Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2019 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Diagnostic utility of two-dimensional shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions

Sayfa
156–160
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The standard deviation (ESD) of speed modehad the best diagnostic performance when compared otherquantitative parameters

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography in thedifferentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.Material and Methods: A total of 83 breast lesions in 76 patients were prospectively investigated with B-mode ultrasonography andtwo-dimensional shear wave elastography techniques.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:B-mode ultrasonography findings were classified based on BI-RADS lexicon5th edition.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The standard deviation (ESD) of speed modehad the best diagnostic performance when compared otherquantitative parameters
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of two-dimensional shear wave elastography in thedifferentiation of malignant and benign breast lesions.Material and Methods: A total of 83 breast lesions in 76 patients were prospectively investigated with B-mode ultrasonography andtwo-dimensional shear wave elastography techniques. B-mode ultrasonography findings were classified based on BI-RADS lexicon5th edition. The mean elasticity and the standard deviation of speed mode (m/s) and elasticity mode (kPa) were calculated for allbreast lesions. Diagnostic performances of each quantitative parameters were compared.Results: Of 83 breast lesions, 45 (54.2%) were benign and 38 (45.7%) were malignant. Among the all shear wave elastographyparameters, the standard deviation (ESD) of the shear wave speed (m/s) had the highest AUROC (0.953) value. When a cut-off valueof 0.85 m/s was used for ESD of speed mode, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV were detected as 94.7%, 88.8%, 91.5%,87.8%, and 95.2%, respectively.Conclusions: Two-dimensional shear wave elastography has excellent diagnostic performance in the differentiation of benign andmalignant breast lesions. The standard deviation (ESD) of speed modehad the best diagnostic performance when compared otherquantitative parameters

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARSLAN, S., DURMAZ, M. S., ÜNLÜ, Y., ERYILMAZ, M. A., ALTUNKESER, A., ONCU, F. (2022). Diagnostic utility of two-dimensional shear wave elastography to differentiate benign and malignant breast lesions. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 156–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/446924

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Huang Z, Wen W, Zheng Y, et al. Breast cancer incidence and mortality: trends over 40 years among women in shanghai, China. Ann Oncol 2016;27:1129-34
  2. Khalis M, El Rhazi K, Charaka H, et al. Female breast cancer incidence and mortality in morocco: comparison with other countries. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2016;17:5211-6
  3. Hall TJ. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: topics in US: beyond the basics: elasticity imaging with US. Radiographics 2003;23:1657-71
  4. Joe BN, Sickles EA. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present. Radiology 2014;273:S23-44
  5. Li DD, Xu HX, Guo LH, et al. Combination of two-dimensional shear wave elastography with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system in the diagnosis of breast lesions: a new method to increase the diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 2016;26:3290-300
  6. Arslan S, Uslu N, Ozturk FU, et al. Can strain elastography combined with ultrasound breast imaging reporting and data system be a more effective method in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions? J Med Ultrason (2001) 2017;44:289-96
  7. Au FW, Ghai S, Moshonov H, et al. Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear wave elastography in the evaluation of solid breast masses: determination of the most discriminatory parameter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:W328-36
  8. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006;239:341-50
  9. Yoon JH, Kim MH, Kim EK, et al. Interobserver variability of ultrasound elastography: how it affects the diagnosis of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:730-6
  10. Ren WW, Li XL, He YP, et al. Two-dimensional shear wave elastography of breast lesions: Comparison of two different systems. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2017;66:37-46
  11. Bakdik S, Arslan S, Oncu F, et al. Effectiveness of Superb Microvascular Imaging for the differentiation of intraductal breast lesions. Med Ultrason 2018;20:306-12
  12. Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, et al. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res 2010;12:R104
  13. Liu B, Zheng Y, Huang G, et al. Breast lesions: quantitative diagnosis using ultrasound shear wave elastography-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2016;42:835-47
  14. Yang YP, Xu XH, Guo LH, et al. Qualitative and quantitative analysis with a novel shear wave speed imaging for differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Sci Rep 2017;7:40