KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

The Impact Degrees of Basic Parameters on Repair Performance in Composite Patch Applications

Halit DOĞAN
Memet ZOR
Sefa Burak YÜCEL
Mustafa KARAMOLLA
Sayfa
187–191
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The second most effective parameter is patch configuration;the patch sizes have much less impact degree.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, for composite patch repairs, the impact degrees of patch configuration and patch sizes onrepair performance were determined and compared with each other.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The criterion that determines the impact degrees of the examined parameterswas accepted to be the reduction rate in the SIF values.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The second most effective parameter is patch configuration;the patch sizes have much less impact degree.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this study, for composite patch repairs, the impact degrees of patch configuration and patch sizes onrepair performance were determined and compared with each other. First, stress intensity factor (SIF)values were calculated by using the Finite Element Method for tensile loading in an aluminum plate withcenter cracks, in unpatched situation. In this model, the repair was made by forming single and doublesided patches and adhesive volumes too. The SIF values are recalculated for different patch thicknesses,widths, and crack lengths. The criterion that determines the impact degrees of the examined parameterswas accepted to be the reduction rate in the SIF values. The results show that even the mostdisadvantageous patch application contributes significantly to the repair performance and that theapplication itself is the most effective factor. The second most effective parameter is patch configuration;the patch sizes have much less impact degree.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DOĞAN, H., ZOR, M., YÜCEL, S. B., KARAMOLLA, M. (2022). The Impact Degrees of Basic Parameters on Repair Performance in Composite Patch Applications. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 187–191. https://ajindex.com/articles/472194

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Liu, X., Wang, G. 2007. Progressive failure analysis of bonded composite repairs. Composite Structure; 81: 331–340.
  2. Charalambides, M.N, Hardouin, R, Kinloch, A.J, Matthews, F.L. 1998. Adhesively-bonded repairs to fibre-composite materials. Experimental, Composite Part A; (I): 1371–1381.
  3. Hu, F.Z, Soutis, C. 2000. Strength prediction of patch-repaired CFRP laminates loaded in compression. Composite Science Technology; 60: 1103–1114.
  4. Gong, X.-J, Cheng, P, Rousseau, J, Aivazzadeh S. Effect of Local Stresses on Static Strength and Fatigue Life of Patched Composite Panels, 16th International Conferance Composite Materials, Kyoto, Japan, 2007, pp 1–7. Marín, J.C, Barroso, A, París, F, Cañas, J. 2009. Study of fatigue damage in wind turbine blades. Engineering Failure Analaysis; 16: 656–668.
  5. Campilho, R.D.S.G, Moura, M.F.S.F, Pinto, A.M.G, Morais, J.J.L, Domingues, J.J.M.S. 2009. Modelling the tensile fracture behaviour of CFRP scarf repairs. Composite Part B Engineering; 40: 149–157.
  6. Breitzman, T.D, Iarve, E.V, Cook, B.M, Lipton, R.P, Rouge, B. Optimum Design a Composite Scarf Repair Patch Under Uniaxial Tensile Load, 17th International Conference on Composite Materials 2009,
  7. Edinburgh, İskoçya, 2009, pp 1–10.
  8. Wang, Q.Y, Pidaparti, R.M. 2002. Static characteristics and fatigue behavior of composite-repaired aluminum plates. Composite Structure; 56: 151–155.
  9. Belhouari, M, Bachir Bouiadjra, B, Megueni, A, Kaddouri, K. 2004. Comparison of double and single bonded repairs to symmetric composite structures: A numerical analysis. Composite Structure; 65: 47–53.
  10. Kumar, A.M, Ripudaman, S. 3D Finite Element Modelling of a Composite Patch Repair, 9th International Conference in Fracture, (ICF9), Sydney, Australia, 1997, pp 215–216
  11. Yang, C, Huang, H, Tomblin, J.S, Sun, W. 2004. Elastic - Plastic Model of a dhesive–bonded single-lap composite joints. Journal of Composite Material; 38: 293–309.
  12. Baldan, A. 2004. Adhesively-bonded joints and repairs in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: Adhesives, adhesion theories and surface pretreatment. Journal Material Science: 39:1-49.
  13. Campilho, R.D.S.G, Moura, M.F.S.F, Domingues, J.J.M.S. 2005. Modelling single and double-lap repairs on composite materials. Composite Science Technology; 69: 1948–1958.
  14. Okafor, A.C, Bhogapurapu, H. 2006. Design and analysis of adhesively bonded thick composite patch repair of corrosion grind-out and cracks on 2024 T3 clad aluminum aging aircraft structures. Composite Structure; 76: 138–150.