Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Lumbar Disc Surgery with Epidural Anesthesia: Review of 700 Cases

Sayfa
399–403
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CONCLUSION: This study showed that epidural anesthesia seems more advantageous for some patients since it does not have some of the risks that general anesthesia bears

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: Lumbar disc surgery can be performed under general anesthesia or regional anesthesia methods.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results of this study’s 700 lumbar disc surgery cases operated with epidural anesthesia in our clinic between September 2006 and December 2011 will contribute to these discussions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CONCLUSION: This study showed that epidural anesthesia seems more advantageous for some patients since it does not have some of the risks that general anesthesia bears
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2006 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: Lumbar disc surgery can be performed under general anesthesia or regional anesthesia methods. There are long-standing discussions between neurosurgeons, orthopedic surgeons and anesthesiologists concerning the use of epidural anesthesia in lumbar surgery. The results of this study’s 700 lumbar disc surgery cases operated with epidural anesthesia in our clinic between September 2006 and December 2011 will contribute to these discussions. MATERIAL and METHODS: This study included 700 patients underwent lumbar disc surgery with epidural anesthesia, which consisted of 388 males (55%) and 312 females (45%). Forty-two of these cases had recurrence disc herniation and only 11 of 42 cases were operated in our department. RESULTS: Eleven of 700 cases had dural injury and were repaired intraoperatively by primary sutures and tissue sealants. Infection of the incision site developed in six patients, who healed with appropriate antibiotic treatment with no problems. In addition to those 700 cases, 22 patients received general anesthesia in which we started with epidural anesthesia. Microdiscectomies were performed in 578 of 700 cases, and open surgery in 122 cases. CONCLUSION: This study showed that epidural anesthesia seems more advantageous for some patients since it does not have some of the risks that general anesthesia bears

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALBAYRAK, S., EROL, F. S., DEMİREL, İ., AYDEN, O., ÜÇLER, N. (2016). Lumbar Disc Surgery with Epidural Anesthesia: Review of 700 Cases. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 399–403. https://ajindex.com/articles/404688

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Beattie WS, Badner NH, Choi P: Epidural analgesia reduces postoperative myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 93: 853-858, 2001 2. Bonica JC: The management of pain. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febriger, 1990: 1883 3. Bromage PR: Epidural analgesia. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1978: 746 4. Chandrasekhar S, Peterfreund RA: Horner’s syndrome following very low concentration bupivacaine infusion for labor epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth 15: 217-219, 2003 5. Dahlgren N, Törnebrandt K: Neurological complications after anesthesia. A follow-up of 18,000 spinal and epidural anesthetics performed over three years. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 39: 872-880, 1995 6. Demirel CB, Kalayci M, Ozkocak I, Altunkaya H, Ozer Y, Acikgoz B: A prospective randomized study comparing perioperative outcome variables after epidural or general anesthesia for lumbar disc surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 15: 185-192, 2003 7. Goffin J: Microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 96: 130-134, 1994 8. Grant IS: Intercurrent disease and anesthesia. In: Aitkenhead AR, Smith G (eds), Textbook of Anesthesia, 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1990: 645-676 9. Greenbarg PE, Brown MD, Pallares VS, Tompkins JS, Mann NH: Epidural anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery. J Spinal Disord 1:139-143, 1988 10. Jellish WS, Thalji Z, Stevenson K, Shea J: A prospective randomized study comparing short- and intermediate-term perioperative outcome variables after spinal or general anesthesia for lumbar disc and laminectomy surgery. Anesth Analg 83: 559-564, 1996 11. Kehlet H: Modification of responses to surgery by neural blockade: Clinical implications. In: Cousins MJ, Bridenbaugh PO (eds), Neural blockade in Clinical Aneasthesia and Management of Pain, 2nd ed, Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1988: 145-188 12. Kindler C, Seeberger M, Siegemund M, Schneider M: Extradural abscess complicating lumbar extradural anesthesia and analgesia in an obstetric patient. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 40: 858-861, 1996 13. Levine WC: Clinical Anesthesia Procedures of the Massachusetts General Hospital. 3rd ed. 1988: 207 14. Modig J, Borg T, Karlström G, Maripuu E, Sahlstedt B: Thromboembolism after total hip replacement: Role of epidural and general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 62:174-180, 1983 15. Riegel B, Aliebert F, Becq MC, Duckert I, Krivosic-Horber R: Lumbar disc herniation with surgical option: General versus local anesthesia (round table). Agressologie 34: 33-37, 1994 16. Roberts MP: