Dergiler / Politeknik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Finite Element Analyzing of the Effect of Crack on Mechanical Behavior of Honeycomb and Re-entrant Structures

Sayfa
1015–1025
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a result, the only possible fracture in honeycomb for thickness of 1 mm might be observed owing to stress intensity factor obtained from analyses bigger than fracture toughness of honeycomb structure.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Developments in technology require the new materials, lighter and more efficient structures and also new manufacturing methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, after doing researches about topology optimization, regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures; the regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures were designed, and then Ti-6Al-4V material was chosen for these structures in finite element (FE) analyzing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a result, the only possible fracture in honeycomb for thickness of 1 mm might be observed owing to stress intensity factor obtained from analyses bigger than fracture toughness of honeycomb structure.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Auxetic behavior · crack · negative Poisson’s ratio

Özet

Developments in technology require the new materials, lighter and more efficient structures and also new manufacturing methods. In this study, after doing researches about topology optimization, regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures; the regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures were designed, and then Ti-6Al-4V material was chosen for these structures in finite element (FE) analyzing. The three different rib thickness values (t) of 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm were assigned for honeycomb and re-entrant structures in FE analyses. Also, the crack was created on the models, and then 2-D FE analyses were done for both cracked and un-cracked honeycomb and re-entrant structures under tensile forces through y axis. Afterwards, the effect of crack on stress intensity factor, stresses, strains and displacement were obtained and characterized the auxetic behavior of the regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures. Furthermore, increase in rib thickness decreases stress and strains for each structure. Moreover, re-entrant structures have negative Poisson’s ratio due to their geometric properties and the notable effect of crack on the equivalent stress in re-entrant was emerged in comparison with honeycomb structure. As a result, the only possible fracture in honeycomb for thickness of 1 mm might be observed owing to stress intensity factor obtained from analyses bigger than fracture toughness of honeycomb structure.

Abstract

Developments in technology require the new materials, lighter and more efficient structures and also new manufacturing methods. In this study, after doing researches about topology optimization, regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures; the regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures were designed, and then Ti-6Al-4V material was chosen for these structures in finite element (FE) analyzing. The three different rib thickness values (t) of 1 mm, 1.5 mm and 2 mm were assigned for honeycomb and re-entrant structures in FE analyses. Also, the crack was created on the models, and then 2-D FE analyses were done for both cracked and un-cracked honeycomb and re-entrant structures under tensile forces through y axis. Afterwards, the effect of crack on stress intensity factor, stresses, strains and displacement were obtained and characterized the auxetic behavior of the regular honeycomb and re-entrant structures. Furthermore, increase in rib thickness decreases stress and strains for each structure. Moreover, re-entrant structures have negative Poisson’s ratio due to their geometric properties and the notable effect of crack on the equivalent stress in re-entrant was emerged in comparison with honeycomb structure. As a result, the only possible fracture in honeycomb for thickness of 1 mm might be observed owing to stress intensity factor obtained from analyses bigger than fracture toughness of honeycomb structure.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERGENE, B., YALÇIN, B. (2020). Finite Element Analyzing of the Effect of Crack on Mechanical Behavior of Honeycomb and Re-entrant Structures. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 1015–1025. https://ajindex.com/articles/422453

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Lakes R., “Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratios”, Science, 235:1038–1040, (1987
  2. Undershill R.S., “Defense applications of auxetic materials”, Advanced Materials, 1(1):7-12, (2014
  3. Novak N., Vesenjak M., Ren Z, “Auxetic cellular materials - a review”, Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 62(9): 485-493, (2016
  4. Scarpa F., Smith F.C., “Passive and MR fluid-coated auxetic PU foam –mechanical, acoustic, and electromagnetic properties”, Int. Journal Mater. Syst. Struct., 15: 973–979, (2004
  5. Yang L., Harrysson O., West H., Cormier D., “Mechanical properties of 3D re-entrant honeycomb auxetic structures realized via additive manufacturing”, Int. Journal of Solids and Structures, 69–70: 475–490, (2015
  6. Choy Y.S., Sun C.N., Leonga K.F., Weia J., “Compressive properties of Ti-6Al-4V lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting: Design, orientation and density”, Additive Manufacturing, 16: 213–224, (2017
  7. Yan C., Hao L., Hussein A., Young P., Raymont D., “Advanced lightweight 316Lstainless steel cellular lattice structures fabricated via selective laser melting”, Materials&Design, 55: 533–541, (2014
  8. Prawota Y., “Solid Mechanics for Materials Engineers: Auxetic Materials Seen from the Mechanics Point of View, Chapter 15”, USA (2013)
  9. Alderson A., and Alderson K.L., “Auxetic materials”, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 221 G: 565-575, (2007
  10. Budarapu P.R., Sudhir Sastry Y.B., Natarajan R., “Design concepts of an aircraft wing: composite and morphing airfoil with auxetic structures”, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 10(4): 394–408, (2016
  11. Critchley R., Corni I., Wharton J.A., Walsh F.C., Wood R.J.K., Stokes K.R., “The preparation of auxetic foams by three-dimensional printing and their characteristics”, Adv. Eng. Mat., 15 (10): 980–985, (2013
  12. Maiti K., Ashby M.F., Gibson L.J., “Fracture toughness of brittle cellular solids”, Scripta Metallurgica, 18: 213-217, (1984
  13. Green D., “Fabrication and mechanical properties of lightweight ceramics produced by sintering of hollow spheres”, Journal of Am. Ceram. Soc., 68: 403–409, (1985
  14. Choi J., and Lakes R, “Fracture toughness of re-entrant foam materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio: Experiment and analysis”, Int. Journal of Fracture, 80: 73–83, (1986
  15. Yang L., Harrysson O., West H., Cormier D., “Compressive properties of Ti–6Al–4V auxetic mesh structures made by electron beam melting”, Acta Materialia, 60: 3370–3379, (2012
  16. Ingrole A., H