Dergiler / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2026 / Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3

Building digital business ecosystem resilience through orchestration capability: The sequential roles of ecosystem knowledge integration and ecosystem service innovation

Lee Han-Soo(Seoul National University)0009-0003-2647-2305
Sayfa
218–234
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-06
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory to the ecosystem level by explaining resilience as the outcome of coordinated capability development and offers practical insights for managers seeking to build resilient digital business ecosystems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study examines how digital business ecosystem orchestration capability enhances ecosystem resilience through sequential mediation by ecosystem knowledge integration and ecosystem service innovation, while accounting for the moderating effect of ecosystem dynamism.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data were collected via face-to-face surveys from 469 respondents between April and August 2025.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory to the ecosystem level by explaining resilience as the outcome of coordinated capability development and offers practical insights for managers seeking to build resilient digital business ecosystems.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Digital business ecosystem · Ecosystem orchestration · Ecosystem resilience

Özet

This study examines how digital business ecosystem orchestration capability enhances ecosystem resilience through sequential mediation by ecosystem knowledge integration and ecosystem service innovation, while accounting for the moderating effect of ecosystem dynamism. Data were collected via face-to-face surveys from 469 respondents between April and August 2025. Confirmatory factor analysis, bootstrapped mediation and moderated mediation analyses, and instrumental variable estimation were used to test the proposed model. The findings show that orchestration capability improves ecosystem resilience indirectly through knowledge integration and service innovation, with a significant sequential mediation effect. Moreover, ecosystem dynamism strengthens these indirect relationships. The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory to the ecosystem level by explaining resilience as the outcome of coordinated capability development and offers practical insights for managers seeking to build resilient digital business ecosystems.

Abstract

This study examines how digital business ecosystem orchestration capability enhances ecosystem resilience through sequential mediation by ecosystem knowledge integration and ecosystem service innovation, while accounting for the moderating effect of ecosystem dynamism. Data were collected via face-to-face surveys from 469 respondents between April and August 2025. Confirmatory factor analysis, bootstrapped mediation and moderated mediation analyses, and instrumental variable estimation were used to test the proposed model. The findings show that orchestration capability improves ecosystem resilience indirectly through knowledge integration and service innovation, with a significant sequential mediation effect. Moreover, ecosystem dynamism strengthens these indirect relationships. The study extends Dynamic Capabilities Theory to the ecosystem level by explaining resilience as the outcome of coordinated capability development and offers practical insights for managers seeking to build resilient digital business ecosystems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Han-Soo, L., Brestov, A. L. (2026). Building digital business ecosystem resilience through orchestration capability: The sequential roles of ecosystem knowledge integration and ecosystem service innovation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 3, 218–234. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1814388

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (51)

