KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

IS THERE A RELATION BETWEEN ALVEOLAR RIDGE DIMENSIONS AND BUCCAL UNDERCUT IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA?≠

Fatma Nur YILDIZ
Zühre Zafersoy AKARSLAN
Sayfa
174–180
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Comparedto males, the presence of buccal undercut was found to be significantly higher in females in the regions of between right lateral-canine teeth, left central-lateral teeth and left lateral-canine teeth (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate of the relation between the alveolar ridge dimensions and buccal undercut in the anterior maxilla.Material and Methods:Cone-beam computed tomography images of 150 patients (97 females, 53 males), aged between 16-40 years having full anterior dentition at the maxilla were evaluated.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results:It was found that the prevalence of buccal undercuts in different regions ranged from 74% to 84% on average.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Comparedto males, the presence of buccal undercut was found to be significantly higher in females in the regions of between right lateral-canine teeth, left central-lateral teeth and left lateral-canine teeth (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate of the relation between the alveolar ridge dimensions and buccal undercut in the anterior maxilla.Material and Methods:Cone-beam computed tomography images of 150 patients (97 females, 53 males), aged between 16-40 years having full anterior dentition at the maxilla were evaluated. Six-hundred cross-sectional images were obtained from the regions between central, lateral and canine teeth in the right and left maxilla. The alveolar height and width, and the presence and depth of buccal undercut in these regions were assessed. Results:It was found that the prevalence of buccal undercuts in different regions ranged from 74% to 84% on average. Comparedto males, the presence of buccal undercut was found to be significantly higher in females in the regions of between right lateral-canine teeth, left central-lateral teeth and left lateral-canine teeth (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, F. N., AKARSLAN, Z. Z. (2022). IS THERE A RELATION BETWEEN ALVEOLAR RIDGE DIMENSIONS AND BUCCAL UNDERCUT IN THE ANTERIOR MAXILLA?≠. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 174–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/451636

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Consolaro A, Romano FL. Reasons for mini-implants failure: choosing installation site should be valued!. Dental Press J Orthod. 2014
  2. Zhang W, Skrypczak A, Weltman R. Anterior maxilla alveolar ridge dimension and morphology measurement by cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) for immediate implant treatment planning. BMC Oral Health 2015
  3. Shapurian T, Damoulis PD, Reiser GM, Griffin TJ, Rand WM. Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006
  4. Almasoud NN, Tanneru N, Marei HF. Alveolar bone density and its clinical implication in the placement of dental implants and orthodontic mini-implants. SaudiMedJ 2016
  5. Cassetta M, Sofan AAA, Altieri F, Barbato E. Evaluation of alveolar corticalbone thickness and density for orthodontic mini-implant placement. J Clin Exp Dent 2016
  6. e245-52. 6.Hiasa K, Abe Y, Okazaki Y, Nogami K, Mizumachi W, Akagawa Y. Preoperative computed tomography-derived bone densities in Hounsfield Units at implant sites acquired primary stability. ISRN Dent 2011, Article ID 678729. 7.Hao Y, Zhao W, Wang Y, Yu J, Zou D. Assessments of jaw bone density at implant sites using 3D cone-beam computed tomography. Eur RevMed Pharmacol Sci 2014
  7. Fuh L-J, Huang H-L, Chen C-S, Fu K-L, Shen Y-W, Tu M-G, Shen W-C, Hsu J-T. Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regionsof the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil2010
  8. 51 9.Kim H-J, Yu S-K, Lee M-H, Lee H-J, Kim H-J, Chung C-H. Cortical and cancellous bone thickness on the anterior region of alveolar bone in Korean: a study of dentate human cadavers. JAdv Prosthodont 2012
  9. Ozdemir F, Tozlu M, Germec Cakan D. Quantitative evaluation of alveolar cortical bone density in adults with different vertical facial types using cone-beam computed tomography. Korean J Orthod2014
  10. Çakur B, Sümbüllü MA, Harorlı A. Operasyon öncesi implant yerlerinin belirlenmesinde radyolojik kriterler ve radyolojik teknik seçimi. J DentFac Atatürk Uni 2007
  11. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, Gröndahl K, Harris D, Jacobs R, Lekholm U, Nakielny R, van Steenberghe D, van der Stelt P. EAO Guidelines for the use of Diagnostic Imaging in Implant Dentistry: A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity CollegeDublin. Clin Oral Implants Res2002
  12. White SC, Pharoah M.J. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 7 st ed