Dergiler / Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of forensic cases presented to the pediatric emergency department

Sayfa
137–142
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our third yet most important result is that early pregnancy is a much ignored social problem despite its importance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: Child forensic cases constitute an essential part of emergency presentations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:METHODS: This retrospective study consists of forensic cases aged from 1 month to 18 years and presented to the pediatric emergency service of Adana City Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our third yet most important result is that early pregnancy is a much ignored social problem despite its importance.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

OBJECTIVE: Child forensic cases constitute an essential part of emergency presentations. The most crucial point is that the correct planning of protective and preventive activities depends on the correct analysis of the problem; therefore, there is a need for studies on childhood forensic cases. This study aimed to obtain data on the etiological characteristics of forensic cases presented to the pediatric emergency department. We believe that the collected data will guide the social measures in preventing forensic cases. METHODS: This retrospective study consists of forensic cases aged from 1 month to 18 years and presented to the pediatric emergency service of Adana City Training and Research Hospital between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. The general forensic examination report of the cases was surveyed. RESULTS: For this study, 6577 general forensic examination reports were surveyed. 40% of the patients were females, and 60% were males. Traffic accidents were the most common (35.1%) cause of the emergency presentation, which was followed by assault (16.5%), fall from height (9.2%), accidental drug‑caustic corrosive substance intake (7.8%), early pregnancy (7.4%), blunt or sharp force injuries (6.3%), electrical burn injuries (5.7%), suicide (5.1%), carbon monoxide‑food poisoning (2.7%), and others that consisted of work accident, firearm injury, substance ingestion, suffocation, animal attack, sudden death, and missing child (4.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This most extensive study with 6577 cases has several important implications. First of all, traffic accidents continue to be an important public health problem today. Second, cases presented to the emergency department due to assault and blunt or sharp force injuries constitute an important part of forensic cases, and children who are driven to violence and crime in childhood are a situation that requires immediate action. Our third yet most important result is that early pregnancy is a much ignored social problem despite its importance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TOLUNAY, İ., DEMİR, K. İ. (2022). Evaluation of forensic cases presented to the pediatric emergency department. Turkish journal of emergency medicine (Online), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 137–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/418858

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Saka NE. Overview of clinical applications in forensic medicine and forensic sciences. In: Şahin Y, editor. Preparations of forensic reports in forensic cases. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitapevi; 2019. p. 1‑14
  2. Dokgöz H. Forensic medicine forensic sciences. In: Dokgöz H, Koçak U, editors. Forensic sciences. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitapevi; 2019. p. 1‑29
  3. Eroğlu SE, Toprak SN, Karataş AD, Onur Ö, Özpolat Ç, Salçın E, et al. What is the meaning of temporary forensic reports for emergency physicians? Self protection? Bias? Habit? Turk J Emerg Med 2013;13:13‑8
  4. Erdoğan Çetin Z, Teyin A, Birben B, Çetin B, Şahiner GG, Hamacı M. Evaluation of judical reports prepared in the emergency department. Bozok Med J 2018;8:34‑40
  5. Hakkoymaz H, Keten HS, Artuç S, Üçer H, Bozkurt S, Okumuş M, et al. Evaluation of medicolegal reports in respect of the turkısh penal code. J Kartal TR 2014;25:177‑80
  6. Dokgöz H. Forensic medicine & forensic science. In: Pakiş I, Koç S, editors. Child deaths. Ankara: Akademisyen Kitapevi; 2019. p. 1‑29
  7. Baldwin GT. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. National action plan for child injury prevention. Atlata (GA): CDC, NCIPC; 2012
  8. Kadıoğlu E. Pediatric forensic cases: An emergency department experience. J For Med 2018;32:1‑9
  9. Büken E, Yaşar ZF. Assessment of forensic children cases applyig to the emergency servise of Başkent University Ankara Hospital. Bull Legal Med 2015;20:93‑8
  10. Borse NN, Gilchrist J, Dellinger AM, Rudd RA, Ballesteros MF, Sleet DA. CDC childhood injury report: Patterns of unintentional injuries among 0‑19 years olds in the United States, 2000‑2006. Atlanta (GA): CDC, NCIPC; 2008
  11. Yazar A, Akın F, Türe E, Odabaş D. Evaluation of forensic cases admitting to pediatric emergency clinic. Dicle Med J 2017;44:345‑53
  12. Demir ÖF, Aydın K, Turan F, Yurteseven A, Erbil B, Gülalp B. Analysis of pediatric forensic cases presented to emergency department. Turk Arch Ped 2013;(48):235‑40
  13. Korkmaz T, Erkol Z, Kahramansoy N. Evaluation of pediatric forensic cases in emergency department: A retrospective study. Med Bull Haseki 2014;52:271‑7
  14. Tercan E, Beşdok E. Evaluation of relations between factors affecting traffic accidents by PCA biplot analaysis method. Iğdır Univ J Inst Sci Tech 2018;8:103‑11
  15. Sever M, Ulaş Saz E, Koşargelir M. An evaluation of the pediatric medicolegal admissions to a tertiary hospital emergency department. J Trauma Emerg S