KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2020 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3

Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks

İbrahim YAĞLI
Sayfa
861–873
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These results are valid even when different weights are used for CAMELS dimensions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The current study aims to compare the performance of state participation banks with the performance of private participation banks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This comparison is quite significant since both state participation banks have a very short history and Turkey is a model for the world in interest-free banking.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These results are valid even when different weights are used for CAMELS dimensions.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The current study aims to compare the performance of state participation banks with the performance of private participation banks. This comparison is quite significant since both state participation banks have a very short history and Turkey is a model for the world in interest-free banking. The integrated approach is adopted in the study. In the first stage, performance indicators are determined with the help of the CAMELS rating system. In the second stage, Turkish participation banks are ranked according to their relative performance by using the TOPSIS method. The results show that state participation banks outperform private participation banks. These results are valid even when different weights are used for CAMELS dimensions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YAĞLI, İ. (2022). Multi-Criteria Financial Performance Analysis of Turkish Participation Banks. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 3, 861–873. https://ajindex.com/articles/434810

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. AKKOC, S. & VATANSEVER, K. (2013). “Fuzzy Performance Evaluation with AHP and TOPSIS Methods: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector after the Global Financial Crisis”, Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 6(11): 53-74.
  2. ARAS, O. N. & OZTURK, M. (2011). “Analysis of Allocated Funds of Participation Banks In Terms Of Contribution to Real Economy”, Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2): 167- 169. ARIFF, M. (1989). “Islamic Banking In Malaysia: Framework, Performance, and Lessons”, International Journal of Economics, Management and Accounting, 2(2): 67-78.
  3. BATIR, T. E., VOLKMAN, D. A. & GUNGOR, B. (2017). “Determinants Of Bank Efficiency In Turkey: Participation Banks Versus Conventional Banks”, Borsa Istanbul Review, 17(2): 86-96.
  4. DAR, H. A. & PRESLEY, J. R. (2000). “Lack Of Profit Loss Sharing In Islamic Banking: Management And Control Imbalances”, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, 2(2): 3-18.
  5. DASH, M. & DAS, A. (2013). “Performance Appraisal of Indian Banks Using CAMELS Rating”, IUP Journal of Bank Management, 12(2): 31-42.
  6. DEMIRELI, E. (2010). “TOPSIS Multicriteria Decision Making Method: An Examination On State Owned Commercial Banks In Turkey”, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 5(1): 101-112.
  7. DINÇER, H. & YUKSEL, S. (2019). “An Integrated Stochastic Fuzzy MCDM Approach to the Balanced Scorecard-Based Service Evaluation”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 166: 93-112.
  8. DINCER, H., GENCER, G., ORHAN, N. & ŞAHINBAŞ, K. (2011). “A Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Banking Sector after the Global Crisis via CAMELS Ratios”, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24: 1530-1545.
  9. DINCER, H., HACIOGLU, U. & YUKSEL S. (2016). “Performance Assessment of Deposit Banks with CAMELS Analysis Using FUZZY ANP-MOORA Approaches and An Application on Turkish Banking Sector”, Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management, 6(2): 32-56.
  10. DOGAN, M. (2013). “Measuring Bank Performance with Gray Relational Analysis: The Case of Turkey”, Ege Academic Review, 13(2): 215-226.
  11. EGE, İ., TOPALOĞLU, E., & KARAKOZAK, Ö. 2015, ‘CAMELS Performans Değerleme Modeli: Türkiye’deki Mevduat Bankalari Üzerine Ampirik Bir Uygulama”, Niğde Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(4): 109-126.
  12. EROL, C., F. BAKLACI, H., AYDOGAN, B. & TUNÇ, G. (2014). “Performance Comparison of Islamic (Participation) Banks and Commercial Banks in Turkish Banking Sector”, EuroMed Journal of Business, 9(2): 114-128.
  13. GOKALP, F. (2015). “Comparin