Dergiler / Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi / 1998 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 42

British Policy On The Fate Of Constantinople And The Allıed Occupatıon Of The Cıty On March 16,1920

What has been done and what has not been done in 75 years?

Sayfa
836–869
Yayın Tarihi
1998-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Combined with the British desire to end the continuance of Turkish power as an effective administration in any part of Europe, David Lloyd George, the Prime Minister of the British coalition govemment, followed a policy for the expulsion of the Turks from Constantinople, even though there was a great degree of opposition within his own cabinet.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Great Britain's policy aims after World War I towards the defeated Ottoman Empire markedly included that wherever Armenians, Kurds, Greeks and Arabs constituted a majority Turkish rule must cease, and that the Turkish Capital and the Straits must be taken from Turkish control to secure a free road to her far-flung dominions in Asia, India in particular*1.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Great Britain's policy aims after World War I towards the defeated Ottoman Empire markedly included that wherever Armenians, Kurds, Greeks and Arabs constituted a majority Turkish rule must cease, and that the Turkish Capital and the Straits must be taken from Turkish control to secure a free road to her far-flung dominions in Asia, India in particular*1.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Combined with the British desire to end the continuance of Turkish power as an effective administration in any part of Europe, David Lloyd George, the Prime Minister of the British coalition govemment, followed a policy for the expulsion of the Turks from Constantinople, even though there was a great degree of opposition within his own cabinet.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Brıtısh · Polıcy · Turks

Özet

Great Britain's policy aims after World War I towards the defeated Ottoman Empire markedly included that wherever Armenians, Kurds, Greeks and Arabs constituted a majority Turkish rule must cease, and that the Turkish Capital and the Straits must be taken from Turkish control to secure a free road to her far-flung dominions in Asia, India in particular*1. Combined with the British desire to end the continuance of Turkish power as an effective administration in any part of Europe, David Lloyd George, the Prime Minister of the British coalition govemment, followed a policy for the expulsion of the Turks from Constantinople, even though there was a great degree of opposition within his own cabinet.

Anahtar kelimeler
🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZDEN, N. (1998). British Policy On The Fate Of Constantinople And The Allıed Occupatıon Of The Cıty On March 16,1920. Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 42, 836–869. https://ajindex.com/articles/467973

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Lloyd George's statement in Parliamentary Debates - PD(Commons), 26 February 1920, vol. 125, pp. 1966-7. For themes, see Lord Cecil's statement in PD (Commons), 26 February 1920, voi. 125, pp. 1973-5. Sir Donald Maclean's statement in PD (Commons), 26 February 1920, vol. 125, pp. 1951-4. Viscount Bryce's statement in PD (Lords), 11 March 1920, vol. 39, pp. 397, 400-3; Henry Asquith's statement in PD (Commons), 25 March 1920, vol. 127, pp. 640-2.
  2. Curzon, H. Nicolson, The Last Phase 1919-1925, London 1937. CAB23/37, Confeıence 18, Conelusions of a Conference, London 5 January 1920.
  3. Cumming, H.H., Franco-British Rivalry in the l’ost-War Near East: The decline of French influence, London 1981.
  4. Hurewitz, J. C., Diplomacy in the Near and Middlle East: A Documentary Record 1914- 1956, vol. II, New York 1956.
  5. Busch, B.C., Mudros to Lausanne: Britain's Frontier in West Asia, 1918-1923, New York 1976.
  6. Helmreich, P.C., From Paris to Sevres: The Partition ofthe Ottoman Empire at the Peace Conference of 1919-1920, Ohio 1974.
  7. Zürcher, E.J., The Unionist Factor: The Role of the Comnıittee of Union and Progress in the Turkish National Movement 1905-1926, Leiden 1984.
  8. George, Lloyd, Memoirs of the Peace Conference, vol. II, New Haven 1939. PD (Commons), 26 February 1920, vol. 125, pp. 1960-2.
  9. Petsalis, N.- Diomidis, Greece at the Paris Peace Conference (1919), Thessaloniki 1978.
  10. Hankey, L., The Supreme Control at the Paris Peace Conference 1919, London 1963. Br. Doc. IV: 806, Robeck to Curzon, No. 1836, Constantinople 10 October 1919. Foreign Secretary in Balfour's place since October 1919. Lord President in Curzon's place since October 1919.
  11. C. J. Lowe-M.D. DockrilI, The Mirage ofPower, vol. II, London 1972.
  12. Helmreich, From Paris to Sevres, pp. 191-4.
  13. E.L. Knudsen, Great Britain, Constantinople, and the Turkish Peace Treaty 1919-1922, London 1987. Br. Doc. IV; 959, Minutes of Second Meeting of the Anglo-French Conference, 22 December 1919. CAB23/37, Conference 18, Conclusions of a Conference, London 5.January 1920.;
  14. Knudsen, Great Britain, pp. 143-7.
  15. M.L. Dockrill and J.D. Goold, Peace Without Promise: Britain and the Peace Conferences, 1919-23, London 1981.
  16. S.D. Waley, Edwin Montagu: A menıoir and an account of his visits to India, London 1964.
  17. R.R. James, Churchill; Study in Failore 1900-1939, London 1970. M.L. Smith, lonian Vision: Greece in Asia Minör 1919-1922, London 1973. PD (Commons), 26 February 1920, vol. 125, pp. 1964-5. Viscount Bryce’s statement in PD (Lords