Dergiler / Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

AN INVESTIGATION ON SOUND GENERATION IN DIFFERENT FABRICS

Sayfa
52–59
Yayın Tarihi
2018-03-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supply lower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Fabric sound is comprised as fabric handle property such as fabric softness, stiffness and drape.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Higher bending rigidity and higher kinetic friction coefficient (µ) values increase frictional sound.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supply lower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Waving sound · frictional sound · fabrics rustle sound

Özet

Fabric sound is comprised as fabric handle property such as fabric softness, stiffness and drape. As the previous studies were reviewed, it could be seen that, in general different sound generation systems were used in which the fabric was pulled in a constant velocity. In these measurement systems, a fabric sample was rubbed against the face of another fabric sample and the friction occurred face to face. However, in some actions, friction is not always face to face. There are several different movements (such as jogging) and friction types in which the physical properties such as friction, roughness, shear, and bending stiffness act important role on fabric sound. In order to imitate all these situations, “waving movement sound” was designed. In addition to this, “frictional movement sound” was also defined and used to compare waving movement sound with the common (caused by face to face friction) frictional sound. The aim of this study is to investigate the sound generation properties of the fabrics under the influence of different frictions and movements. For this purpose, three different commonly used woven fabrics and three military windcheater fabrics were used and “Level Pressure of Total Sound (LPT)” values of these were measured during “frictional movement” and “waving movement”. According to the results, since frictional movement created higher friction force, LPT values of the frictional movement was found higher than the LPT values of waving movement. Higher bending rigidity and higher kinetic friction coefficient (µ) values increase frictional sound. In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supply lower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.

Abstract

Fabric sound is comprised as fabric handle property such as fabric softness, stiffness and drape. As the previous studies were reviewed, it could be seen that, in general different sound generation systems were used in which the fabric was pulled in a constant velocity. In these measurement systems, a fabric sample was rubbed against the face of another fabric sample and the friction occurred face to face. However, in some actions, friction is not always face to face. There are several different movements (such as jogging) and friction types in which the physical properties such as friction, roughness, shear, and bending stiffness act important role on fabric sound. In order to imitate all these situations, “waving movement sound” was designed. In addition to this, “frictional movement sound” was also defined and used to compare waving movement sound with the common (caused by face to face friction) frictional sound. The aim of this study is to investigate the sound generation properties of the fabrics under the influence of different frictions and movements. For this purpose, three different commonly used woven fabrics and three military windcheater fabrics were used and “Level Pressure of Total Sound (LPT)” values of these were measured during “frictional movement” and “waving movement”. According to the results, since frictional movement created higher friction force, LPT values of the frictional movement was found higher than the LPT values of waving movement. Higher bending rigidity and higher kinetic friction coefficient (µ) values increase frictional sound. In conclusion, smoother, thinner and softer surfaces supply lower LPT values in both “frictional movement” and “waving movement” sounds.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MENGÜÇ, G. S., DEMİR, A., BOZDOĞAN, F., SEVENTEKİN, N. (2018). AN INVESTIGATION ON SOUND GENERATION IN DIFFERENT FABRICS. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 52–59. https://ajindex.com/articles/46034

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Kim, C.; Yang, Y.; Cho, G. Characteristics of Sounds Generated from Vapor Permeable Water Repellent Fabrics by Low-speed Frictions, Fibers and Polymers, 2008, Vol.9, No.5, 639-645 2. Kim, C.; Cho, G.; Hong, K.A. Shim, H.J. Sound Characteristics According to Cross-Sectional Shapes of Fibers, Fibers and Polymers, 2003, Vol.4, No.4, pp. 199-203 3. Na, Y.; Cho, G.; Variations in Sensibility to Fabric Frictional Sound by Fiber Type and Subject, Textile Research Journal; 2003, 73; 837 4. Jin, E.; Cho, G. Effect of Frictional Sound of Combat Uniform Fabrics on Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) Responses, Fibers and Polymers, 2013, Vol.14, No.3, 500-505 5. Yi, E.;Cho, G. Fabric-sound Classification by Autoregressive Parameters, Journal of the Textile Institute, 2000, 91: 4, 530 -545 6. Cho, J.; Cho,G., Determining the Psychoacoustic Parameters That Affect Subjective Sensation of Fabric Sounds at Given Sound Pressures, Textile Research Journal, 2007, 77; polypropylene. 29-37 7. McCullough, E.A. A Comparison of the Comfort and Hand Characteristics of Lining Fabrics, GAMA (Global Acetate Manufacturers Association) Technical Report # 99-08, 1999 8. Kim, C.; Cho, G.; Yoon, H.; Park, S. Characteristics of Rustling Sounds Created by the Structure of Polyester Warp Knitted Fabrics, Textile Research Journal, 2003, 73; pp.685 -691 9. Cho S and Cho G. Minimizing Frictional Sound of PU-Nanoweb and PTFE Film Laminated Vapor Permeable Water Repellent Fabrics. Fibers and Polymers 2012; Vol.13, No:1:123-129, DOI 10.1007/s12221-012-0123-y 10. Yang, Y., Kim, C., Park, J., You, H., Cho, G., Application of the Real Fabric Frictional Speeds to the Fabric Sound Analysis using Water Repellent Fabrics, Fibers and Polymers 2009, Vol.10, No.4, 557-561, DOI 10.1007/s12221-009-0557-z 11. Park C., Cho G., Analysis of Acoustic Characteristics of Fabrics in Terms of Mechanical Properties, Fibers and Polymers 2012; Vol.13, No: 3: 403-410. 11 12. Wang P-N, Ho M-H, Cheng K-B, Murray R, Lin Ch-H. Study on the Friction Sound Properties of Natural-Fiber Woven Fabrics, Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe 2017; 25, 2(122): 34-42. DOI: 10.5604/12303666.1228183 13. http://www.deltaohm.com/ver2008/uk/depliant/hd2010UC_D_uk.pdf 14. Bishop, DP. Fabrics: Sensory and Mechanical Properties. Text. Prog. 1996, 26, 12-13, 41. 15. Giordano, B.L.; Avanzini, F. Chapter 4 Perception and Synthesis of Sound-Generating Materials, Springer-Verlag London 2014, M. Di Luca (ed.), Multisensory Softness, Springer Series on To