Dergiler / The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology / 2022 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study

Sayfa
298–304
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: The result of this study showed us that the rate of same-side cranial embo- lism detected on cranial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting performed with open-cell stent was higher than those of the carotid artery stenting procedure performed with closed-cell and hybrid-cell stents.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Silent cranial embolism due to carotid artery stenting has been demon- strated to cause dementia, cognitive decline, and even ischemic stroke.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The purpose of this study was to compare the periprocedural asymptomatic cranial embolism rates of different stent designs used for extracranial carotid stenosis with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: The result of this study showed us that the rate of same-side cranial embo- lism detected on cranial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting performed with open-cell stent was higher than those of the carotid artery stenting procedure performed with closed-cell and hybrid-cell stents.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2010 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: Silent cranial embolism due to carotid artery stenting has been demon- strated to cause dementia, cognitive decline, and even ischemic stroke. The purpose of this study was to compare the periprocedural asymptomatic cranial embolism rates of different stent designs used for extracranial carotid stenosis with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Methods: A total of 507 consecutive patients who underwent carotid artery stenting at our center from December 2010 to June 2020 (mean age, 66.4 ± 9.5) were analyzed ret- rospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups as open-cell stent (334 patients), closed-cell stent (102 patients), and hybrid-cell stent (71 patients) groups. Diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging was performed for the patients before and after carotid artery stenting and compared. The diffusion limitations of 3 stent groups on cra- nial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging were compared with one another. Results: Periprocedural asymptomatic same-side microembolism, which was the primary endpoint of our study, was detected in 58 (17.4%) patients in the open-cell stent group, 6 (5.9%) patients in the closed-cell group, and 8 (11.3%) patients in the hybrid cell group, and overall in 72 (14.2%) patients. On diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, periprocedural asymptomatic same-side cranial embolism was found to be statistically significantly higher in the open-cell group compared to the other two groups (P = .011). Conclusions: The result of this study showed us that the rate of same-side cranial embo- lism detected on cranial diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after carotid artery stenting performed with open-cell stent was higher than those of the carotid artery stenting procedure performed with closed-cell and hybrid-cell stents.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KÖKLÜ, E., ARSLAN, Ş., GENCER, E. S., BAYAR, N., ÜREYEN, Ç. M., ERKAL, Z., GENÇ, A., GÜVEN, R., KAYA, O. K., ERSOYSAL, M. R. (2022). Asymptomatic Cerebral Emboli Following Carotid Artery Stenting: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI Study. The Anatolian Journal of Cardiology, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 298–304. https://ajindex.com/articles/407436

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Brott TG, Hobson RW, Howard G, et al. Stenting versus endar- terectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2010
  2. 363(1):11-23. [CrossRef] 2. Schnaudigel S, Gröschel K, Pilgram SM, Kastrup A. New brain lesions after carotid stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2008
  3. 39(6):1911- 1919. [CrossRef] 3. Macdonald S, Evans DH, Griffiths PD, et al. Filter-protected versus unprotected carotid artery stenting: a randomised trial. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2010
  4. 29(3):282-289. [CrossRef] 4. Kastrup A, Gröschel K, Krapf H, Brehm BR, Dichgans J, Schulz JB. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. Stroke. 2003
  5. 34(3):813-819. [CrossRef] 5. Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Varnakov Y, Tuebler T, Schofer J. Risk fac- tors for cerebral embolization after carotid artery stenting with embolic protection: a diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging study in 837 consecutive patients. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2013
  6. 6(3):311-316. [CrossRef] 6. Jaeger HJ, Mathias KD, Hauth E, et al. Cerebral ischemia detected with diffusion-weighted MR imaging after stent implantation in the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002
  7. 23(2):200-207. 7. Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, et al. Editor's choice - manage- ment of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 clinical practice guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018
  8. 55(1):3- 81. [CrossRef] 8. Stabile E, Giugliano G, Cremonesi A, et al. Impact on outcome of different types of carotid stent: results from the European Registry of Carotid artery stenting. EuroIntervention. 2016
  9. 12(2):e265-e270. [CrossRef] 9. International Carotid Stenting Study investigators, Ederle J, Dob- son J, et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterec- tomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised con- trolled trial. Lancet. 2010
  10. 375(9719):985-997. [CrossRe 10. Arslan S, Köklü E, Yüksel IÖ, et al. Two-year results of carotid artery stenting. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2014
  11. 42(5):429-434. [CrossRef] 11. Garami ZF, Bismuth J, Charlton-Ouw KM, Davies MG, Peden EK, Lumsden AB. Feasibility of simultaneous pre- and postfilter transcranial Doppler monitoring during carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg. 2009
  12. 49(2):340-344, 345.e1-345.e2. [CrossRef] 12. Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Ha