Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Neuronavigation and Frame-Based Stereotactic Systems in Implanting Epileptic Depth Electrodes

Sayfa
574–581
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: Imaging navigation provides better means of depth electrode implantation; its implantation accuracy is similar to that of the frame-based stereotactic method and it is less time consuming and causes less complications, and is especially suitable for stereoelectroencephalography, which requires multiple depth electrodes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To investigate the application of neuronavigation in the implantation of depth electrodes in patients with epilepsy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:RESULTS: In the imaging navigation group, patients were implanted with 2-14 depth electrodes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: Imaging navigation provides better means of depth electrode implantation; its implantation accuracy is similar to that of the frame-based stereotactic method and it is less time consuming and causes less complications, and is especially suitable for stereoelectroencephalography, which requires multiple depth electrodes.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To investigate the application of neuronavigation in the implantation of depth electrodes in patients with epilepsy. MATERIAL and METHODS: Thirty-six patients with epilepsy who were implanted with depth electrodes using neuronavigation were assessed for accuracy of implantation and associated complications. RESULTS: In the imaging navigation group, patients were implanted with 2-14 depth electrodes. The average number of implantations was 4.8 electrodes/case. The average implantation error was 2.03 ± 0.98 mm, exhibiting no significant difference compared to the frame-based stereotactic group. In the imaging group, an average of 19.4 min was required to implant each electrode, which was significantly shorter than the time required in the frame group (34.5 min). The temporal lobe was elucidated as the factor that affects electrode implantation accuracy. One patient in the imaging group exhibited a small amount of bleeding, and one suffered from cerebrospinal fluid leakage; however, the overall complication rate in the imaging group was lower than that in the frame group. CONCLUSION: Imaging navigation provides better means of depth electrode implantation; its implantation accuracy is similar to that of the frame-based stereotactic method and it is less time consuming and causes less complications, and is especially suitable for stereoelectroencephalography, which requires multiple depth electrodes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOU, Z., CHEN, X., SHI, X., AN, N., YANG, M., YANG, H., ZHANG, D., LIU, S. (2016). Comparison of Neuronavigation and Frame-Based Stereotactic Systems in Implanting Epileptic Depth Electrodes. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 574–581. https://ajindex.com/articles/417680

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Bararo NM: Stereoelectroencephalography using computerized tomography-or magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrode implantation. J Neurosurg 104(4):480-482, 2006 2. Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, Casaceli G, Schiariti MP, Miserocchi A, Fuschillo D, Moscato A, Caborni C, Arnulfo G, Lo Russo G: Stereoelectroencephalography: Surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery 72(3):353-366, 2013 3. Centeno RS, Yacubian EM, Caboclo LO, Junior HC, Cavalheiro S: Intracranial depth electrodes implantation in the era of image-guided surgery. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 69(4):693-698, 2011 4. Cossu M, Cardinale F, Castana L, Citterio A, Francione S, Tassi L, Benabid AL, Lo Russo G: Stereoelectroencephalography in the presurgical evaluation of focal epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of 215 procedures. Neurosurgery 57(4):706-718, 2005 5. Cossu M, Cardinale F, Castana L, Nobili L, Sartori I, Lo Russo G: Stereo-EEG in children. Childs Nerv Syst 22(8):766-778, 2006 6. Dalal SS, Edwards E, Kirsch HE, Barbaro NM, Knight RT, Nagarajan SS: Localization of neurosurgically implanted electrodes via photograph-MRI-radiograph coregistration. J Neurosci Methods 174(1):106-115, 2008 7. De Almeida AN, Olivier A, Quesney F, Dubeau F, Savard G, Andermann F: Efficacy of and morbidity associated with stereoelectroencephalography using computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging-guided electrode implantation. J Neurosurg 104(4):483-487, 2006 8. Gonzalez-Martinez J, Mullin J, Vadera S, Bulacio J, Hughes G, Jones S, Enatsu R, Najm I: Stereotactic placement of depth electrodes in medically 9. Guenot M, Isnard J, Ryvlin P, Fischer C, Ostrowsky K, Mauguiere F, Sindou M: Neurophysiological monitoring for epilepsy surgery: The Talairach SEEG method. Stereo Electro Encephalo Graphy. Indications, results, complications and therapeutic applications in a series of 100 consecutive cases. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 77(1-4):29-32, 2001 10. Kahane P, Landre E, Minotti L, Francione S, Ryvlin P: The Bancaud and Talairach view on the epileptogenic zone: A working hypothesis. Epileptic Disord 8:S16-S26, 2006 11. McGonigal A, Bartolomei F, Regis J, Guye M, Gavaret M, Trébuchon-Da Fonseca A, Dufour H, Figarella-Branger D, Girard N, Péragut JC, Chauvel P: Stereoelectroencephalography in presurgical assessment of MRI-negative epilepsy. Brain 130(Pt 12):3169-3183, 2007 12. McGonigal A, Gavaret M, Da Fonseca AT, Guye M, Scavarda D, Villeneuve N, Régis J,