KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Law Review / 2010 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

AN ANALYSIS OF WAGNER & BROWN, LTD., v. SHEPPARD

Lalenur IRDEM
Sayfa
127–146
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sheppard,the main discussion focuses on a pooling clause, specifically the legal nature ofthat clause and the rights conveyed from lessor to lessee through such pooling.After providing a detailed analysis of Wagner and Brown with regard to thejurisdiction in which it was decided, this article applies that lens to theexamination and comparison of the Turkish legislatureFs treatment of pooling.This leads to the Texas Supreme CourtFs decision being called into questionbased on its arbitrary interpretation of fundamental property law principals.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Oil and gas leases are one of the main granting instruments used in the oilindustry.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 5contract and conveyance8 nature of these leases can makecertain clauses challenging to interpret.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sheppard,the main discussion focuses on a pooling clause, specifically the legal nature ofthat clause and the rights conveyed from lessor to lessee through such pooling.After providing a detailed analysis of Wagner and Brown with regard to thejurisdiction in which it was decided, this article applies that lens to theexamination and comparison of the Turkish legislatureFs treatment of pooling.This leads to the Texas Supreme CourtFs decision being called into questionbased on its arbitrary interpretation of fundamental property law principals.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Oil and gas leases are one of the main granting instruments used in the oilindustry. The 5contract and conveyance8 nature of these leases can makecertain clauses challenging to interpret. In Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. Sheppard,the main discussion focuses on a pooling clause, specifically the legal nature ofthat clause and the rights conveyed from lessor to lessee through such pooling.After providing a detailed analysis of Wagner and Brown with regard to thejurisdiction in which it was decided, this article applies that lens to theexamination and comparison of the Turkish legislatureFs treatment of pooling.This leads to the Texas Supreme CourtFs decision being called into questionbased on its arbitrary interpretation of fundamental property law principals.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

IRDEM, L. (2022). AN ANALYSIS OF WAGNER & BROWN, LTD., v. SHEPPARD. Ankara Law Review, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 127–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/441658

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Brunner, M.T. Annotation, What Constitutes Power Coupled With Interest Within Rule As To Termination Of Agency, 28 A.L.R.2d 1243 (1953).
  2. Lowe, John S., Owen L. Anderson, Ernest E. Smith, and David E. Pierce, CASES AND MATERIALS ON OIL AND GAS LAW 307 (Thompson West 2008).
  3. Pierce, David E., Interpreting Oil and Gas Instruments, 1 TEXAS JOURNAL OF OIL, GAS & ENERGY LAW 1 (2006).
  4. Shade, Joseph, PRIMER ON THE TEXAS LAW OF OIL AND GAS 31, (Michie, 4th ed., 2008.
  5. Shank, Ralph, Some Legal Problems Presented By The Pooling Provisions of Modern Oil And Gas Leases, 23 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 150 (1945).
  6. Smith, Ernest E., The Texas Compulsory Pooling Act, 43 TEXAS LAW REVIEW 1003 (1965).
  7. Walker, A.W., The Nature of the Property Interest Created by an Oil and Gas Lease in Texas, 7 TEXAS LAW REV 539 (1929).