurture effect: How the Science of Human Behavior Can Improve Our Lives and Our World. Oakland, California: New Harbinger Publications, 2015
  16. Levin ME, Luoma JB, Vilardaga R, Lillis J, Nobles R, Hayes SC. Examining the role of psychological inflexibility, perspective taking, and empathic concern in generalized prejudice. J Appl Soc Psychol 2016; 46:180-191
  17. Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav Ther 2004; 35:639-665
  18. Barnes-Holmes Y, McHugh L, Barnes-Holmes D. Perspective- taking and theory of mind: a relational frame account. Behav Ana