This pre-implementation stage has helped us find answers to the following questions: (a) To what extent do the empirically scaled descriptors in the banks of descriptors available across Europe reflect the needs of the ESP students? (b) Do we need to develop more descriptors for ESP learners at finer levels and for different needs?
📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale
🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper reports on the p re-implementation stage of an ELP study for the ESP learners and the ways to develop the self- assessment checklists for that implementation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Conducting a target situation analysis, identifying the actions that might take place in their works, finding out the related needs in these actions, and selecting the available descriptors from the 'Bank of Descriptors for S elf-Assessment in ELP' in order to develop self-assessment checklists were the phases that occurred within the process of this development.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This pre-implementation stage has helped us find answers to the following questions: (a) To what extent do the empirically scaled descriptors in the banks of descriptors available across Europe reflect the needs of the ESP students? (b) Do we need to develop more descriptors for ESP learners at finer levels and for different needs?
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri
Abstract
This paper reports on the p re-implementation stage of an ELP study for the ESP learners and the ways to develop the self- assessment checklists for that implementation. Conducting a target situation analysis, identifying the actions that might take place in their works, finding out the related needs in these actions, and selecting the available descriptors from the 'Bank of Descriptors for S elf-Assessment in ELP' in order to develop self-assessment checklists were the phases that occurred within the process of this development. This pre-implementation stage has helped us find answers to the following questions: (a) To what extent do the empirically scaled descriptors in the banks of descriptors available across Europe reflect the needs of the ESP students? (b) Do we need to develop more descriptors for ESP learners at finer levels and for different needs?
🔖
Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap
ARİFİ, Q., ŞAHİNKARAKAŞ, Ş. (2022). The CEFR and the Needs of the ESP Students. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 34, 83–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/484831
The Common European Framework in its political and educational context (s.a.)- Retrieved on January 12, 2005 from the Council of Europe website: http://culture2.coe.int/portfolio/documents/052180 3136txt.pdf Kohonen, V. 2000. Student reflection in portfolio assessment; making language learning more visible. Babylonia 1,13-16.
Lenz, P. & G. Schneider 2002. Developing the Swill model of the European Language Portfolio. In Council of Europe, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment: Case Studies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Lenz, P. & G. Schneider. 2004a. Introduction to the bank of descriptors for self-assessment in European Language Portfolios. Retrieved on January 15, 2007 from www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/documents/Introduct ion descriptor.doc. Lenz, P. & G. Schneider 2004b. A bank of descriptors for self-assessment in European Language Portfolio. Council of Europe, Language Division. Retrieved on January 23, 2007 from www. coe.int/portfolio Little, D. 2006. The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teacher 39, 167- 190. Little, D & R. Perclova 2001. European Language Portfolio: A guide for teachers and teacher trainers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Retrieved on March 11, 2005 from http://www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/?L=E&M=/m ain pages/documents.html. North, B. 2002. Developing descriptor scales of language proficiency for the CEF common reference levels. In Council of Europe, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment: Case Studies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Scharer, R. 2005. European Language Portfolio: Interim Report 2005 with Executive Summary. Language Policy Division: Strasbourg. Retrieved on May 8, 2006 from www.coe.int/T/DG4/Portfolio/documents/Interimr eportQ5.doc Schneider, G. & P. Lenz 2001. European Language Portfolio: Guide for Developers. Council of Europe: Strasbourg. Retrieved on April 19, 2005 from www.coe.int/portfolio>Documentation