Dergiler / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4

YouTube as a source of information: How good is the quality and reliability of videos related to obsessive compulsive disorder?

Sayfa
368–374
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Greater participation of mental health professionals could help to ensure access to high quality information on OCD, which could be of great benefit to patients and the public.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: YouTube (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), an online video-sharing platform, has become a resource for health information.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 131 English-language videos related to OCD available on YouTube were reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Greater participation of mental health professionals could help to ensure access to high quality information on OCD, which could be of great benefit to patients and the public.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: YouTube (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), an online video-sharing platform, has become a resource for health information. However, the quality of the information presented to viewers is not well known. This study is an examination of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of YouTube videos related to obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and provides analysis of data of the number of views and the relationship between the popularity and quality of videos related to OCD. Method: This was a qualitative, cross-sectional study. A total of 131 English-language videos related to OCD available on YouTube were reviewed. The DISCERN questionnaire, the Global Quality Scale (GQS), and a YouTube OCD-Specific Score instrument were used to evaluate the videos. Details of the length of the videos, the number of views, the number of likes/ dislikes, and the length of time since upload were analyzed. Results: The source of the videos was most often a psychiatrist/psychologist (n=63, 48.1%), followed by an educational course (n=21, 16%), and patients/relatives (n=16, 12.2%). Most of the videos were of low quality. The DISCERN instrument ratings indicated that only 36.6% of the videos were of fair quality, and GQS assessment revealed that only 27.5% of videos scored ≥3 points. Conclusion: The OCD-related video content reviewed was largely inadequate. Information on the disease and distinction between symptoms, as well as treatment options, was insufficient. YouTube is a widely used information resource. Greater participation of mental health professionals could help to ensure access to high quality information on OCD, which could be of great benefit to patients and the public.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYA, H., KAHVE, A. C., BÜLBÜL, A. (2021). YouTube as a source of information: How good is the quality and reliability of videos related to obsessive compulsive disorder?. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 4, 368–374. https://ajindex.com/articles/418635

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Prestin A, Vieux SN, Chou W-YS. Is online health activity alive and well or flatlining? Findings from 10 years of the health information national trends survey. J Health Commun 2015; 20:790-798
  2. McDaid, D, Park A. Online health: Untangling the web. evidence from the bupa health pulse 2010 international healthcare survey. Bupa Health Pulse survey and results © 2010 The British United Provident Association Limited. All other content in this report © 2010 LSE Enterprise Limited.London, Bupa. Zugriff am, 16, 2011
  3. Akerkar SM, Kanitkar M, Bichile L. Use of the Internet as a resource of health information by patients: a clinic-based study in the Indian population. J Postgrad Med 2005; 51:116
  4. Lawlor E, Breslin JG, Renwick L, Foley S, Mulkerrin U, Kinsella A, et al. Mental health literacy among Internet users. Early Interv Psychiatry 2008; 2:247-255
  5. Ma H, Lum C, Dai L, Kwok C, Woo J. Potentially inappropriate medication in elderly patients in outpatient clinics. Asian J Gerontol Geriatr 2008; 3:27-33
  6. YouTube by the numbers: Stats, demographics & fun facts. https://www.omnicoreagency.com/youtube-statistics/. Accessed March 1, 2021
  7. Bae SS, Baxter S. YouTube videos in the English language as a patient education resource for cataract surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2018; 38:1941-1945
  8. Szmuda T, Rosvall P, Hetzger TV, Ali S, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of patient information for hydrocephalus: a contentquality and optimization analysis. World Neurosurg 2020; 138:e469-e477
  9. Crino R, Slade T, Andrews G. The changing prevalence and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder criteria from DSM-III to DSM-IV. Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162:876-882
  10. Ruscio AM, Stein DJ, Chiu WT, Kessler RC. The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Mol Psychiatry 2010; 15:53-63
  11. Bobes J, González M, Bascaran M, Arango C, Saiz P, Bousono M. Quality of life and disability in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2001; 16:239-245
  12. Stein MB, Forde DR, Anderson G, Walker JR. Obsessivecompulsive disorder in the community: an epidemiologic survey with clinical reappraisal. Am J Psychiatry 1997; 154:1120-1126
  13. Torres AR, Prince MJ, Bebbington PE, Bhugra D, Brugha TS, Farrell M, et al. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: prevalence, comorbidity, impact, and help-seeking in the British National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey of 2000. Am J Psychiatry 2006; 163:1978-1985
  14. Khazaal Y, Chatton A