Dergiler / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2016 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

Soul of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education?

Sayfa
1030–1041
Yayın Tarihi
2016-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Entrepreneurial education has recently been added to the program at Trakya University, and positive results from this study will help to show the effectiveness of these courses.The study found that students who have been in receipt of an entrepreneurial education have deeper entrepreneurial intentions to take action when compared with students who were not in receipt of an entrepreneurial education.Besides, it was found that the percentage of those who are unclear as to whether to establish their own business or not, in terms of all the students who took an entrepreneurship course and those who did not, is rather high; besides, 23% of the students think that entrepreneurship can be learned.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In the last twenty years, entrepreneurship education has developed greatly in developed countries and it is quite effective in terms of entrepreneurial intention.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This study aims to find out to what extent entrepreneurial education affects the entrepreneurial intentions of students at Trakya University.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Entrepreneurial education has recently been added to the program at Trakya University, and positive results from this study will help to show the effectiveness of these courses.The study found that students who have been in receipt of an entrepreneurial education have deeper entrepreneurial intentions to take action when compared with students who were not in receipt of an entrepreneurial education.Besides, it was found that the percentage of those who are unclear as to whether to establish their own business or not, in terms of all the students who took an entrepreneurship course and those who did not, is rather high; besides, 23% of the students think that entrepreneurship can be learned.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Entrepreneurship · Entrepreneurial Education · Entrepreneurial Intention

Abstract

In the last twenty years, entrepreneurship education has developed greatly in developed countries and it is quite effective in terms of entrepreneurial intention. This study aims to find out to what extent entrepreneurial education affects the entrepreneurial intentions of students at Trakya University. Entrepreneurial education has recently been added to the program at Trakya University, and positive results from this study will help to show the effectiveness of these courses.The study found that students who have been in receipt of an entrepreneurial education have deeper entrepreneurial intentions to take action when compared with students who were not in receipt of an entrepreneurial education.Besides, it was found that the percentage of those who are unclear as to whether to establish their own business or not, in terms of all the students who took an entrepreneurship course and those who did not, is rather high; besides, 23% of the students think that entrepreneurship can be learned.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LORCU, F., ERDURAN, G. Y. (2016). Soul of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurship education?. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 1030–1041. https://ajindex.com/articles/414577

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Akin HB, Demirel Y 2015. Entrepreneurship education and perception change: the preliminary outcomes of compulsory entrepreneurship course experience in Turkey. Selcuk University Social Science Journals, 34:15-26 Akudolu LR 2010. A curriculum framework for entrepreneurship education in Nigeria. Unizik Orient Journal of Education, 5: 1-16. Allen K. 2006. Launching New Ventures. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Autio E, Keeley RH., Klofsten M, Ulfstedt T 1997. Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing and intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Proceedings Book. From (Retrieved May 18, 2015).
  2. Autio, E., Keeley, R.H., Klofsten, M., & Ulfstedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing and intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley MA, Babson College. Autio, E., Keeley, R.H., Klofsten, M., & Ulfstedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing and intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley MA, Babson College. Autio, E., Keeley, R.H., Klofsten, M., & Ulfstedt, T. (1997). Entrepreneurial intent among students: Testing and intent model in Asia, Scandinavia, and USA. Paper presented at the Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley MA, Babson College. Bandura A 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co. Bayraktaroglu S, Ozdemir Y 2010. Local entrepreneurial dynamics: Adapazari in understanding the method of oral history of the furniture industry. Journal of Management Sciences, 8: 51-80. Bird B 1988. Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention,. The Academy of Management Review, 13: 442-453. Birkan I 2014. Ankara Kultur ve Sanat Gunleri - Moderator, Ankara Muzelerinde Efsane Kral Midas ve Frigya’nın Izleri, Atilim Universitesi, Ankara, 16 Aralik. Boyd NG, Vozikis GS 1994. The influence of self-efficacy on the development of entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18: 64-77.
  3. Brouwer, MT 2002.
  4. Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12: 83-105.
  5. Carikci İH, Koyuncu O 2010. A research on to determine the relationship between the individualist – collectivist culture and entrepreneurial trends. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 3: 1-18. Cetinkaya BO 20