Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2016 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

The Correlation Study of C5 Nerve Root Palsy and Common Body Position in Posterior Total Laminectomy Decompression and Instrumentation

Sayfa
280–285
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The patients in the traction bed group had a higher nerve root palsy rate and change in cervical alignment because of over traction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To compare both the clinical characteristics and incidence of postoperative cervical nerve root palsy in cervical spondylosis patients treated by posterior total laminectomy, decompression and instrumentation with two different common body positions, traction bed and plaster bed.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:MATERIAl and METhODS: One hundred and thirty-three patients, with a mean age of 49.5 years suffering from multilevel cervical spondylosis and treated by laminectomy from 2007 to 2009, were reviewed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The patients in the traction bed group had a higher nerve root palsy rate and change in cervical alignment because of over traction.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To compare both the clinical characteristics and incidence of postoperative cervical nerve root palsy in cervical spondylosis patients treated by posterior total laminectomy, decompression and instrumentation with two different common body positions, traction bed and plaster bed. MATERIAl and METhODS: One hundred and thirty-three patients, with a mean age of 49.5 years suffering from multilevel cervical spondylosis and treated by laminectomy from 2007 to 2009, were reviewed. RESUlTS: Overall 30 of 133 (22.56%) patients had C5 palsy, of which 14 (19.44%) out of 72 patients were in the plaster bed group, while 16 of 61 (26.23%) patients were in the traction bed group. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). CONClUSION: The cervical curvature index (CCI) reflected both the change of cervical height and the change of the overall cervical curvature. CCI was related with the incidence of C5 nerve root palsy postoperatively. The patients in the traction bed group had a higher nerve root palsy rate and change in cervical alignment because of over traction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LIU, T., KONG, J., ZOU, W., SUN, Z., YAN, W., XIAO, J. (2016). The Correlation Study of C5 Nerve Root Palsy and Common Body Position in Posterior Total Laminectomy Decompression and Instrumentation. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 280–285. https://ajindex.com/articles/404623

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M, Taneichi H, Kotani Y, Kaneda K: Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 25: 962-969, 2000 2. Boakye M, Patil CG, Ho C, Lad SP: Cervical corpectomy: Complications and outcomes. Neurosurgery 63: 295-301, 2008 3. Chen Y, Chen D, Wang X, Guo Y, He Z: C5 palsy after laminectomy and posterior cervical fixation for ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(7):533-535, 2007 4. Chiba K, Toyama Y, Matsumoto M, Maruiwa H, Watanabe M, Hirabayashi K: Segmental motor paralysis after expansive opendoor laminectomy. Spine 27:2108- 2115, 2002 5. Epstein JA: Extradural tethering effects as one mechanism of radiculopathy complicating posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. Spine 21(15):1839- 1840, 1996 6. Hasegawa K, Homma T, Chiba Y: Upper extremity palsy following cervical decompression surgery results from a transient spinal cord lesion. Spine 32(6): E197- 202, 2007 7. Kalisvaart MM, Nassr A, Eck JC: C5 palsy after cervical decompression procedures. Neurosurg Q 19(4):276-282, 2009 8. Komagata M, Nishiyama M, Endo K, Ikegami H, Tanaka S, Imakiire A: Prophylaxis of C5 palsy after cervical expansive laminectomy by bilateral partial foraminotomy. Spine J 4(6):650-655, 2004 9. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Fujii R, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H: Segmental motor paralysis after cervical laminoplasty: A prospective study. Spine 31(23): 2684-2688, 2006 10. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H: C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: Review of the literature. Spine 28(21):2447-2451, 2003 11. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K: Long-term follow-up studies of open- door expansive laminectomy for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine 19(5): 507-510, 1994 12. Sasai K, Saito T, Akagi S, Kato I, Ohnari H, Iida H: Preventing C5 palsy after laminectomy. Spine 28: 1972-1977, 2003 13. Takemitsu M,Cheung KM, Wong YW, Cheung WY, Luk KD: C5 nerve root palsy after cervical laminoplasty and posterior fusion with instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(4): 267-272, 2008 14. Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Wakabayashi K: Postoperative cervical radiculopathy after laminoplasty. Bessatsu Seikeigeka 29:195- 199, 1996 (in Japanese) 15. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Okai K: Paralysis of the arm after posterior decompression of the cervical spinal cord. II; Analyses of clinical findings. Eur Spine J 2(4):197-202, 1993 16. Tsuzuki N, Abe R, Saiki K, Zhon