Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5

There is No Remarkable Difference Between Pedicle Screw and Hybrid Construct in the Correction of Lenke Type-1 Curves

Sayfa
799–804
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Good results may be achieved with both techniques to provide sagittal balance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To compare the deformity correction success of segmental pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation for the treatment ofLenke type-1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves.MATERIAL and METHODS: Surgically treated Lenke type-1 scoliosis patients were retrospectively evaluated and data of 26patients treated with hybrid instrumentation were included in the first group.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this group, all patients had been operated withhooks at the thoracic part and transpedicular screws at the lumbar part.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Good results may be achieved with both techniques to provide sagittal balance.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To compare the deformity correction success of segmental pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation for the treatment ofLenke type-1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) curves.MATERIAL and METHODS: Surgically treated Lenke type-1 scoliosis patients were retrospectively evaluated and data of 26patients treated with hybrid instrumentation were included in the first group. In this group, all patients had been operated withhooks at the thoracic part and transpedicular screws at the lumbar part. The second group included 26 patients operated with allsegment transpedicular screws. Cobb angles of curves, flexibility, apical vertebral translation (AVT), coronal body balance, kyphosisand lordosis were measured. All measurements and correction ratios were compared between the groups.RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for preoperative thoracic and lumbar Cobb angles,thoracic and lumbar curve flexibility, coronal balance, AVT, kyphosis and lordosis. However, the postoperative thoracic correctionratio was significantly different between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Segmental screw instrumentation had better results for thoracic curve correction than hybrid instrumentation forthe treatment of Lenke type-1 curves. Good results may be achieved with both techniques to provide sagittal balance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SERARSLAN, U., ALICI, E., AKÇALI, Ö., KOŞAY, M. C., ÜNAL, A. M., GÜLTEKİN, A. (2018). There is No Remarkable Difference Between Pedicle Screw and Hybrid Construct in the Correction of Lenke Type-1 Curves. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 5, 799–804. https://ajindex.com/articles/404496

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Cao Y, Xiong W, Li F: Pedicle screw versus hybrid construct instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 39: 800-810, 2014
  2. Crawford AH, Lykissas MG, Gao X, Eismann E, Anadio J: Allpedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 38:1199-1208, 2013
  3. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Kim J Bridwell KH, Cho SK, Cheh G, Sides B: Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hybrid instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31: 291-298, 2006
  4. Lykissas MG, Jain VV, Nathan ST, Pawar V, Eismann EA, Sturm PF, Crawford AH: Mid- to long-term outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following instrumented posterior spinal fusion: A meta-analysis. Spine 38:113-119, 2013
  5. Newton PO, Marks MC, Bastrom TP, Betz R, Clements D, Lonner B Crawford A, Shufflebarger H, OʼBrien M, Yaszay B; Harms Study Group: Surgical treatment of Lenke 1 main thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 38: 328-338,2013
  6. Rafi S, Munshi N, Abbas A, Shaikh RH, Hashmi I: Comparative analysis of pedicle versus hybrid instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. J Neurosci Rural Pract 7:550-553, 2016
  7. Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, Chung YJ, Park YB: Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20:1399-1405, 1995
  8. Westrick ER, Ward WT: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 5-year to 20-year evidence-based surgical results. J Pediatr Orthop 31:61–68, 2011
  9. Yilmaz G, Borkhuu B, Dhawale AA, Oto M, Littleton AG, Mason DE, Gabos PG, Shah SA: Comparative analysis of hook, hybrid and pedicle screw instrumentation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 32:490- 499, 2012