Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Efficacy of the Cervical Vertebral Maturation Method: A Systematic Review

Sayfa
55–66
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Overall, the CVM method can be considered an effective method and may be used with other skeletal indices for the radiographic assessment of skeletal maturity, and also to identify the growth peak in growing patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The present systematic review was carried out to evaluate both qualitatively and quantitatively the effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method in predicting the pubertal growth spurt.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The research included every article published from 1970 to June 2019, featuring the keywords: (“cervical vertebrae” OR (“cervical” AND “vertebrae”) AND (“orthodontics” OR “growth and development” OR (“growth” AND “development”) OR (“growth”).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Overall, the CVM method can be considered an effective method and may be used with other skeletal indices for the radiographic assessment of skeletal maturity, and also to identify the growth peak in growing patients.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The present systematic review was carried out to evaluate both qualitatively and quantitatively the effectiveness of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method in predicting the pubertal growth spurt. Methods: PubMed, PMC, Scopus, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science databases were searched. The research included every article published from 1970 to June 2019, featuring the keywords: (“cervical vertebrae” OR (“cervical” AND “vertebrae”) AND (“orthodontics” OR “growth and development” OR (“growth” AND “development”) OR (“growth”). The Preferred Reporting Items for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) protocol was adopted, and quality assessments modified from the “Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology” (STROBE) and the “Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies” (STARD) were performed to conduct this systematic review. Results: Initially, 1284 articles were found. All the articles were then examined, and 43 studies met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen articles had low-quality scores, 25 had moderate scores, and 2 had high scores. The results showed a moderate to high statistically significant correlation between the CVM and other maturation methods. Conclusion: Overall, the CVM method can be considered an effective method and may be used with other skeletal indices for the radiographic assessment of skeletal maturity, and also to identify the growth peak in growing patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LUCCHESE, A., BONDEMARK, L., FARRONATO, M., RUBINI, G., GHERLONE, E. F., GIUDICE, A. L., MANUELLI, M. (2022). Efficacy of the Cervical Vertebral Maturation Method: A Systematic Review. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 55–66. https://ajindex.com/articles/414292

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Lamparski DG. Skeletal age assessment utilizing cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod. 1975;67(4):458-459. [CrossRef] 2. Hassel B, Farman AG. Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(1):58-66. [CrossRef] 3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72(4):316-323. [CrossRef] 4. Santiago RC, de Miranda Costa LF, Vitral RW et al. Cervical vertebral maturation as a biologic indicator of skeletal maturity. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(6):1123-1131. [CrossRef] 5. Beit P, Peltomäki T, Schätzle M, Signorelli L, Patcas R. Evaluating the agreement of skeletal age assessment based on hand-wrist and cervical vertebrae radiography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(6):838-847. [CrossRef] 6. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLOS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. [CrossRef] 7. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349. [CrossRef] 8. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Clin Chem. 2003;49(1):7-18. [CrossRef] 9. Mito T, Sato K, Mitani H. Cervical vertebral bone age in girls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002;122(4):380-385. [CrossRef] 10. Wong RW, Alkhal HA, Rabie AB. Use of cervical vertebral maturation to determine skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(4):484.e1-6; discussion 484. [CrossRef] 11. San Román P, Palma JC, Oteo MD, Nevado E. Skeletal maturation determined by cervical vertebrae development. Eur J Orthod. 2002;24(3):303-311. [CrossRef] 12. Caldas Mde P, Ambrosano GM, Haiter Neto F. Computer-assisted analysis of cervical vertebral bone age using cephalometric radiographs in Brazilian subjects. Braz Oral Res. 2010;24(1):120-126. [CrossRef] 13. Soegiharto BM, Moles DR, Cunningham SJ. Discriminatory ability of the skeletal maturation index and the cervical vertebrae maturation index in detecting peak pubertal growth in Indonesian and white subjects with receiver operating characteristics analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(2):227-237. [CrossRef] 14. Gandini P,Mancini M, Andreani F. A c