  1. Abbate, T., Codini, A., Aquilani, B., & Vrontis, D. (2022). From knowledge ecosystems to capabilities ecosystems: When open innovation digital platforms lead to value co-creation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(1), 290-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-021-00720-1
  2. Agarwal, R., & Selen, W. (2009). Dynamic capability building in service value networks for achieving service innovation. Decision Sciences, 40(3), 431–475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2009.00236.x
  3. Alaassar, A., Mention, A.-L., & Aas, T. H. (2022). Ecosystem dynamics: Exploring the interplay within fintech entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 58(4), 2157–2182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00505-5
  4. Bachtiar, N. K., Setiawan, A., Prastyan, G. A., & Kijkasiwat, P. (2023). Business resilience and growth strategy transformation post-crisis. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00345-5
  5. Barile, S., Grimaldi, M., Loia, F., & Sirianni, C. A. (2020). Technology, value co-creation and innovation in service ecosystems: Toward sustainable co-innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072759
  6. Baumann, S., & Leerhoff, M. (2022). Networks, platforms, and digital business ecosystems: Mapping the development of a field. In S. Baumann (Ed.), Handbook on digital business ecosystems (pp. 11–24). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Beske, P. (2012). Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(4), 372–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211231344
  8. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482.
  9. Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021). AI-enabled business-model innovation and transformation in industrial ecosystems: A framework, model and outline for further research. Journal of Business Research, 127, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016
  10. Cao, M., & Zhang, Q. (2011). Supply chain collaboration: Impact on collaborative advantage and firm performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(3), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.008
  11. Chandler, J. D., Danatzis, I., Wernicke, C., Akaka, M. A., & Reynolds, D. (2019). How does innovation emerge in a service ecosystem? Journal of Service Research, 22(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670518797479
  12. Chekfoung, T., Sunil, D., & Binita, G. (2020). Conceptualising capabilities and value co-creation in a digital business ecosystem (DBE): A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Systems Engineering & Management, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.29333/jisem/7826
  13. Chen, L., Jiang, M., Li, T., Jia, F., & Lim, M. K. (2023). Supply chain learning and performance: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(8), 1195–1225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-05-2022-0289
  14. Dai, J., Che, W., Lim, J. J., & Shou, Y. (2020). Service innovation of cold chain logistics service providers: A multiple-case study in China. Industrial Marketing Management, 89, 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.08.002
  15. Demir, M., Demir, Ş. Ş., & Yaşar, E. (2022). Big data and innovative organizational performance: Evidence from a moderated-mediated model. Creativity and Innovation Management, 31(4), 696–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12525
  16. Demir, Ş. Ş. (2026). Digital business ecosystems and operational excellence: A dynamic capabilities perspective on purchasing and supply management performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 14(4), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2026.2.003
  17. Demir, Ş. Ş., & Demir, M. (2025). Digital business ecosystems in the service industry: Innovative strategies for global perspectives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  18. Dencik, J., Marshall, A., & Parham, G. (2023). Building threat resilience into ecosystem strategy. Strategy & Leadership, 51(4), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-04-2023-0049
  19. Dey, P. K., Chowdhury, S., Abadie, A., Vann Yaroson, E., & Sarkar, S. (2023). Artificial intelligence-driven supply chain resilience in Vietnamese manufacturing small- and medium-sized enterprises. International Journal of Production Research, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2179859
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405164054.ch21
  21. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
  22. Fernández-Portillo, A., Ramos-Vecino, N., Ramos-Mariño, A., & Cachón-Rodríguez, G. (2024). How the digital business ecosystem affects stakeholder satisfaction: Its impact on business performance. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00720-2
  23. Fornasiero, R., & Tolio, T. A. (2024). Digital supply chains for ecosystem resilience: A framework for the Italian case. Operations Management Research, 18, 210–225 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-024-00511-2
  24. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  25. Gomes, L. A. D. V., Hourneaux Junior, F., Facin, A. L. F., & Leal, L. F. (2023). Performance measurement and management systems for dealing with strategies in uncertain ecosystems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(3), 543–577. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-03-2021-0209
  26. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  27. Hein, A., Weking, J., Schreieck, M., Wiesche, M., Böhm, M., & Krcmar, H. (2019). Value co-creation practices in business-to-business platform ecosystems. Electronic Markets, 29, 503–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-019-00337-y
  28. Hewett, K., Hult, G. T. M., Mantrala, M. K., Nim, N., & Pedada, K. (2022). Cross-border marketing ecosystem orchestration: A conceptualization of its determinants and boundary conditions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(2), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2021.09.003
  29. Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2255–2276. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2904
  30. Kamalaldin, A., Sjödin, D., Hullova, D., & Parida, V. (2021). Configuring ecosystem strategies for digitally enabled process innovation: A framework for equipment suppliers in the process industries. Technovation, 105, 102250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102250
  31. Kornyshova, E., Boutal, L., & Benramdane, M. K. (2023). Digital business ecosystems: Organizational model, roles, and governance towards flexibility. Procedia Computer Science, 225, 4621–4630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.460
  32. Korpela, K., Ritala, P., Vilko, J., & Hallikas, J. (2013). A management and orchestration model for integrating digital business ecosystems. International Journal of Integrated Supply Management, 8(1/2/3), 24–51. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISM.2013.055066
  33. Lettner, N., Wilhelm, S., Güldenberg, S., & Güttel, W. (2022). Customers as knowledge partners in a digital business ecosystem: From customer analytics towards knowledge partnerships. Journal of Digital Economy, 1(2), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdec.2022.08.001
  34. Lustenberger, M., Malešević, S., & Spychiger, F. (2021). Ecosystem readiness: Blockchain adoption is driven externally. Frontiers in Blockchain, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbloc.2021.720454
  35. Lütjen, H., Schultz, C., Tietze, F., & Urmetzer, F. (2019). Managing ecosystems for service innovation: A dynamic capability view. Journal of Business Research, 506–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.001
  36. Ma, Y., Rong, K., Mangalagiu, D., Thornton, T. F., & Zhu, D. (2018). Co-evolution between urban sustainability and business ecosystem innovation: Evidence from the sharing mobility sector in Shanghai. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 942–953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323
  37. Möller, K., Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020). Networks, ecosystems, fields, market systems? Making sense of the business environment. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 380–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.013
  38. Novani, S., Cyntiawati, C., Kijima, K., Trianto, A. S., Mayangsari, L., Alamanda, D. T., & Anggadwita, G. (2023). Empowering digital creative ecosystem using problem structuring method and a service science perspective: A case study in Cimahi and Bandung, Indonesia. Asia Pacific Management Review, 28(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2022.09.003
  39. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  40. Porschen-Hueck, S., Sauer, S. (2021). From Agile Teams and Organizations to Agile Business Ecosystems? Contradiction Management as a Requirement of Agile Scaling and Transformation Processes. In: Pfeiffer, S., Nicklich, M., Sauer, S. (eds) The Agile Imperative. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73994-2_5
  41. Poyton, D. (2023). The role of regulation in facilitating new business models driven by digital platforms: Creating regulatory ecosystems. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 37(3), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2022.2136934
  42. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  43. Priyono, A., & Hidayat, A. (2024). Fostering innovation through learning from digital business ecosystem: A dynamic capability perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100196
  44. Reuter, E., & Floyd, S. (2024). Strategic leaders' ecosystem vision formation and digital transformation: A motivated interactional lens. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 18(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1493
  45. Rong, K., & Luo, Y. (2023). Toward born sharing: The sharing economy evolution enabled by the digital ecosystems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122776
  46. Secundo, G., Spilotro, C., Gast, J., & Corvello, V. (2024). The transformative power of artificial intelligence within innovation ecosystems: A review and a conceptual framework. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00828-z
  47. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266
  48. Tsai, C., Zdravkovic, J., & Stirna, J. (2022). Modeling digital business ecosystems: A systematic literature review. Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly, 30, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2022-30.01
  49. Visscher, K., Hahn, K., & Konrad, K. (2021). Innovation ecosystem strategies of industrial firms: A multilayered approach to alignment and strategic positioning. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(3), 619–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12429
  50. Yaşar, E., Demir, M., & Cobanoglu, C. (2025). Big data analytic capabilities, intrapreneurship, and service innovation behaviors: A moderated mediation model. The Service Industries Journal, 45(9–10), 819–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2024.2364816
  51. Zheng, A. (2026). Understanding digital business ecosystems in gastronomy: The mediating role of digital collaboration and the moderating effect of environmental turbulence. Journal of Tourism Theory and Research, 12(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.24288/jttr.1814295