Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

Biomechanical Changes in Disc Pressure and Facet Strain after Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charité(TM) in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload

Sayfa
252–258
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

COnCLuSIOn: In an ex-vivo physiologic preload setting, the SB Charité(TM) III provided relatively inconsistent and sometimes increased DP or FS at the operative and adjacent levels after arthroplasty.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: Arthroplasty maintains the biomechanical features of a healthy disc, decreases the adjacent segment disease rate, and decreases the accelerated degeneration rate of the neighboring discs in traditional fusion procedures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:DP was measured by inserting pressure transducer needle tips into the L3-L4 and L5-S1 discs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:COnCLuSIOn: In an ex-vivo physiologic preload setting, the SB Charité(TM) III provided relatively inconsistent and sometimes increased DP or FS at the operative and adjacent levels after arthroplasty.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: Arthroplasty maintains the biomechanical features of a healthy disc, decreases the adjacent segment disease rate, and decreases the accelerated degeneration rate of the neighboring discs in traditional fusion procedures. However, there are only a few reports on adjacent disc pressure (DP) and facet strain (FS) after lumbar arthroplasty under a physiologic compressive preload. MATERIAL and METhODS: Baseline DP and FS measurements were obtained from five intact cadaveric human lumbosacral spines for different modes of motion. DP was measured by inserting pressure transducer needle tips into the L3-L4 and L5-S1 discs. FS gauges were fixed on both sides of the laminae near the L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1 facet joints. After SB Charité(TM) III implantation at the L4-L5 level, the measurements were repeated at preload and compared with those of the intact spine. RESuLTS: Under the preload condition, the central DP of the upper disc was decreased during extension and bending, and it significantly increased during rotation (p < 0.05). In the lower disc, the central DP insignificantly decreased during bending and increased during extension and flexion. A statistically significant increase in FS was observed during rotation at the operative facet (p < 0.05). Compared to the intact spine, all FS values were insignificantly decreased during lateral bending but increased during axial rotation. COnCLuSIOn: In an ex-vivo physiologic preload setting, the SB Charité(TM) III provided relatively inconsistent and sometimes increased DP or FS at the operative and adjacent levels after arthroplasty.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CHOI, J., KIM, S., LIM, D., HA, S., KIM, S. (2017). Biomechanical Changes in Disc Pressure and Facet Strain after Lumbar Spinal Arthroplasty with Charité(TM) in the Human Cadaveric Spine under Physiologic Compressive Follower Preload. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 252–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/404586

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Chow DH, Luk KD, Evans JH, Leong JC: Effects of short anterior lumbar interbody fusion on biomechanics of neighboring unfused segments. Spine 21: 549-555, 1996 2. Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Yamamoto I, Oxland TR: Euler stability of the human ligamentous spine. Part II: Experiment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 7: 27-32, 1992 3. Cunningham BW, Gordon JD, Dmitriev AE, Hu N, McAfee PC: Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: An in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine 28: S110-S117, 2003 4. Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, Cappuccino A, McAfee PC: The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: An in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 22: 2655-2663, 1997 5. Dekutoski MB, Schendel MJ, Ogilvie JW, Olsewski JM, Wallace LJ, Lewis JL: Comparison of in vivo and in vitro adjacent segment motion after lumbar fusion. Spine 19:1745- 1751, 1994 6. Dickman CA, Yahiro MA, Lu HT, Melkerson MN: Surgical treatment alternatives for fixation of unstable fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine: A meta-analysis. Spine 19: S2266-S2273, 1994 7. Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B: Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 1: 143-154, 2004 8. Gertzbein SD, Seligman J, Holtby R, Chan KW, Oqston N, Kapasouri A, Tile M: Centrode characteristics of the lumbar spine as a function of segmental instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208: 48-51, 1986 9. Goel VK, Grauer JN, Patel TC, Biyani A, Sairyo K, Vishnubhotla S, Matyas A, Cowgill I, Shaw M, Long R, Dick D, Panjabi MM, Serhan H: Effects of charite artificial disc on the implanted and adjacent spinal segments mechanics using a hybrid testing protocol. Spine 30: 2755-2764, 2005 10. Goel VK, Weinstein JN, Patwardhan AG: Biomechanics of intact ligamentous spine. In: Goel VK, Weinstein JN (eds). Biomechanics of the Spine: Clinical and Surgical Perspectives. FL, CRC Press, 1990: 97-156 11. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH: Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am