Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Radiological and Surgical Anatomy of Ventral C1-C2 Complex

Sayfa
222–228
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Theangles of transoral and transnasal approaches to C1 were 32.67 ± 4.59° and 32.00 ± 2.10°, respectively.CONCLUSION: A safe transoral or transnasal odontoidectomy requires accurate measurements and imaging regarding ventral C1-C2 relationships, distances of odontoid, lateral mass and midline.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To evaluate anatomical data of the bony structures during exploration of the C1-C2 complex.MATERIAL and METHODS: This study included six formalin-fixed cadaveric head and neck specimens.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Radiological images andanatomical measurements included: C1-C2 distance, bony distance between C1 anterior tubercle-nares and superior incisors,height of C1 anterior arch, and height and width of odontoid articular surface.RESULTS: The mean distance between C1 anterior tubercle-nares and superior incisors on maxilla were 96.16 ± 8.07 mm and84.14 ± 9.16 mm, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Theangles of transoral and transnasal approaches to C1 were 32.67 ± 4.59° and 32.00 ± 2.10°, respectively.CONCLUSION: A safe transoral or transnasal odontoidectomy requires accurate measurements and imaging regarding ventral C1-C2 relationships, distances of odontoid, lateral mass and midline.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To evaluate anatomical data of the bony structures during exploration of the C1-C2 complex.MATERIAL and METHODS: This study included six formalin-fixed cadaveric head and neck specimens. Radiological images andanatomical measurements included: C1-C2 distance, bony distance between C1 anterior tubercle-nares and superior incisors,height of C1 anterior arch, and height and width of odontoid articular surface.RESULTS: The mean distance between C1 anterior tubercle-nares and superior incisors on maxilla were 96.16 ± 8.07 mm and84.14 ± 9.16 mm, respectively. The mean height of C1 anterior arch was 13.89 mm. The meandistance between medial borders ofright-left C1 lateral masses was 19.10 ± 1.80 mm. The mean distance between medial border of lateral midline on mass right andleft sides were 9.43 ± 0.88 mm and 9.68 ± 0.97 mm, respectively. The mean height of C1 anterior arch at midline was 13.89 ± 2.48mm, and the mean distance between ventral surface of anterior arch and ventral joint of odontoid at midline was 6.43 ± 1.29 mm.The anteroposterior, horizontal diameters of odontoid on its base were 12.12 ± 0.38 mm, and 11.12 ± 0.94 mm, respectively. Theangles of transoral and transnasal approaches to C1 were 32.67 ± 4.59° and 32.00 ± 2.10°, respectively.CONCLUSION: A safe transoral or transnasal odontoidectomy requires accurate measurements and imaging regarding ventral C1-C2 relationships, distances of odontoid, lateral mass and midline.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇIRPAN, S., SAYHAN, S., YONGUC, G. N., EYUBOGLU, C., KARABAY, N., GÜVENÇER, M., NADERİ, S. (2019). Radiological and Surgical Anatomy of Ventral C1-C2 Complex. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 222–228. https://ajindex.com/articles/417650

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Ai F, Yin Q, Wang Z, Xia H, Chang Y, Wu Z, Liu J: Applied anatomy of transoral atlantoaxial reduction plate internal fixation. Spine 31(2):128-132, 2006 2. Baird CJ, Conway JE, Sciubba DM, Prevedello DM, QuiñonesHinojosa A, Kassam AB: Radiographic and anatomic base of endoscopic anterior craniocervical decompression: A comparison of endonasal, transoral, and transcervical approaches. Neurosurg 65:158-163, 2009 3. Blagg SE, Don ASD, Robertson PA: Anatomic determination of optimal entry point and direction for C1 lateral mass screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:233-239, 2009 4. Chan AK, Benet A, Ohya J, Zhang X, Vogel TD, Flis DW, El-Sayed IH, Mummaneni PV: The endoscopic transoral approach to the craniovertebral junction: An anatomical study with a clinical example. Neurosurg Focus 40(2):E11, 2016 5. Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch JJ, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL: C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement. Spine 32:844-848, 2007 6. De Almedia JR, Zanation AM, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Prevedello DM, Gardner PA, Kassam AB: Defining the nasopalatine line: The limit for endonasal surgery of the spine. Laryngoscope 119: 239-244, 2009 7. Doherty BJ, Heggenes MH: The quantitative anatomy of the atlas. Spine 22: 2497-2500, 1994 8. Gosavi SN, Vatsalaswamy P: Morphometric study of the atlas vertebra using manual method. Malays Orthop J 6:18-20, 2012 9. Gupta T: Cadaveric morphometric anatomy of C-1 vertebra in relation to lateral mass screw placement. Surg Radiol Anat 30(7):589-593, 2008 10. Hu Y, Yang S, Xie H, He X, Xu R, Ma W, Feng J, Chen Q: The anatomic study on replacement of artificial atlanto-odontoid joint through transoral approach. J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 28:327-332, 2008 11. Kandziora F, Schulze-Stahl N, Khodadadyan-Klostermann C, Schröder R, Mittmeier T: Screw placement in transoral atlantoaxial plating systems: An anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 95(1):80-87, 2001 12. Lu B, He XJ, Zhao CG, Li HP, Wang D: Artificial atlantoodontoid joint replacement through a transoral approach. Eur Spine J 18: 109-117, 2009 13. Rocha R, Safavi-Abbasi S, Reis C, Theodore N, Bambakidis N, de Oliveira E, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR: Working area, safety zones, and angles of approach for posterior C-1 lateral mass screw placement: A quantitative anatomical and morphometric evaluation. J Neurosurg Spine 6:247-254, 2007 14. Tun K, Kaptanoglu E, Cemil B, Karahan ST, Esmer AF, Elhan A: A neurosurgical view of anatomical evaluation