Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 10

Palliative resection of primary site in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors improves survivals

Sayfa
910–916
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Age (p=0.131), gender (p=0.051), chromogranin A level (p=0.104), Ki-67 index (p=0.550), tumor size (p=0.623), and primarytumor area (p=0.154) did not influence the overall survival.Conclusion: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected had improved survivals when compared to theunresected group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/Aims: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rarely seen and have heterogeneous clinical outcomes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Resection of metastases was excluded.Results: Fifty-three patients were included in the study and 29 patients had primary tumor resection.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Age (p=0.131), gender (p=0.051), chromogranin A level (p=0.104), Ki-67 index (p=0.550), tumor size (p=0.623), and primarytumor area (p=0.154) did not influence the overall survival.Conclusion: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected had improved survivals when compared to theunresected group.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background/Aims: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are rarely seen and have heterogeneous clinical outcomes. Mostlyhalf of the patients had metastatic disease at presentation. Palliative resection of primary site in metastatic disease is still controversial.The aim of this study was to find out the influence of resection of primary tumor site on progression-free survival and overall survival inmetastatic non-functioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. The secondary end point is to determine the prognosticfactors influencing the survivals.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted at a single medical oncology center, Antalya Education and Research Hospital. Patients who had non-functioning metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected or unresectedwere compared retrospectively. Resection of metastases was excluded.Results: Fifty-three patients were included in the study and 29 patients had primary tumor resection. The primary site resected grouphad favorable outcomes with the overall survival (median unreached) compared to the median overall survival of 30 months in the unresected group (p=0.001). Median progression-free survival was also better in the primary site resected group than the unresected group(60 months vs. 14 months, respectively) (p=0.013). In multivariate analysis, unresected primary site and high-grade tumors were foundto be independent prognostic factors on low survivals (Hazard ratio (HR): 4.6; 95% CI: 1.21-17.47 and HR: 10.1; 95% CI: 1.15-88.84, respectively). Age (p=0.131), gender (p=0.051), chromogranin A level (p=0.104), Ki-67 index (p=0.550), tumor size (p=0.623), and primarytumor area (p=0.154) did not influence the overall survival.Conclusion: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with primary site resected had improved survivals when compared to theunresected group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SALİM, D. K., BAYRAM, S., GÖMCELİ, İ., ÇEKİN, A. H., KARACA, M., KOÇER, M., YILDIZ, M. (2019). Palliative resection of primary site in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors improves survivals. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 10, 910–916. https://ajindex.com/articles/408785

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Lewis A, Raoof M, Ituarte PHG, et al. Resection of the Primary Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Improves Survival with or without Liver Treatment. Ann Surg 2018 May 9. doi: 10.1097/ SLA.0000000000002809. [Epub ahead of print] [CrossRef] 2. Chan DL, Dixon M, Law CHL, et al. Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery for Metastatic Low-Grade Neuroendocrine Tumors in the Setting of Extrahepatic Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2018
  2. [CrossRef] 3. Falconi M, Eriksson B, Kaltsas G, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for the Management of Patients with Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Non-Functional Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Neuroendocrinology 2016
  3. [CrossRef] 4. Birnbaum DJ, Turrini O, Vigano L, et al. Surgical management of advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: short-term and longterm results from an international multi-institutional study. Ann Surg Oncol 2015
  4. [CrossRef] 5. Howe JR, Cardona K, Fraker DL, et al. The Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Consensus Guidelines of the North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Pancreas 2017
  5. [CrossRef] 6. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Kunz PL, Reidy-Lagunes D, Anthony LB, et al. North American Neuroendocrine Tumor Society. Consensus guidelines for the management and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Pancreas 2013
  7. [CrossRef] 8. Bertani E, Fazio N, Botteri E, et al. Resection of the primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor in patients with unresectable liver metastases: possible indications for a multimodal approach. Surgery 2014
  8. [CrossRef] 9. Keutgen XM, Nilubol N, Glanville J, et al. Resection of primary tumor site is associated with prolonged survival in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery 2016
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Nguyen SQ, Angel LP, Divino CM, Schluender S, Warner RR. Surgery in malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. J Surg Oncol 2007
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Hüttner FJ, Schneider L, Tarantino I et al. Palliative resection of the primary tumor in 442 metastasized neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a population-based, propensity score-matched survival analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2015
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Strosberg J, Gardner N, Kvols L.