Dergiler / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2022 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1

The load transfer effect of monopolar and bipolar radial head prosthesis designs on capitellar cartilage: A comparative biomechanical cadaver study

Sayfa
58–63
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

No significant differences could be found between load transfer values of bipolar head design and monopolar head design except in the pronation at full extension.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether bipolar radial head arthroplasty may transfer less load to the capitellum than monopolar radial head arthroplasty and native radial heads.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Six human elbow joints were obtained from six fresh frozen cadavers (3 males, 3 females; mean age = 78 years, age range = 66-80).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:No significant differences could be found between load transfer values of bipolar head design and monopolar head design except in the pronation at full extension.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether bipolar radial head arthroplasty may transfer less load to the capitellum than monopolar radial head arthroplasty and native radial heads. Methods: Six human elbow joints were obtained from six fresh frozen cadavers (3 males, 3 females; mean age = 78 years, age range = 66-80). None of the elbow joints had a previous osseous injury, a chondral defect, osteoarthritis, or instability. In group 1, load transfer of the native radial head was measured in each specimen under 100 N of compression force using a custom-made load cell at 0°, 30°, 60°, 90°, and 120° flexion of the elbow in supination, neutral rotation, and pronation, respectively. After excision of the radial heads, the same testing protocol was first applied for monopolar radial head arthroplasty (Group 2) and then for bipolar radial head arthroplasty (Group 3). Results: The mean load transfer on the capitellum was significantly higher in each forearm rotation and all angles of the elbow flexion in the arthroplasty groups than the native radial head group. Mean load transfer values of bipolar prostheses were between the values of native radial heads and monopolar prostheses in all positions. Bipolar prostheses showed similar load transfer characteristics compared to those of the native radial head in supination at 60° flexion; in neutral rotation at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 120° flexion; and in pronation at 90° and 120° flexion. Conclusion: The results of this study have revealed that bipolar radial head arthroplasty transfers similar loading as the native radial head on the capitellum in certain forearm positions and at elbow flexion angles. No significant differences could be found between load transfer values of bipolar head design and monopolar head design except in the pronation at full extension.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜNAL, A. M., ÖZKAN, M., TURGUT, N., EKİN, A., AKDEMİR, M., AŞIK, M. O. (2022). The load transfer effect of monopolar and bipolar radial head prosthesis designs on capitellar cartilage: A comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 1, 58–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/427939

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Klug A, Gramlich Y, Wincheringer D, Hoffmann R, Schmidt-Horlohé K. Epidemiology and treatment of radial head fractures: A database analysis of over 70,000 inpatient cases. J Hand Surg Am. 2021
  2. 46(1):27-35. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020. 05.029 2. Cooney WP. Radial head fractures and the role of radial head prosthetic replacement: Current update. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2008
  3. 37(8 Suppl 1):21-25. 3. Van Riet RP, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Morrey BF. Failure of metal radial head replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010
  4. 92(5):661-667. 10.1302/0301-620X. 92B5.23067 4. Shore BJ, Mozzon JB, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, King GJW. Chronic posttraumatic elbow disorders treated with metallic radial head arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008
  5. 90(2):271-280. 10.2106/JBJS.F.01535 5. Flinkkilä T, Kaisto T, Sirniö K, Hyvönen P, Leppilahti J. Short- to mid-term results of metallic press-fit radial head arthroplasty in unstable injuries of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012
  6. 94 B(6):805-810. 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.28176 6. Viveen J, Kodde IF, Koenraadt KLM, Beumer A, The B, Eygendaal D. Clinical and radiographic outcome of revision surgery of radial head prostheses: Midterm results in 16 patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017
  7. 26(3):394-402. 10.1016/j. jse.2016.09.047 7. Bachman DR, Park S, Thaveepunsan S, Fitzsimmons JS, An K-N, OʼDriscoll SW. Joint contact changes with undersized prosthetic radial heads. J Orthop Trauma. 2018
  8. 32(11):e440-e444. 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001278 8. Bachman DR, Thaveepunsan S, Park S, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O’Driscoll SW. The effect of prosthetic radial head geometry on the distribution and magnitude of radiocapitellar joint contact pressures. J Hand Surg Am. 2015
  9. 40(2):281- 288. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.11.005 9. Lott A, Broder K, Goch A, Konda SR, Egol KA. Results after radial head arthroplasty in unstable fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2018
  10. 27(2):270-275. 10. 1016/j.jse.2017.10.011 10. Pomianowski S, Morrey BF, Neale PG, Park MJ, O’Driscoll SW, An KN. Contribution of monoblock and bipolar radial head prostheses to valgus stability of the elbow. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001
  11. 83(12):1829-1834. 10.2106/00004623- 200112000-00010 11. Chen H, Wang Z, Shang Y. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of unipolar and bipolar radial head prosthesis in patients with radial head fracture: A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Investig Surg. 2018
  12. 31(3):178-184. 10.1080/ 08941939.2017.1299262 12. Moon JG, Kim J-H, Jung YJ, Lim MJ, Lee H-D. Relationship between the tilt angle of b