KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Politeknik Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Efficiency Analysis of Science and Technology Parks Using Data Envelopment Analysis: Evidence from Turkey

Necla ARSLAN
Önder BELGİN
Sayfa
1667–1674
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The motivation of this study is contributing to policies for increasing the performance and the impact of the STPs in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Research and Development (R&D) and innovation have a significant impact on the competitiveness of countries.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Science and Technology Parks (STPs) are an important component of R&D and innovation ecosystems of countries and they aim to increase the university-industry collaboration.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The motivation of this study is contributing to policies for increasing the performance and the impact of the STPs in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Science and technology parks · data envelopment analysis · cluster analysis

Özet

Research and Development (R&D) and innovation have a significant impact on the competitiveness of countries. Science and Technology Parks (STPs) are an important component of R&D and innovation ecosystems of countries and they aim to increase the university-industry collaboration. This study addresses the efficiency analysis of STPs in Turkey using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). For this purpose, an input-oriented DEA model is used to obtain efficiency scores of STPs and 5 of 22 STPs are found to be efficient. After that, to examine the strong and weak areas of STPs six additional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models are considered. According to these models, STPs exhibits lower performance in the efficiency of revenue and patents. Finally, STPs are clustered based on efficiency scores as Marketers, Researchers and Low-performers using K-means clustering and we made suggestions for each cluster. The motivation of this study is contributing to policies for increasing the performance and the impact of the STPs in Turkey.

Abstract

Research and Development (R&D) and innovation have a significant impact on the competitiveness of countries. Science and Technology Parks (STPs) are an important component of R&D and innovation ecosystems of countries and they aim to increase the university-industry collaboration. This study addresses the efficiency analysis of STPs in Turkey using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). For this purpose, an input-oriented DEA model is used to obtain efficiency scores of STPs and 5 of 22 STPs are found to be efficient. After that, to examine the strong and weak areas of STPs six additional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models are considered. According to these models, STPs exhibits lower performance in the efficiency of revenue and patents. Finally, STPs are clustered based on efficiency scores as Marketers, Researchers and Low-performers using K-means clustering and we made suggestions for each cluster. The motivation of this study is contributing to policies for increasing the performance and the impact of the STPs in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARSLAN, N., BELGİN, Ö. (2021). Efficiency Analysis of Science and Technology Parks Using Data Envelopment Analysis: Evidence from Turkey. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 1667–1674. https://ajindex.com/articles/422203

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (17)

  1. Hobbs, K.G., Link, A.N. and Scott, J.T., “Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 42: 957–76, (2017).
  2. Hu, J-L., Yeh, F-Y. and Chang, I-T., “Industrial park efficiency in Taiwan”, Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 30(1): 63-86, (2009).
  3. Hu, J-L., Han, T-F., Yeh, F-Y. and Lu, C-L., “Efficiency of science and technology industrial parks in China”, Journal of Management Research, 10(3): 151-166, (2010).
  4. Farrell, M. J., “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120: 253-290, (1957).
  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E., “Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units”, European Journal of Operational Research, 2: 429-444, (1978).
  6. Banker R.D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W., “Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science, 30(9): 1078-1092, (1984).
  7. Hirschberg, J.G. and Lye, J.N., “Clustering in data envelopment analysis using bootstrapped efficiency scores”, Papers 800, Department of Economics, Melbourne, (2001).
  8. Sherman, H.D. and Zhu, J., “Service productivity management: Improving service performance using data Envelopment analysis (DEA)”, Springer, New York, (2006).
  9. Lemos, C.A.A., Lins, M.P.E. and Ebecken, N.F.F., “DEA implementation and clustering analysis using the K-means algorithm”, Data Mining VI, WIT Press, Brazil, (2005).
  10. Bougnol M-L., Dula, J.H., EstellitaLins, M.P. and Moreira da Silva, A.C., “Enhancing standard performance practices with DEA”, Omega, 38(1–2): 33-45, (2010).
  11. Maghyereh, A. I. and Awartani, B., “The effect of market structure, regulation, and risk on banks efficiency: Evidence from the Gulf cooperation council countries”, Journal of Economic Studies, 41(3): 405-430, (2014).
  12. Cook, W.D., Seiford, L.M., “Data envelopment analysis (DEA) – thirty years on”, European Journal of Operations Research, 192(1): 1–17, (2009).
  13. Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y.Y., Lu, W.-M., Lin, B.J.Y., “Data envelopment analysis 1978–2010: a citation-based literature survey”. Omega, 41(1): 3–15, (2013).
  14. Liu, J.S., Lu, L.Y.Y., Lu, W.-M., Lin, B.J.Y., “A survey of DEA applications”, Omega, 41(5): 893–902, (2013).
  15. Fraley, C. and Raftery, A.E., “Model-based clustering, discriminant analysis, and density estimation”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(458): 611-631, (2002).
  16. Alpaydin, E., “Introduction to machine learning”, The MIT Press, London, (2014).
  17. Jain, A., Murty,