KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4

An Evaluation on the Sexual Mutilation in Females of Gylippus Simon, 1879 species (Gylippinae, Gylippidae, Solifugae)

Gylippus Simon, 1879 Türlerinin Dişi Bireylerinde Eşeysel Deformasyon Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme (Gylippinae, Gylippidae, Solifugae)

Melek ERDEK
Sayfa
1581–1586
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The deformations and cuticular injuries on the genital segment, caused difficulties in species identification, are derived from the coercive copulation behaviour during the mating and premating processKey words: Solifuge, Gylippus, Solifugae, deformation, coercive copulation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The genital sternite is differentiated from other opisthosomal sternites in female gylippids and used for identification as a distinctive characteristic.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Gylippus (Gylippus) erseni Koç&Erdek, 2019, Gylippus (Gylippus) syriacus Simon, 1872, Gylippus (Hemigylippus) bayrami Erdek, 2015, Gylippus (Paragylippus) monoceros Werner, 1905 and Gylippus sp. belong, including five different species It has been noted that, the male exhibits aggressive and compulsive behaviours after approaching the female during the mating period.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The deformations and cuticular injuries on the genital segment, caused difficulties in species identification, are derived from the coercive copulation behaviour during the mating and premating processKey words: Solifuge, Gylippus, Solifugae, deformation, coercive copulation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The genital sternite is differentiated from other opisthosomal sternites in female gylippids and used for identification as a distinctive characteristic. In the present study, twenty-four female specimens belong to Gylippus Simon genus were examined. The female specimens collected from different localities of Turkey. Gylippus (Gylippus) erseni Koç&Erdek, 2019, Gylippus (Gylippus) syriacus Simon, 1872, Gylippus (Hemigylippus) bayrami Erdek, 2015, Gylippus (Paragylippus) monoceros Werner, 1905 and Gylippus sp. belong, including five different species It has been noted that, the male exhibits aggressive and compulsive behaviours after approaching the female during the mating period. The deformations and cuticular injuries on the genital segment, caused difficulties in species identification, are derived from the coercive copulation behaviour during the mating and premating processKey words: Solifuge, Gylippus, Solifugae, deformation, coercive copulation.

Abstract

Genital sternit dişi gylippidlerde diğer abdominal sternitlerden farklılaşmış olup ayırt edici karakter olarak teşhiste kullanılır. Bu çalışma kapsamında, Gylippus Simon cinsine ait 24 dişi bireyin genital segmentleri incelenmiştir. Türkiye’nin farklı bölgelerinden toplanan dişi örnekler, Gylippus (Gylippus) erseni Koç&Erdek, 2019, Gylippus (Gylippus) syriacus Simon, 1872, Gylippus (Hemigylippus) bayrami Erdek, 2015, Gylippus (Paragylippus) monoceros Werner, 1905 ve Gylippus sp. olmak üzere 5 farklı türe aittir. Çiftleşme döneminde erkeğin dişiye yaklaşması sonrasında saldırgan ve zorlayıcı davranışlar sergilediği kaydedilmiştir. Zaman zaman tür teşhisinde zorlanmalara neden olan genital segmentteki bu deformasyonlar ve kütikular yaralar çiftleşme sırasında ve çiftleşme öncesindeki zorlayıcı davranışından ileri gelmektedir.Anahtar kelimeler: Böğü, Gylippus, Solifugae, deformasyon, zorlayıcı çiftleşme.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERDEK, M. (2022). An Evaluation on the Sexual Mutilation in Females of Gylippus Simon, 1879 species (Gylippinae, Gylippidae, Solifugae). Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 4, 1581–1586. https://ajindex.com/articles/466746

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Birula, A.A. 1913. Monographie der Solifugen-Gattung Gylippus Simon. Annuaire du Musee Zoologique de l’Academie des Sciences de St.-Petersbourg, 18: 317-400, tabs. 7-11
  2. Botero-Trujillo R., Ott R., Mattoni C.I., Nime M.F., Ojanguren-Affilastro A.A. 2019. Two new species of the sun-spider genus Gaucha from Argentina and Brazil (Solifugae, Mummuciidae). Zootaxa, 4551 (2): 180-194
  3. Carvalho L S., Botero-Trujillo R. 2019. On the sun-spiders of the ibirapemussu species-group of the genus Gaucha Mello-Leitão, 1924 (Solifugae, Mummuciidae), with description of a new species. Zootaxa, 4700 (2): 289-298
  4. Cushing P.E., Brookhart J.O. 2016. Nine new species of the Eremobates scaber species group of the North American camel spider genus Eremobates (Solifugae, Eremobatidae). Zootaxa, 4178 (4): 503-520
  5. Erdek M. 2019. Description of the new solifuge Gylippus (Paragylippus) hakkaricus sp. n. (Gylippidae, Solifugae). Zootaxa, 4695 (6): 559-567
  6. Hrušková‐Martišová M., Pekár S., Bilde T. 2010. Coercive copulation in two sexually cannibalistic camel‐spider species (Arachnida: Solifugae). Journal of Zoology, 282 (2): 91-99
  7. Klann A.E. 2009. Histology and ultrastructure of solifuges. Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald. 1-228
  8. Koç H., Erdek M. 2019. Gylippus (Gylippus) erseni sp. n. (Solifugae: Gylippidae: Gylippinae), a new solifuge species from Turkey. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica, 71 (2): 159-166
  9. Maddahi H., Aliabadian M., Moradmand M., Mirshamsi O. 2019. New insights to the taxonomy of Rhagodes eylandti (Walter, 1889): A remarkable sexually dimorphic species (Solifugae: Rhagodidae). Zootaxa, 4648 (3): 494-510
  10. Muma M.H. 1966. Mating behavior in the solpugid genus Eremobates Banks. Animal Behavior, 14: 346-350
  11. Nessler S.H., Uhl G., Schneider J.M. 2007. Genital damage in the orb-web spider Argiope bruennichi (Araneae: Araneidae) increases paternity success. Behavioral Ecology, 18 (1): 174- 181
  12. Peretti A.V., Willemart R.H. 2007. Sexual coercion does not exclude luring behavior in the climbing camel-spider Oltacola chacoensis (Arachnida, Solifugae, Ammotrechidae). Journal of Ethology, 25 (1): 29-39
  13. Punzo F. 1998. The Biology of camel-spiders (Arachnida, Solifugae). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA. 1-297
  14. Roewer C.F. 1933. Solifugae, Palpigradi. In: Bronn, E.G., (Ed.), Klassen und Ordnungen des Tierreichs
  15. Arthropoda. IV. Arachnoidea und kleinere ihnen nahegestellte Arthropodengruppen. Vol. 5 (IV) (4)