Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik / 2017 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2

SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF CYLINDRICAL STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS FOR AN OIL INDUSTRY PLANT

Sayfa
275–288
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In addition to this, tanks with higher diameter have witnessed higher wave height and are possible to be in danger for tank’s roof vulnerability, while these tanks have shown an appropriate behavior against sliding

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Liquid storage tanks have a pivotal role in supplying of different type of liquids.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In addition, they are widely used in disparate industrial plants.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In addition to this, tanks with higher diameter have witnessed higher wave height and are possible to be in danger for tank’s roof vulnerability, while these tanks have shown an appropriate behavior against sliding
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Liquid storage tanks have a pivotal role in supplying of different type of liquids. In addition, they are widely used in disparate industrial plants. Failure of these structures has dire consequences and detrimental impacts on economy of countries. Hence, in this study, the seismic behavior of these structures with an emphasis on their seismic vulnerability under different conditions is analyzed. For this purpose, an oil industry plant in the south of Iran is considered and five different tanks with different dimension are chosen. Three significant vulnerability parameters which are usually taken into account for evaluation of tanks are investigated. These criterions include: 1) Sliding, 2) Elasto-Plastic buckling (Elephant foot buckling), 3) Tank roof damage. Four integral analyses including static, modal, response spectrum and time history is utilized. In time history analyses, multiple records are selected to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of system. Finally, the results show that tanks are safe under Elephant foot buckling fragility parameter. However, this is not always the case for tank’s roof vulnerability and sliding. In addition to this, tanks with higher diameter have witnessed higher wave height and are possible to be in danger for tank’s roof vulnerability, while these tanks have shown an appropriate behavior against sliding

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAZDANIAN, M., MASHAL, M., RAZAVI, S. V. (2022). SEISMIC VULNERABILITY OF CYLINDRICAL STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS FOR AN OIL INDUSTRY PLANT. Anadolu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi :A-Uygulamalı Bilimler ve Mühendislik, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 2, 275–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/438283

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Altunışık A, Türker, T. Effect of the model updating on the earthquake behavior of steel storage tanks. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2010; 66, pp. 462-469
  2. Shekari M, Khaji N, Ahmadi M. On the seismic behavior of cylindrical base-isolated liquid storage tanks excited by long-period ground motions. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010; 30, pp. 968-980
  3. Akatsuka H, and Hideo K. Fire of petroleum tank, etc. by Niigata earthquake, 2008
  4. Yazdanian M, Razavi SV, Mashal M. Study on the dynamic behavior of cylindrical steel liquid storage tanks using finite element method. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Vibration and Acoustics 2016; 2(2):144-165
  5. Housner GW. The dynamic behavior of water tanks. Journal of Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1963; 53, pp. 381–7
  6. Edwards N. A procedure for the dynamic analysis of thin walled cylindrical liquid storage tanks. Ph.D. thesis. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan, USA, (1969)
  7. James RW, Raba WG. Behavior of Welded steel water-storage tank. Journal of Structural Engineering, (1991
  8. Brown KJ, Rugar PJ, Davis CA, Rulla TA. Seismic performance of Los Angeles water tanks. Proc. Fourth U.S. Conf. On Lifeline Earthquake Engrg., M. J. O'Rourke, Editor, ASCE, New York, NY, 668- 675, 1995
  9. Haroun MA. Behaviour of unanchored oil storage tanks: imperial valley earthquake. Journal of Technical Topics in Civil Engineering; 1983; 109(1):23–40
  10. Gupta RK, Hutchinson GL. Effects of wall flexibility on the time response of liquid storage tanks. Engineering Structures, 1991; 13:253–67
  11. Kieselbach R. Bursting of a silo. Engineering Failure Analysis, 1997; 1(4), 49e55
  12. Dogangun A, Karaca Z, Durmus A, Sezen H. Cause of damage and failures in silo structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2009
  13. Brunesi E, Roberto N, Marco P, Dumitru B. Seismic performance of storage steel tanks during the May 2012 Emilia, Italy, earthquakes. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2014; 29, no. 5
  14. Hosseinzadeh N, Hamid K, Masoud G, Ehsan A, Navid Kazem. Comparison of API650-2008 provisions with FEM analyses for seismic assessment of existing steel oil storage tanks. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013; 26, no. 4
  15. Buratti N, Tavano M. Dynamic buckling and seismic fragility of anchored steel tanks by the added mass method. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics 2