Dergiler / Acta Veterinaria Eurasia / 2022 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1

Effectiveness of Reinforced 45S5 Bioglass with Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia and Iron in the Regeneration of Rabbit Calvarial Defects

Sayfa
35–47
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the present results, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia- and iron successfully increased the bone regenerative capacity of bioglass 45S5 which could be used as new additives in future commercial bone cement.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Large bone defects caused by various conditions or diseases still remain one of the most challenging issues to be addressed in both human and veterinary orthopedics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Conventionally, bioglass 45S5 has been applied to reconstruct large bone defects.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the present results, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia- and iron successfully increased the bone regenerative capacity of bioglass 45S5 which could be used as new additives in future commercial bone cement.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Large bone defects caused by various conditions or diseases still remain one of the most challenging issues to be addressed in both human and veterinary orthopedics. Conventionally, bioglass 45S5 has been applied to reconstruct large bone defects. We fabricated yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-bioglass 45S5 and iron-bioglass 45S5 composite powders to enhance osteoconductive and osteoinductive effects of conventional bioglass 45S5 in rabbit calvarial bone defects. First, these composite powders were analyzed via different in vitro analyses. For in vivo study, four circular calvarial defects of 10 animals were randomly filled with yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-bioglass 45S5, iron-bioglass 45S5, and bioglass 45S5 powders or left without any treatment. Diagnostic imaging techniques and histological evaluations were conducted to assess all bone defects in different experimental groups. The cell viability and cytotoxicity analysis showed that there was no significant cytotoxic effect associated with 5 and 15 mg/mL of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-bioglass 45S5, iron- bioglass 45S5, and bioglass 45S5. In vitro results showed that the expression level of osteogenic markers increased in yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-bioglass 45S5 (osteocalcin: 2.56-fold and alkaline phosphatase: 2.68-fold) and iron- bioglass 45S5 (osteocalcin: 2.44-fold and alkaline phosphatase: 3.84-fold) composite when compared to bioglass 45S5 (osteocalcin: 1.32-fold and alkaline phosphatase: 2.04-fold) and control group. The in vivo experiments confirmed the in vitro results and showed that iron- bioglass 45S5 (bone ingrowth%: 85.4 and bone volume/ total volume%: 60.2) significantly enhanced new bone formation followed by yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia-bioglass 45S5 (bone ingrowth %: 73.2 and bone volume/total volume (%): 53.4) when compared to bioglass 45S5 (bone ingrowth %: 35.6 and bone volume/total volume (%): 31.4) and untreated controls (bone ingrowth %: 17.2 and bone volume/total volume (%): 10.6). Based on the present results, yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia- and iron successfully increased the bone regenerative capacity of bioglass 45S5 which could be used as new additives in future commercial bone cement.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

JALILI, M., NAEINI, A. T., KHAFI, M. S. A., MYS, K., KHOSHZABAN, A. (2022). Effectiveness of Reinforced 45S5 Bioglass with Yttria-Stabilized Tetragonal Zirconia and Iron in the Regeneration of Rabbit Calvarial Defects. Acta Veterinaria Eurasia, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 1, 35–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/428031

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Abedi, G., Jahanshahi, A., Fathi, M. H., Haghdost, I. S., & Veshkini, A. (2014). Study of nano-hydroxyapatite/zirconia stabilized with yttria in bone healing: Histopathological study in rabbit model. Polish Journal of Pathology, 65(1), 40–47. [CrossRef] Afzal, A. (2014). Implantable zirconia bioceramics for bone repair and replacement: A chronological review. Materials Express, 4(1), 1–12. [CrossRef] Al-Harbi, N., Mohammed, H., Al-Hadeethi, Y., Bakry, A. S., Umar, A., Hussein, M. A., Abbassy, M. A., Vaidya, K. G., Berakdar, G. A., Mkawi, E. M., & Nune, M. (2021) Silica-based bioactive glasses and their applications in hard tissue regeneration: A review. Pharmaceuticals, 14(2), 75. [CrossRef] Baino, F., Hamzehlou, S., & Kargozar, S. (2018). Bioactive glasses: Where are we and where are we going? Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 9(1), 25. [CrossRef] Balogh, E., Tolnai, E., Nagy, B., Jr., Nagy, B., Balla, G., Balla, J., & Jeney, V. (2016). Iron overload inhibits osteogenic commitment and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via the induction of ferritin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1862(9), 1640–1649. [CrossRef] Bambini, F., Santarelli, A., Putignano, A., Procaccini, M., Orsini, G., Di Iorio, D., Memè, L., Sartini, D., Emanuelli, M., & Lo Muzio, L. (2017). Use of supercharged cover screw as static magnetic field generator for bone healing, 2nd part: In vivo enhancement of bone regeneration in rabbits. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents, 31(2), 481–485.
  2. Bargavi, P., Chitra, S., Durgalakshmi, D., Radha, G., & Balakumar, S. (2020). Zirconia reinforced bio-active glass coating by spray pyrolysis: Structure, surface topography, in-vitro biological evaluation and antibacterial activities. Materials Today Communications, 25. [CrossRef] Bellucci, D., Sola, A., & Cannillo, V. (2014). Bioactive glass/ZrO2 composites for orthopaedic applications. Biomedical Materials, 9(1), 015005. [CrossRef] Bellucci, D., Sola, A., & Cannillo, V. (2016). Hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate composites with bioactive glass as second phase: State of the art and current applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. Part A, 104(4), 1030–1056. [CrossRef] Best, S. M., Porter, A. E., Thian, E. S., & Huang, J. (2008). Bioceramics: Past, present and for the future. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 28(7), 1319–1327. [CrossRef] Betz, R. R. (2002). Limitations of autograft and allograft: New synthetic solutions. Orthopedics, 25(Suppl. 5), S561–