Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Rectal indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Sayfa
236–240
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Rectal indomethacin can reduce the overall incidence and the severity of PEP.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: This meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of rectal indomethacin in the preven- tion of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Major databases including Embase, Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Pubmed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify all relevant studies from January 1960 to July 2013.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Rectal indomethacin can reduce the overall incidence and the severity of PEP.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:2013 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: This meta-analysis was undertaken to evaluate the effect of rectal indomethacin in the preven- tion of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis. Materials and Methods: Major databases including Embase, Medline, Science Citation Index Expanded, Pubmed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify all relevant studies from January 1960 to July 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing prophylactic use of rectal indomethacin versus placebo were included. Risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using fixed- or random- effect models. Results: Three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analyses. The overall incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) was significantly decreased by prophylactic rectal indomethacin compared with the placebo (RR=0.51; 95% CI=0.37-0.70). The pooled incidence of moderate to severe pancreatitis was also decreased by rectal indomethacin prophylaxis (RR=0.43; 95% CI=0.23-0.80). Conclusion: Rectal indomethacin can reduce the overall incidence and the severity of PEP.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SHİ, N., DENG, L., ALTAF, K., HUANG, W., WUE, P., XİA, Q. (2015). Rectal indomethacin for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 236–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/409384

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (2)

  1. Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a com- prehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 845-64. [CrossRef] 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Freeman ML, DiSario JA, Nelson DB, et al. Risk factors for post- ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-34. [CrossRef] Freeman ML. Pancreatic stents for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis. Clin Gastro- enterol Hepatol 2007; 5: 1354-65. [CrossRef] Lankisch PG, Koop H, Winckler K, Kunze H, Vogt W. Indomethacin treatment of acute experimental pancreatitis in the rat. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978; 13: 629-33. [CrossRef] Wildenhain PM, Melhem MF, Birsic WI, Sell HW, Rao KN. Acute hemorrhagic pancreatitis in mice: improved survival after indo- methacin administration. Digestion 1989; 44: 41-51. [CrossRef] Coelle EF, Adham N, Elashoff J, Lewin K, Taylor IL. Effects of prosta- glandin and indomethacin on diet-induced acute pancreatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 1983; 85: 1307-12. van Ooijen B, Ouwendijk RJ, Kort WJ, et al. Raised plasma throm- boxane B2 levels in experimental acute necrotizing pancreatitis in rats. The effects of flunarizine, dazoxiben, and indomethacin. Scand J Gastroenterol 1988; 23: 188-92. [CrossRef] Robert A, Lum JT, Lancaster C, Olafsson AS, Kolbasa KP, Nezamis JE. Prevention by prostaglandins of caerulein-induced pancreati- tis in rats. Lab Invest 1989; 60: 677-91.
  2. Arata S, Takada T, Hirata K, et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Hepato- biliary Pancreat Sci 2010; 17: 70-8. [CrossRef] Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-93. [CrossRef] Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of re- ports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996; 17: 1-12. [CrossRef] Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring incon- sistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-60. [CrossRef] DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-88. [CrossRef] Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1414-22. [CrossRef] 15. Monta-o Loza A, Rodríguez Lomelí X, García Correa JE, et al. Effect of the administration of rectal indomethacin on amylase serum levels after endoscopic retrograde