Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Orthodontics / 2022 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

The Effects of Increased Maxillary Canine Bracket Angulation on Tooth Movement and Alignment Efficiency: A Prospective Clinical Study

Sayfa
33–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: A +10° Mx3 bracket angulation increased the inclination of Mx3 to the mesial, but it decreased the Mx3 distal linear movement and the retraction of Mx1, with no difference in terms of alignment efficiency between the+10° and 0° Mx3 bracket angulations

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 10° angulation of a maxillary canine (Mx3) bracket on Mx3 and maxillary central incisor (Mx1) tooth movements and alignment efficiency in treatments involving maxillary premolar extraction.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This split-mouth study included 29 individuals in a +10° angulation study group and a 0° angulation control group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: A +10° Mx3 bracket angulation increased the inclination of Mx3 to the mesial, but it decreased the Mx3 distal linear movement and the retraction of Mx1, with no difference in terms of alignment efficiency between the+10° and 0° Mx3 bracket angulations
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a 10° angulation of a maxillary canine (Mx3) bracket on Mx3 and maxillary central incisor (Mx1) tooth movements and alignment efficiency in treatments involving maxillary premolar extraction. Methods: This split-mouth study included 29 individuals in a +10° angulation study group and a 0° angulation control group. The initial (T0) and 12th week (T1) orthodontic models were prepared and digitized with a three-dimensional scanner and superimposed using the OrthoAnalyzer analysis program. The movements of Mx3 and Mx1 were measured, and the alignment efficiency was assessed using Little’s Irregularity Index. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to test the data for a normal distribution. T1 and T0 measurements within the group and T1 and T0 differences between groups were compared using a paired samples t-test. The significance level was set to P 0.05). Conclusion: A +10° Mx3 bracket angulation increased the inclination of Mx3 to the mesial, but it decreased the Mx3 distal linear movement and the retraction of Mx1, with no difference in terms of alignment efficiency between the+10° and 0° Mx3 bracket angulations

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TÜREDİ, M., YAZICIOĞLU, S. (2022). The Effects of Increased Maxillary Canine Bracket Angulation on Tooth Movement and Alignment Efficiency: A Prospective Clinical Study. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 33–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/414290

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Thickett E, Taylor NG, Hodge T. Choosing a pre-adjusted orthodontic appliance prescription for anterior teeth. J Orthod. 2007
  2. 34(2):95- 100. [CrossRef] 2. Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972
  3. 62(3):296-309. [CrossRef] 3. Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT. Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008
  4. 134(4):470.e1-470.e8. [CrossRef] 4. Roth RH. The straight wire appliance 17 years later. J Clin Orthod. 1987
  5. 21(9):632-642. 5. Proffit WR, Fields HJ, Sarver DM, eds. Contemporary Orthodontics. Elsevier Mosby
  6. McLaughlin R, Bennett J, Trevisi H. Systemized orthodontic treatment mechanics. First Published. St Louis: Mosby International
  7. Capelozza Filho L, Silva Filho O, Ozawaka T, Cavassan A. Brackets individualization in straight-wire technique: concepts review and suggestions for prescribed use. Rev Dent Press Ortod Ortop Facial. 1999
  8. 4(4):78-106. 8. McLaughlin R, Bennett J, Trevisi H. A clinical review of the MBT orthodontic treatment program. Orthod Perspec. 1997
  9. 4(2):3-15. 9. Rajesh M, Kishore M, Shetty KS. Comparison of anchorage loss following initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription–A clinical prospective study. J Int Oral Health JIOH. 2014
  10. 6(2):16. 10. Castro IO, Gribel BF, Gonçalves de Alencar AH, Valladares-Neto J, Estrela C. Evaluation of crown inclination and angulation after orthodontic treatment using digitalmodels. J Orofac Orthop. 2018
  11. Pontes LF, Cecim RL, Machado SM, Normando D. Tooth angulation and dental arch perimeter—the effect of orthodontic bracket prescription. Eur J Orthod. 2015
  12. 37(4):435-439. [CrossRef] 12. Huffman DJ, Way DC. A clinical evaluation of tooth movement along arch wires of two different sizes. Am J Orthod. 1983
  13. 83(6): 453-459. 13. Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989
  14. 95(2):99-106. [CrossRef] 14. Daskalogiannakis J, McLachlan KR. Canine retraction with rare earth magnets: an investigation into the validity of the constant force hypothesis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996
  15. 109(5):489-495. [CrossRef] 15. Ormco Product Catalog. 800.854.1741 | 714.516.7400 | ormco.com. 2017:97. 16. Jyothikiran H, Shantharaj R, Batra P, et al. Total recall: an update on orthodontic wires. Int J Orthod Milwaukee. 20