Dergiler / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2022 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

Potential Nutritive Value and Anti-Methanogenic Potential of Pomegranate Peel for Sheep

Sayfa
387–391
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However before large implication, there is a need for in vivo experiment to test the mitigating effect of PP samples.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of the current experiment was to determine potential nutritive value and anti-methanogenic potential of pomegranate peels obtained from 12 different pomegranate fruits in Turkiye.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There are significant variations among pomegranate peel (PP) samples in terms of chemical composition, gas production, methane production, metabolisable energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However before large implication, there is a need for in vivo experiment to test the mitigating effect of PP samples.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Pomegranate peel · Chemical composition · Digestibility

Abstract

The aim of the current experiment was to determine potential nutritive value and anti-methanogenic potential of pomegranate peels obtained from 12 different pomegranate fruits in Turkiye. There are significant variations among pomegranate peel (PP) samples in terms of chemical composition, gas production, methane production, metabolisable energy (ME) and organic matter digestibility (OMD). The crude ash (CA), ether extract (EE), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF) and condensed tannin (CT) contents of PP samples ranged from 2.99 to 4.72%, 2.11 to 5.25 %, 2.53 and 6.36%, 20.79 to 27.29%, 11.71 and 17.96%, 0.79 to 3.39% respectively. Gas production and CH4 production of PP samples ranged from 41.07 to 57.22, 5.29 and 7.87 respectively whereas percentage of CH4 ranged from 12.51 and 14.03%. The ME and OMD of PP samples ranged from 7.92 to 10.84 MJ/kg and 54.43 to 68.95% respectively. Although PP samples studied in the current experiment have the low CH4 reduction potentials, the CP contents of PP samples are not sufficient to meet minimum level of CP requirement for sheep. Therefore protein supplementation is required for optimum rumen function and feed intake in ruminant animals when large amount of PP samples were included into ruminant diets. However before large implication, there is a need for in vivo experiment to test the mitigating effect of PP samples.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜVEN, İ., KAMALAK, A., ÖZKAN, Ç. Ö. (2022). Potential Nutritive Value and Anti-Methanogenic Potential of Pomegranate Peel for Sheep. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 387–391. https://ajindex.com/articles/478201

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. AOAC. 1990. Official method of analysis. 15th ed., Association of official analytical chemists, Washington, DC, US, pp: 66-88.
  2. Barry TN, Manley TR, Duncan JS. 1984. The role of condensed tannins in the nutritional value of Lotus pedunculatus for sheep intake. Brit J Nutr, 51: 485-491.
  3. Bhatta R, Saravanan M, Baruah L, Sampath KT, Prasad CS. 2013. Effect of plant secondary compounds on in vitro methane, ammonia production and ruminal protozoa population. J Appl Microbiol, 115: 455-465.
  4. Bodas R, Prieto N, Garcia-Gonzalez R, Andres S, Giraldez FJ, Lopez S. 2012. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 176: 78-93.
  5. Canbolat O, Kamalak A, Kara H. 2014. The effects of urea supplementation on pomegranate pulp (Punica granatum L.) silage fermentation, aerobic stability and in vitro gas production. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg, 61(3): 217-223.
  6. Elmorsy AM, Shoukry MM, Soliman SM, Soliman MM. 2022. Influence of using pomegranate peel silage in rations of dairy cows on their productive performance. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences 12: 074-095.
  7. Galindo J, Gonzalez N, Delgado D, Sosa A, Marrero Y, Gonzalez R, Moreira O. 2008. Efecto modulador de Leucaena leucocephala sobre la microbiota ruminal. Zoot Trop, 26(3): 249-252.
  8. Genç S, Soysal Mİ. 2018. Parametric and nonparametric post hoc tests. BSJ Eng Sci, 1(1): 18-27.
  9. Goel G, Makkar HP, Becker K. 2008. Effects of Sesbania sesban and Carduus pycnocephalus leaves and Fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graecum L.) seeds and their extracts on partitioning of nutrients from roughage-and concentrate- based feeds to methane. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 147(1-3): 72-89.
  10. Goel G, Puniya AK, Aguilar CN, Singh K. 2005. Interaction of gut microflora with tannins in feeds. Naturwissenschaften, 92(11): 497-503.
  11. Hatami A, Alipour D, Hozhabri F, Tabatabaei M. 2015. The effect of different inclusion levels of polyethylene glycol as a silage additive on ensilage characteristics of pomegranate peel and in vitro rumen fermentation. Span J Agric Res, 13(2): e06SC01-e06SC01. Hixson JL, Jacobs JL, Wilkes EN, Smith PA. 2016. Survey of the variation in grape marc condensed tannin composition and concentration and analysis of key compositional factors. J Agric Food Chem, 64: 7076-7086.
  12. Jami E, Shabtay A, Nikbachat M, Yosef E, Miron J, Mizrahi I. 2012. Effects of adding a concentrated pomegranate-residue extract to the ration of lactating cows on in vivo diges