KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

AN EXTENDED LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING APPROACH FOR CAD MODEL GENERATION

Erkan GÜNPINAR
Shahroz KHAN
Sayfa
301–314
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Three different CAD models are utilized for this study’s experiments inorder to show the results of the ELHS algorithm

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this paper, extended version of Latin hypercube sampling (ELHS) is proposed to obtain different design variations of a CADmodel.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In each trial, all the candidate designs are enumerated and one of them is selected based on a cost function.Value of the cost function is zero if all design constraints of the design are satisfied.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Three different CAD models are utilized for this study’s experiments inorder to show the results of the ELHS algorithm
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this paper, extended version of Latin hypercube sampling (ELHS) is proposed to obtain different design variations of a CADmodel. The model is first represented by design parameters. Design constraints that are relationships between the parametersare then determined. After assigning value ranges for the design parameters, design space is formed. Each design parameterrepresents a dimension of this design space. Design is a point in the design space and is feasible if it satisfies the predefineddesign constraints. Otherwise, it is infeasible. ELHS utilizes an input design in order to obtain feasible designs.All dimensions of the design space are divided into equal number of intervals. ELHS perform trials in design space to findfeasible designs. In each trial, all the candidate designs are enumerated and one of them is selected based on a cost function.Value of the cost function is zero if all design constraints of the design are satisfied. A similarity constraint is introduced inorder to eliminate designs with similar geometries. Three different CAD models are utilized for this study’s experiments inorder to show the results of the ELHS algorithm

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNPINAR, E., KHAN, S. (2022). AN EXTENDED LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING APPROACH FOR CAD MODEL GENERATION. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 301–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/438284

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. MaKa M, Beckman R and Conover W. A comparision of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from computer code. Technimeterics 1979; 42: 55-61
  2. Iman R, Conover W. Small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computers models, with an application to risk assessment. Communications in statistics-theory and methods 1980; 9: 1749-1842
  3. Johson R, Wichern D. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. New Jersey. Prentice-Hall, 2002. pp. 767
  4. Morris M, Mitchell T. Exploratory designs for computational experiments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1995; 43: 381-402
  5. Deutsch J, Deutsch C. Latin hypercube sampling with multidimensional uniformity. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2012; 142: 763-772
  6. Cioppa T, Lucas T. Efficient nearly orthogonal and space-filling latin hypercubes. Technometrics 2007; 49: 45-55
  7. Qian P. Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2012; 107: 393-399
  8. Cao RY, Liu MQ. Construction of second-order orthogonal sliced Latin hypercube designs. Journal of Complexity 2014; 30: 762-772
  9. Prescott P. Orthogonal-column Latin hypercube designs with small samples. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2009; 53: 1191-1200
  10. Sacks J, Schiller S, Welch W. Designs for computer experiments. Technometrics 1989; 31: 41-47
  11. Bates S, Sienz J, Langley D. Formulation of the Audze–Eglais uniform Latin hypercube design of experiments. Advances in Engineering Software 2003; 34: 493-506
  12. Bates S, Sienz J, Toropov V. Formulation of the optimal latin hypercube design. In: 45th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics & Materials Conference; 19-22 April 2004; Palm Springs, California
  13. Audze P, Eglais V. New approach for planning out of experiments. Problems Dynam Strengths 1977; 35: 104-107
  14. Rajabi M, Ashtiani B and Janssen H. Efficiency enhancement of optimized Latin hypercube sampling strategies: Application to Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis and meta-modeling. Advances in Water Resources 2015; 76: 127-139
  15. Leary S, Bhaskar A, Keane A. Optimal orthogonal-array-based latin hypercubes. Journal of Applied Statistics 2003; 30: 585-598
  16. Joseph V, Hung Y. Orthogonal-maximin latin hypercube designs. Statistica Sinica 2008; 18: 171- 186
  17. D. Bingham, R. Sitter, B. Tang. Orthogonal and nearly orthogonal designs for computer experiments. Biometrika 2009; 96: 51-65
  18. Myšáková E