Dergiler / Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Microbiological Profiles of Diabetic Foot Infections at a Tertiary Hospital

Sayfa
44–49
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is extremely important in the management of infections to detect regional pathogens and susceptibility patterns and initiate empirical treatment by considering potentially influential factors.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Diabetic foot wounds impair the quality of life of patients and may progress to amputation with the developing infection.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection and underwent surgical procedures in the orthopedics and traumatology clinic between January 2019 and March 2021 were retrospectively searched from the hospital database.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is extremely important in the management of infections to detect regional pathogens and susceptibility patterns and initiate empirical treatment by considering potentially influential factors.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Diabetic foot wounds impair the quality of life of patients and may progress to amputation with the developing infection. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the microbiological profiles and antibiotic susceptibility of diabetic foot infections in this context. Methods: Patients who were hospitalized with the diagnosis of diabetic foot infection and underwent surgical procedures in the orthopedics and traumatology clinic between January 2019 and March 2021 were retrospectively searched from the hospital database. Results: A total of 71 patients were included in the study. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common cause of the infections (66.7%). The highest rate of culture growth was found in Klebsiella pneumoniae as 23.5%, followed by Escherichia coli as 19.8%. The Wagner Grade 4 classification was the most common grade in our patients. The extended-spectrum beta-lactamase rate of the K. pneumoniae isolates was the highest as 57.9%. There was meropenem resistance in 31.6% (n = 6) of the Klebsiella strains, 75% (n = 3) of the Acinetobacter strains, and 33.3% (n = 2) of the Pseudomonas strains. The methicillin resistance rate was 50% in the Staphylococcus aureus strains. Major amputation was performed in 88.7% of the patients, with a post-surgical mortality rate of 9.9%. Conclusion: Diabetic foot ulcers is an important risk factor for extremity loss and can lead to morbidity and mortality. The increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance in our country is a concern. It is extremely important in the management of infections to detect regional pathogens and susceptibility patterns and initiate empirical treatment by considering potentially influential factors.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, Ö., ÇELİK, A. (2022). Evaluation of Microbiological Profiles of Diabetic Foot Infections at a Tertiary Hospital. Cerrahpaşa Medical Journal, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 1, 44–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/473102

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. 2019. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/, Accessed August 24, 2021
  2. Lipsky BA, Aragón-Sánchez J, Diggle M, et al. IWGDF guidance on the diagnosis and management of foot infections in persons with diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016;32(1)(suppl 1):45-74. [CrossRef] 3. Noor S, Khan RU, Ahmad J. Understanding diabetic foot infection and its management. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017;11(2):149-156. [CrossRef] 4. Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA. 2005;293(2):217-228. [CrossRef] 5. Grigoropoulou P, Eleftheriadou I, Jude EB, Tentolouris N. Diabetic foot infections: an Update in diagnosis and management. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(1):3. [CrossRef] 6. Chastain CA, Klopfenstein N, Serezani CH, Aronoff DM. A clinical review of diabetic foot infections. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2019;36(3):381-395. [CrossRef] 7. Paulson A, Kumar KK, Panayappan L, Mathew L. Diabetic foot infection and its management: a review. GSC Biol Pharm Sci. 2018;4(1):19-24
  3. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Cornia PB, et al. 2012 Infectious Diseases Society of America clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(12):e13 2-e173. [CrossRef] 9. Wagner FW Jr. The dysvascular foot: a system for diagnosis and treatment. Foot Ankle. 1981;2(2):64-122. [CrossRef] 10. Kateel R, Augustine AJ, Prabhu S, Ullal S, Pai M, Adhikari P. Clinical and microbiological profile of diabetic foot ulcer patients in a tertiary care hospital. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2018;12(1):27-30. [CrossRef] 11. Al-Rubeaan K, Al Derwish M, Ouizi S, et al. Diabetic foot complications and their risk factors from a large retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0124446. [CrossRef] 12. Dinh T, Veves A. The influence of gender as a risk factor in diabetic foot ulceration. Wounds. 2008;20(5):127-131
  4. Nikoloudi M, Eleftheriadou I, Tentolouris A, Kosta OA, Tentolouris N. Diabetic foot infections: update on management. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018;20(10):40. [CrossRef] 14. Uçkay I, Gariani K, Pataky Z, Lipsky BA. Diabetic foot infections: state-of-the-art. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16(4):305-316. [CrossRef] 15. Saltoglu N, Yemisen M, Ergonul O, et al. Predictors for limb loss among patient with diabetic foot infections: an observational retrospective multicentric study in Turkey. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(7):659-664. [CrossRef] 16. Kara Z, Ör