Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Pediatrics / 2020 / Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2

Performance of SNAPPE-II score in neonatal sepsis: an experience from a tertiary care center

Sayfa
191–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Prediction of outcome by SNAPPE-II score is not affected by positive or negative blood culture sepsis.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background and objectives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted with the hypothesis that the performance of the SNAPPE-II score might be affected by the presence of sepsis in newborns admitted with possible early onset septicemia and whether score performance varies between culture positive and culture negative sepsis.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Prediction of outcome by SNAPPE-II score is not affected by positive or negative blood culture sepsis.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background and objectives. The Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology II with Perinatal Extension (SNAPPE-II) is a vital tool for prognostication in newborns. The study was conducted with the hypothesis that the performance of the SNAPPE-II score might be affected by the presence of sepsis in newborns admitted with possible early onset septicemia and whether score performance varies between culture positive and culture negative sepsis. Methods. The prospective observational study was conducted over a period of 1 year (January 2014 to January 2015) in neonates presenting with clinical suspicion of sepsis to the Sick Newborn Care Unit (SNCU) of a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India. Results. SNAPPE-II score cut-off of ≥20 offered the highest sensitivity of 74.5% with specificity 48.3%, PPV 27.6% and NPV 87.7%. Comparison of mortality proportions between the two subgroups defined by this cut-off returned p= 0.005 with OR 3.47 (95% 1.40 to 8.64). No significant association was found between SNAPPE-II score and blood culture results; mean scores for culture positive (25.16 ± 15.6) and negative groups (24.49 ± 15.6) were comparable (p= 0.920). Conclusions. At a cut-off value of ≥20 in presence of sepsis, SNAPPE-II score offers acceptable indices to predict mortality outcome. Prediction of outcome by SNAPPE-II score is not affected by positive or negative blood culture sepsis.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAMANTA, M., BISWAS, C., PAL, N. K., SARKAR, S., GOSWAMİ, A., HAZRA, A., BHOWMİK, A., SABUI, T. K. (2020). Performance of SNAPPE-II score in neonatal sepsis: an experience from a tertiary care center. Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, Cilt: 62 - Sayı: 2, 191–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/411870

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Puopolo KM. Bacterial and fungal infections. In: Cloherty JP, Eichenwald EC, Stark AR (eds). Manual of Neonatal Care (6th ed). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2008: 274-300
  2. Sharma M, Yadav A, Yadav S, Goel N, Chaudhary U. Microbial profile of septicemia in children. Indian J Pract Doct 2008; 5: 5-8
  3. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Lateonset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002; 110(2 Pt 1): 285-291
  4. Bang AT, Bang RA, Baitule SB, Reddy MH, Deshmukh MD. Effect of home-based neonatal care and management of sepsis on neonatal mortality: field trial in rural India. Lancet 1999; 354: 1955-1961
  5. Darmstadt GL, Saha SK, Choi Y, et al; and the Bangladesh Projahnmo-2 (Mirzapur) Study Group. Population-based incidence and etiology of community-acquired neonatal bacteremia in Mirzapur, Bangladesh: an observational study. J Infect Dis 2009; 200: 906-915
  6. Shirazi H, Riaz S, Tahir R. Role of the hematological profile in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci 2010; 6: 152-156
  7. Richardson DK, Gray JE, McCormick MC, Workman K, Goldman DA. Score for neonatal acute physiology: a physiology severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 617-623
  8. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ,Lee M SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: Simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr 2001; 138: 92-100
  9. Harsha SS, Archana BR. SNAPPE- II (Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology with Perinatal Extension-II) in predicting mortality and morbidity in NICU. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: SC10-SC12
  10. Gebrehiwot A, Lakew W, Moges F, et al. Predictors of positive blood culture and death among neonates with suspected neonatal sepsis in Gondar University Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Euro J Exp Bio 2012; 2: 2212-2218
  11. RA M, Etika R, Harianto A, Indarso F, Damanik SM. The use of score for neonatal acute physiology perinatal extention II (SNAPPE II) in predicting neonatal outcome in neonatal intensive care unit. Paediatr Indones 2005; 45: 241-245
  12. Thimoty J, Hilmanto D, Yuniati T. Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology Perinatal Extension II (SNAPPE II) as the predictor of neonatal mortality hospitalized in neonatal intensive care unit. Paediatr Indones 2009; 49: 155-159
  13. Ramirez MNM, Godoy LE, Barrientos EA. SNAP II and SNAPPE II as Predictors of Neonatal Mortality in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: Does Postnatal Age Play a