Dergiler / Türk İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 27

NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALAN-GHO’A IN AKBAR-NAME

Ekber-Name’de Alan-go’a Efsanesinin Yeniden Yorumlanması

Sayfa
165–182
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this article, how and why the narrative of Alan-gho‘a was reshaped in the Akbar‘s court is examined through a comparison with theChinggisid and Timurid traditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Alan-gho‘a was the legendary ancestress of the Chinggis Khan‘s Golden Lineage(Altan Urug) that retained the privilege of ruling in Central Asia throughcenturies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Akbar Shah, third ruler of Baburid (Mughal) Empire in India, claimedAlan-gho‘a being as his ancestress.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this article, how and why the narrative of Alan-gho‘a was reshaped in the Akbar‘s court is examined through a comparison with theChinggisid and Timurid traditions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Alan-gho‘a was the legendary ancestress of the Chinggis Khan‘s Golden Lineage(Altan Urug) that retained the privilege of ruling in Central Asia throughcenturies. Akbar Shah, third ruler of Baburid (Mughal) Empire in India, claimedAlan-gho‘a being as his ancestress. This did not depend upon his blood kinshipwith the Chinggisids; instead, it was claimed that the main reason for theexistence of Alan-gho‘a was Akbar‘s divine entrance into the world; the reignsof Chinggisids and others were transitory until Akbar was born. Akbar Shahconstructed his ―splendid charisma‖ on this claim through a re-interpretation ofthe narrative of Alan-gho‘a in a sufi mystical way making his subject people whopossessed divergent religious and cultural values believe in his power andauthority and uniting them around his dynasty. In this way, Akbar Shah alsoplaced his Timurid ancestors and his lineage in a position that was superior tothe Chinggisids and all the other dynasties in the World. Alan-gho‘a‘s newinterpretation was made according to the new cultural values and socialstructure of his Empire which consisted of almost the whole Indiansubcontinent. In this article, how and why the narrative of Alan-gho‘a was reshaped in the Akbar‘s court is examined through a comparison with theChinggisid and Timurid traditions.

Abstract

Alan-go‘a, yüzyıllar boyunca Orta Asya‘da hükümdar olma ayrıcalığını elinde tutan Cengiz Han‘ın Altın Soyunun (Altan Uruğ) efsanevi ata anasıdır. Hindistan‘da kurulan Babür İmparatorluğunun üçüncü hükümdarı olan Ekber İah da Alan-goa‘nın kendi atası olduğunu ileri sürdü. Bu iddiayı, kendisinin Cengizliler ile olan Akrabalık bağına dayanarak ortaya koymadı. Aksine, Alango‘a‘nın var oluş nedeninin kendisinin ilahi bir varlık olarak Dünya‘ya gelmesi olduğunu ve Cengizlilerin ve diğerlerinin hükmünün kendisi Dünya‘ya gelinceye kadar bittiğini ileri sürdü; bu amaçla Alan-go‘a hikâyesini sufi mistik bir açıdan İmparatorluğu içinde bulunan farklı dini-kültürel değerlere göre yeniden yorumlattı. Böylece, kendisine gösterişli bir karizma oluşturarak, hakimiyeti altında bulunan farklı dini-kültürel ve etnik özellikler gösteren topluluklara gücünün ve otoritesinin meşruluğunu kabul ettirmeyi amaçladı. Ayrıca, Ekber İah Alan-go‘a efsanesi üzerinden, atası olarak gördüğü Timurileri ve kendi soyundan gelenleri, Cengizlilerden ve Dünya‘nın bütün hanedanlıklarından üstün olduğu iddiasında bulundu. İşte bu makalede, Alango‘a efsanesi Cengizli ve Timurlu gelenek ile karşılaştırılarak, bu efsanesinin Ekber Şah sarayında niçin ve nasıl yeniden şekillendirildiği sorularına cevap aranacaktır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DALKESEN, N. (2019). NEW INTERPRETATION OF ALAN-GHO’A IN AKBAR-NAME. Türk İslam Medeniyeti Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 27, 165–182. https://ajindex.com/articles/413994

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. ABU‘L FAZL ALLAMI, 2000 (1907), The Akbar Nama of Abu-l-Fazl, translated: H. Beveridge, Low Price Publications, New Delhi. ALAM, M., 2004, The Language of Political Islam; India 1200-1800, Hurst&Company, London. ANOOSHAHR, A., 2012, ―Dialogism and Territoriality in a Mughal History of the Islamic Millennium,‖ Journal of Social and Economic History of Orient, volume:55, Number:2/3, p.220-254.
  2. BALABANLILAR, L., 2016, Memory and Dynastic Politics in Early Modern South and Central Asia; Imperial Identity in the Mughal Empire, I. B. Tauris. BEVERIDGE, H., 1912 (1986), A Comprehensive History of India, volume:I With an introduction of J.P. Gulo, Associated Publishing House New Delhi-110005. DALKESEN, N., 2012, ‖The Cult of Alan-gho‘a and Unique Position of Women in the Chinggisid Dynasties‖, Proceedings of Hsiung-nu Empire and the Study of Ancient Mongolian History Conference, Mongolian Academy of Science, Ulanbaatar, p.388-398.
  3. FLEISCHER, C., 1986, Bureaucrat and Intellectual in the Ottoman Empire; The Historian Mustafa Âli (1541-1600),
  4. Princeton University Press.
  5. FOLTZ, R., 1997, ―Central Asians in the Administration of Mughal India,‖ Journal of Asian History, Volume:31, number: 2, p.139-154.
  6. FOLTZ, R., 1998, ―Cultural Contacts between Central Asia and Mughal India‖, Central Asiatic Journal, volume:42, number:1, p. 44-65.
  7. HUSAIN, A., 1971, ―Marriages among Mughal Nobles as an Index of Status and Aristocratic Integration‖, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress, volume:33,p.304-312.
  8. JORDENS, J. T. F., 1999, (Third. Ed.), ―Medieval Hindu Devotionalism‖, A Cultural History of India, edited: A. L. Basham, Oxford Univ. Press, p. 266- 280. DICKSON, M., 1958,
  9. Shah Tahmasb and the Ozbeks, Published Phd. Dissertation Thesis, Princeton University. KHAN, I.A., 2001, ―State in the Mughal India: Re-examination of the Myths of a Countervision‖, Social Scientist, volume:. 30, number:1-2, January-February, p.16-37.
  10. HODGSON, M., 1974,
  11. Venture of Islam, Conscience and History in a World Civilization; The Gunpowder Empires and Modern Times, volume: 3, University of Chicago press, Chicago & London. KAFALI, M., ―Timur,‖ in İA (MEB), volume: 12/1, s.336. KHANDMIR, 1342/1963-64, Giyas el-Din, Ḥabib al-Siyar fi Akhbar-i Afrad-i Bashar, Vol.3, edited: Jalāl al-Din Huma‘i and Muhammad Dabir-Siyaqi, Intisharat-I Khayyam, Tehran. KOLF, D. H. A., 1998, ―A Warlord‘s Fresh Attempt at Empire,‖ in the Mughal State 1526-1750, edited: Muzaffar Alam and Sanjay Subrahmanyam, Oxford Univ. Pres