KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Exploring the Turkish Concept İrkil-: Corpus-driven Cognitive and Lexical Profiling of a Pre-emotion

Muhammet Fatih ADIGÜZEL
Yeşim AKSAN
Sayfa
428–454
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study also allowed us to place the pre-emotion irkil- in the right place in the cognitive appraisal pattern for fear prepared by Scherer (2001).

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:As a multi-disciplinary study about irkil- (get startled), which combines findings from psychology, cognitive and corpus linguistics, the article aims to identify the lexical profile and cognitive structure of this pre-emotion through its concordances from the TNC.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The corpus data demonstrated the schematic nature of irkil- dictates specific lexical environments with collocates from certain semantic domains, which also affect its prosody.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study also allowed us to place the pre-emotion irkil- in the right place in the cognitive appraisal pattern for fear prepared by Scherer (2001).
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2001 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:irkil · startle reflex · corpus-driven

Özet

As a multi-disciplinary study about irkil- (get startled), which combines findings from psychology, cognitive and corpus linguistics, the article aims to identify the lexical profile and cognitive structure of this pre-emotion through its concordances from the TNC. We employed model of extended lexical units, which involves identifying irkil’s typical collocates, colligates, semantic preferences and discourse prosodies. As part of its event schema, irkil- was found to have a linguistic schema to be filled by certain paradigmatic and syntagmatic choices. We found typical collocates of irkil- are determined by the experiencer’s pre-startle situation (engrossment/absence), sudden stimuli of acoustic, tactile, visual and cognitive natures, post-startle behavioural tendencies characterised by hypervigilance, and the ensuing emotion – fear, surprise or anger. The corpus data demonstrated the schematic nature of irkil- dictates specific lexical environments with collocates from certain semantic domains, which also affect its prosody. The study also allowed us to place the pre-emotion irkil- in the right place in the cognitive appraisal pattern for fear prepared by Scherer (2001).

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ADIGÜZEL, M. F., AKSAN, Y. (2022). Exploring the Turkish Concept İrkil-: Corpus-driven Cognitive and Lexical Profiling of a Pre-emotion. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 428–454. https://ajindex.com/articles/488678

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Adıgüzel, M.F. (2018). Corpus-driven lexical profiles of Turkish fear verbs and metaphorical profiles of somatic fear idioms in Turkish (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation), Mersin University, Mersin. Aksan, Y., Duran, N., Ersen, D., Hızarcı, Ç., Korkmaz, S., Sever, B. & Sezer, T. (2008). Türkçede yakın anlamlı sözcükler: Bir derlem çalışması. 22.Ulusal Dilbilim Kurultayı Bildirileri, Van. 558-567
  2. Alan, K. (2001) Natural Language Semantics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford Amodio, D. M., and Harmon-Jones, E.(2011). Trait emotions and affective modulation of the startle eyeblink: On the unique relationship of trait anger. Emotion. 11 (1), 47–51.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Volume 2, Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books. Darwin, C. R. (1965). The expression of emotions in man and animals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (originally published in 1872). Ekman, P, Levenson, R.W., and Friesen, W.V. (1983). Autonomic nervous system activity distinguishes between emotions. Science 221, 1208–1210
  4. Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99(3), 550–553.
  5. Ellsworth, P. C., and Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (eds), Handbook of affective sciences, (pp.572-595). New York/Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press Ersoylu, H. (2011). Eş anlamlılık mı, yabancı kaynaklı karşılık oluş mu? Türk Dili, Mart 250-256,
  6. TDK Yay. Ankara.
  7. Göksel, A. and Kerslake, C. (2005). Turkish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. Izard, C. (1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation. Izard, C. E. (2007). Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas, and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2(3), 260–280.
  8. Johnson-Laird, P. N. and Oatley, K. (1992). Basic emotions, rationality, and folk theory. Cognition and emotion, 6:3-4, 201-223
  9. Kövecses, Z. (1990). Emotion concepts. New York: Springer. Lazarus, R.S. (1991).
  10. Emotion and adaptation. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  11. Lewis, M. (2008). The emergence of human emotions. In M. Lewis, J. Haviland-Jones & L. Feldman Barret (eds). Handbook of emotions, 3rd edition, (pp.304-319), New York: The Guilford Press Louw, B. (2000). Contextual Prosodic Theory: bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Chris Heffer and Helen Sauntson (eds.), Words in context. In honour of John Sinclair. Birmingham: ELR, (pp.48–94)
  12. McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, theory and p