Dergiler / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Response styles and avoidance strategies in bipolar disorder and healthy controls: A comparative study

Sayfa
24–33
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our results present new perspectives for psychotherapeutic interventions both for the treatment and for the improvement of the functioning of these patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to investigate stress appraisals, rumination, worry, and experiential avoidance (EA) in patients with bipolar disorder-I (BD-I) in the euthymic phase of the illness.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Method: Using the Stress Appraisal Measure Dispositional Form (SAM-D), Ruminative Thinking Style Questionnaire (RTSQ), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), we compared 67 BD-I patients with 70 healthy controls.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our results present new perspectives for psychotherapeutic interventions both for the treatment and for the improvement of the functioning of these patients.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate stress appraisals, rumination, worry, and experiential avoidance (EA) in patients with bipolar disorder-I (BD-I) in the euthymic phase of the illness. The effects of these processes on functionality in individuals with BD-I are also investigated. Method: Using the Stress Appraisal Measure Dispositional Form (SAM-D), Ruminative Thinking Style Questionnaire (RTSQ), Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II), we compared 67 BD-I patients with 70 healthy controls. Additionally, multiple linear regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of functionality levels measured by the Bipolar Disorder Functioning Questionnaire (BDFQ). Results: BD-I group showed significantly higher SAM-D “threat,” “uncontrollable by anyone,” and “control by others” scores. The BD-I group also reported higher EA (AAQ-II) than the control group. Rumination (RTSQ) and worry (PSWQ) did not show any significant differences between groups. BDFQ was negatively predicted “uncontrollable by anyone” and positively predicted by “control by others” subdimensions of SAM-D. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that patients with BD-I have differences in stress appraisals, even in the euthymic phase. Higher AAQ-II scores seemed to be a distinctive feature for patients with BD-I that may be related to perceiving stressful situations as threatening and uncontrollable. Our results present new perspectives for psychotherapeutic interventions both for the treatment and for the improvement of the functioning of these patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ULUSOY, S., YAVUZ, K. F., ERKIRAN, M. (2022). Response styles and avoidance strategies in bipolar disorder and healthy controls: A comparative study. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 24–33. https://ajindex.com/articles/493696

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-IV-TR (Text Revision). Fourth ed., Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000 2. Gitlin MJ, Swendsen J, Heller TL, Hammen C. Relapse and impairment in bipolar disorder. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:1635- 1640. 3. Hammen C, Gitlin M, Altshuler L. Predictors of work adjustment in Bipolar I patients: A naturalistic longitudinal follow-up. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68:220-225. 4. Neale JM. Defensive functions of manic episodes. In: Oltmanns TF, Maher BA (editors). Delusional Beliefs. New York: John Wiley Sons, 1988, 138-156. 5. Lyon HM, Startup M, Bentall RP. Social cognition and the manic defense: Attributions, selective attention, and self-schema in bipolar affective disorder. J Abnorm Psychol 1999; 108:273-282. 6. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Seligman MEP, Girgus JS. Sex differences in unipolar depression: evidence and theory background on the affective disorders. Psychol Bull 1987; 101:259-282 7. Nolen-Hoeksema S. Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991; 100:569-582. 8. Thomas J, Bentall RP. Hypomanic traits and response styles to depression. Br J Clin Psychol 2002; 41:309-314. 9. Thomas J, Knowles R, Tai S, Bentall RP. Response styles to depressed mood in bipolar affective disorder. J Affect Disord 2007; 100:249-252. 10. Lam D, Wong G. Prodromes, coping strategies, insight and social functioning in bipolar affective disorders. Psychol Med 1997; 27:1091-1100. 11. Sibrava NJ, Borkovec TD. The Cognitive Avoidance Theory of Worry. In: Worry and its Psychological Disorders: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. 2008. 12. Borkovec TD, Alcaine OM, Behar E. Avoidance theory of worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. In: Heimberg R, Turk C, Mennin D (editors). Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Advances in Research and Practice. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press, 2004, 77-108. 13. Borkovec TD, Newman MG. Worry and Generalized Anxiety Disorder. In: Bellack A.S, Hersen M, Salkovskis P (editors.). Comprehensive Clinical Psychology. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1998, 439-459. 14. Starcevic V. Pathological worry in major depression: A preliminary report. Behav Res Ther 1995; 33:55-56. 15. Kertz SJ, Bigda-Peyton JS, Rosmarin DH, Björgvinsson T. The importance of worry across diagnostic presentations: Prevalence, severity and associated symptoms in a partial hospital setting. J Anxiety Disord 2012; 26:126-133. 16. Grube