KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3

Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale: Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study

İpek ŞENKAL ERTÜRK
AYŞEGÜL DURAK BATIGÜN
Sayfa
[255]–267
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: This Turkish version of the ADA can be considered a valid and reliable scale to be used in studies related to attachment in adult romantic relationships.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: The aim of the current study was to adapt the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale (ADA) to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Method: The study was conducted with 2 separate sample groups of married individuals.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: This Turkish version of the ADA can be considered a valid and reliable scale to be used in studies related to attachment in adult romantic relationships.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: The aim of the current study was to adapt the Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale (ADA) to Turkish and to examine its psychometric properties. Method: The study was conducted with 2 separate sample groups of married individuals. The first sample group, which was used to perform exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), consisted of 285 individuals (66% female, 33.7% male) aged 20-45 years (32.41±5.40 years). The second sample group, for which only CFA was performed, comprised 585 individuals (50.4% female, 49.2% male) aged 21-50 years (34.33±6.23 years). The Paulson Daily Living Inventory and the Experiences in Close Relationships measures were used as convergent validity criteria, and the Borderline Personality Inventory was used as a discriminant validity criterion. Results: The EFA resulted in a single-factor structure to evaluate disorganized attachment in adult romantic relationships. The model fit indices obtained as a result of CFA were within the acceptable limits in both sample groups. The other validity and reliability values determined were also found to be sufficient. Conclusion: This Turkish version of the ADA can be considered a valid and reliable scale to be used in studies related to attachment in adult romantic relationships.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ERTÜRK, İ. Ş., BATIGÜN, A. D. (2021). Adult Disorganized Attachment Scale: Turkish adaptation, validity, and reliability study. Düşünen Adam - Psikiyatri ve Nörolojik Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 3, [255]–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/408923

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Kaynak Malatyalı M, Buyuksahin Sunal A. The mediating role of marital power in the relationship between attachment dimensions and marital satisfaction in married couples. Turkish Journal of Psychology 2020; 35:65-78. [Turkish] 2. Read DL, Clark GI, Rock AJ, Coventry WL. Adult attachment and social anxiety: The mediating role of emotion regulation strategies. PloS One 2018; 13:e0207514
  2. Salman Engin S, Sumer N, Sagel Cetiner E, Sakman E. The association between parents' co-parenting behaviors and perceptions, and romantic attachment. Ankara University Journal of the Faculty of Languages, History and Geography 2019; 59:717-741. [Turkish] 4. Bartholomew K. Avoidance of intimacy: An attachment perspective. J Soc Pers Relat 1990; 7:147-178
  3. Bowlby J. Attachment and Loss: Vol
  4. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books, 1973
  5. Bowlby J. A Secure Base: Clinical Applications of Attachment Theory. London: Routledge, 1988
  6. Hazan C, Shaver PR. Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J Pers Soc Psychol 1987; 52:511-524
  7. Hazan C, Shaver PR. Love and work: An attachment-theoretical perspective. J Pers Soc Psychol 1990; 59:270-280
  8. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. J Pers Soc Psychol 1991; 61:226-244
  9. Paetzold RL, Rholes WS, Kohn JL. Disorganized attachment in adulthood: Theory, measurement, and implications for romantic relationships. Rev Gen Psychol 2015; 19:146-156
  10. Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1978
  11. Main M, Solomon J. Procedures for Identifying Infants as Disorganized/Disoriented during the Ainsworth Strange Situation. In Greenberg MT, Cicchetti D, Cummings EM (editors). Attachment in the Preschool Years: Theory, Research, and Intervention. Chicago, US: University of Chicago Press, 1990, 121-159
  12. Rholes WS, Paetzold RL, Kohn JL. Disorganized attachment mediates the link from early trauma to externalizing behavior in adult relationships. Pers Individ Dif 2016; 90:61-65
  13. Khoury JE, Zona K, Bertha E, Choi-Kain L, Hennighausen K, Lyons-Ruth K. Disorganized attachment interactions among young adults with borderline personality disorder, other diagnoses, and no diagnosis. J Pers Disord 2020; 34:764-784
  14. Fonagy P, Gergely G, Jurist EL, Target M. Affect Regulation, Mentalization and the Development of the Self. New York: Other Pres