Dergiler / Annals of Medical Research / 2021 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

The comparison of two different direct acting antiviralregimens in treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus

Sayfa
1009–1014
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

SVR12 rates of 100% were obtained in both treatment regimens for all treatment naïve and treatment-experienced patients regardless of cirrhosis occurrence and of HCV genotype.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered a critical threat to the public health in the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We compared treatment outcomesof Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir and Ritonavir with Dasabuvir (PrOD) and Ledipasvir (LDV) and Sofosbuvir (SOF) in real world patients with chronic HCV in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients with chronic HCV.MaterialS and Methods: 91 adult patients enrolled in our study and were divided in two groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:SVR12 rates of 100% were obtained in both treatment regimens for all treatment naïve and treatment-experienced patients regardless of cirrhosis occurrence and of HCV genotype.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is considered a critical threat to the public health in the world. We compared treatment outcomesof Ombitasvir, Paritaprevir and Ritonavir with Dasabuvir (PrOD) and Ledipasvir (LDV) and Sofosbuvir (SOF) in real world patients with chronic HCV in treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients with chronic HCV.MaterialS and Methods: 91 adult patients enrolled in our study and were divided in two groups. The first group; consisted of 53patients, who orally received a fixed-dose combination tablet comprised of LDV and SOF once daily for 24 weeks. The second group; consisted of 38 patients, who orally received a fixed-dose combination tablet comprised of PrOD twice daily for 12 weeks without regard to fat or calorie content. Results: The results showed that sustained virologic response (SVR) rates were 100% in the both groups analyzed. 76 adverse eventswere occurred in total. 46 of overall adverse events were found on patients in the first group and 30 of those events were found on patients in the second group. Weakness (13.1%), pruritus (5.5%), myalgia (1.1%) nausea (5.5%), dry mouth (1.1%) and insomnia (1.1%) were observed among the patients. Twelve weeks after initiating treatment, virologic suppression was accomplished for all patients in the both groups. Additionally, laboratory analysis concluded that HCV-RNA levels of the overall patients were negative after 48 weeks of the onset of the treatment.Conclusion: The real world comparative analysis of two distinct treatment regimens concluded that administration of PrOD and LDV/ SOF on the patients with chronic HCV has an extremely effective outcome. SVR12 rates of 100% were obtained in both treatment regimens for all treatment naïve and treatment-experienced patients regardless of cirrhosis occurrence and of HCV genotype.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ince, N., Pekgoz, M. (2022). The comparison of two different direct acting antiviralregimens in treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus. Annals of Medical Research, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 1009–1014. https://ajindex.com/articles/445680

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. World Health Organization: Global Hepatitis Report. https://www.who.int/hepatitis/publications/global- hepatitis-report2017/en/ access date April 207 2. De Ávila Machado MA, De Moura CS, Klein M, et al. Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C: Predictors of Early Discontinuation in the Real World. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 2019
  2. Geddawy A, Ibrahim YF, Elbahie NM, et al. Direct Acting Anti-hepatitis C Virus Drugs: Clinical Pharmacology and Future Direction. J Transl Int Med 2017
  3. Indolfi G, Serranti D, Resti M. Direct-acting antivirals for children and adolescents with chronic hepatitis C. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2018
  4. Asselah T, Marcellin P. Direct acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: one pill a day for tomorrow. Liver Int 2012
  5. Loo N, Lawitz E, Alkhouri N, et al. Ombitasvir/ paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir +/- ribavirin in real world hepatitis C patients. World J Gastroenterol 2019
  6. Matthew AN, Zephyr J, Hill CJ, et al. Hepatitis C Virus NS3/4A Protease Inhibitors Incorporating Flexible P2 Quinoxalines Target Drug Resistant Viral Variants. J Med Chem 2017
  7. Gitto S, Gamal N, Andreone P. NS5A inhibitors for the treatment of hepatitis C infection. J Viral Hepat 2017
  8. Stedman C. Sofosbuvir, a NS5B polymerase inhibitor in the treatment of hepatitis C: a review of its clinical potential. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2014
  9. Gentile I, A.R. Buonomo, G. Borgia. Dasabuvir: A Non- Nucleoside Inhibitor of NS5B for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2014
  10. World Health Organization: Guidelines for the care and treatment of persons diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. https://www.who.int/hepatitis/ publications/hepatitis-c-guidelines-2018/en/ access date July 2018. 12. Afdhal N, Reddy KR, Nelson DR, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for previously treated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014
  11. Afdhal N, Zeuzem S, Kwo P, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for untreated HCV genotype 1 infection. N Engl J Med 2014
  12. Kowdley KV, Gordon SC, Reddy KR, et al. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 8 or 12 weeks for chronic HCV without cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2014
  13. Ferenci P, Bernstein D, Lalezari J, et al. ABT-450/r– Ombitasvir and Dasabuvir with or without Ribavirin for HCV. N Engl J Med 2014
  14. Manuel Sousa J, Vergara M, Pulido F,