Dergiler / Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 64

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEMINIST APPROACH TO ALL-FEMALE WORLDS IN CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN’S HERLAND AND JOANNA RUSS’S “WHEN IT CHANGED”

Sayfa
91–105
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The result of the comparative analysis of two works shows that despite the different periods in which these works were situated, they put forward similar concerns regarding women’s oppressed position in private and public lives while expressing it from different literary devices.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to explore Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s novel Herland (1915) and Joanna Russ’s short story “When It Changed” (1972) with the comparative method in order to determine the similarities and differences between the feminist approaches of two authors and thus seeks to find and reveal the reasons underneath these similarities and differences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Accordingly, quotations taken from two works are analyzed in parallel with each other.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The result of the comparative analysis of two works shows that despite the different periods in which these works were situated, they put forward similar concerns regarding women’s oppressed position in private and public lives while expressing it from different literary devices.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Feminism · Herland · When It Changed

Özet

This study aims to explore Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s novel Herland (1915) and Joanna Russ’s short story “When It Changed” (1972) with the comparative method in order to determine the similarities and differences between the feminist approaches of two authors and thus seeks to find and reveal the reasons underneath these similarities and differences. Accordingly, quotations taken from two works are analyzed in parallel with each other. The result of the comparative analysis of two works shows that despite the different periods in which these works were situated, they put forward similar concerns regarding women’s oppressed position in private and public lives while expressing it from different literary devices.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZYÖN, A. (2022). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FEMINIST APPROACH TO ALL-FEMALE WORLDS IN CHARLOTTE PERKINS GILMAN’S HERLAND AND JOANNA RUSS’S “WHEN IT CHANGED”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 64, 91–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/452890

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Booker, M. Keith “Woman on the Edge of a Genre: The Feminist Dystopias of Marge Piercy”. SCIENCE-FICTION STUDIES, VOLUME 21 (1994), pp. 337350. Donovan, Josephine. Feminist Teoriler (Turkish trans. Aksu Bora, Meltem Ağduk Gevrek, Fevziye Sayılan) (English trans. Arzu Özyön) İletişim Publication, İstanbul. 2005.
  2. Firestone, Shulamith. Cinselliğin Diyalektiği, Yurdanur Salman (Turkish trans.). (English trans. Arzu Özyön) İstanbul: Payel Publishing House, 2013. (Originally published in 1970.)
  3. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins Stetson. Herland, New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
  4. Magarey, Susan. “Dreams and desires: four 1970s feminist visions of utopia.” in Dangerous Ideas: Women’s Liberation-Women’s Studies- Around the World. South Australia: University of Adelaide Press, 2014.
  5. Moi, Toril. Sexual/Textual Politics. USA/Canada: Routledge, 2002.
  6. Register, Cheri. “American Feminist Literary Criticism: A Bibliographical Introduction’ Feminist Literary Criticism in Feminist Literary Theory (ed.) Mary Eagleton, Malden, USA, 1996.
  7. Russ, Joanna. When It Changed in Utopias and Dystopias. https://americanfuturesiup.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/russ-when-it-changed.pdf (15 April 2019).
  8. Showalter, Elaine. A Literature of Their Own. British Women Novelists From Bronte to Lessing. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1977.