KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

Accuracy of Frozen-Section Diagnosis of Brain Tumors: An 11-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center

Fatima Nouri OBEIDAT
Heyam Adnan AWAD
Ahmad Talal MANSOUR
Manar Hussein HAJEER
Mohammad Asem AL JALABI
Loay Emad ABUDALU
Sayfa
242–246
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, more emphasis on diagnostic cytology inintraoperative consultation is required as an effective adjunct to frozen section to overcome limitations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To analyze the frozen section (FS) diagnostic accuracy in correlation with the final diagnosis of brain tumors.MATERIAL and METHODS: This retrospective study comprised all brain tumor cases with FS diagnosis and permanent sectiondiagnosis in Jordan University Hospital from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) software v20 was used for analysis.RESULTS: A total of 179 cases with frozen section and permanent section diagnoses were analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, more emphasis on diagnostic cytology inintraoperative consultation is required as an effective adjunct to frozen section to overcome limitations.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To analyze the frozen section (FS) diagnostic accuracy in correlation with the final diagnosis of brain tumors.MATERIAL and METHODS: This retrospective study comprised all brain tumor cases with FS diagnosis and permanent sectiondiagnosis in Jordan University Hospital from July 1, 2007 to December 31, 2017. Data were obtained by reviewing slides and reportsfrom the histopathology archives. Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) software v20 was used for analysis.RESULTS: A total of 179 cases with frozen section and permanent section diagnoses were analyzed. Eighty-four (47%) patientswere males and 95 (53%) females.The ages ranged from 1 to 85 years. Diagnostic accuracy of FS was 88.8%. Discrepancy wasnoted in 20 cases. Of the discrepancies, misclassification of tumor type was the most common category (12 cases, 60%), followedby grading mismatch (7 cases, 35%) and misdiagnosis of tumor versus non-tumor conditions (1 case, 5%). Patient age and genderwere not significantly associated with the discrepancy between FS and final diagnosis.CONCLUSION: Our results were comparable to international reports. However, more emphasis on diagnostic cytology inintraoperative consultation is required as an effective adjunct to frozen section to overcome limitations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OBEIDAT, F. N., AWAD, H. A., MANSOUR, A. T., HAJEER, M. H., JALABI, M. A. A., ABUDALU, L. E. (2019). Accuracy of Frozen-Section Diagnosis of Brain Tumors: An 11-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 242–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/404417

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Abbasi F, Yekta Z, Aryan A: Accuracy of frozen sections. Iran J Pathol 7:3-8, 2012 2. Al-Ajmi R, Al-Kindi H, George M, Thomas K: Correlation of intraoperative frozen section report and histopathological diagnosis of central nervous system tumors–a six-year retrospective study. Oman Med J 31:414, 2016‏ 3. Bosman F, Jaffe E, Lakhani S, Ohgaki H: WHO classification of tumors of central nervous system. Lyon: IARC, 2013:10-12 4. Burger PC: Use of cytological preparations in the frozen section diagnosis of central nervous system neoplasia. Am J Surg Pathol 9:344–354, 1985 5. Burger PC, Vogel SF: Frozen section interpretation in surgical neuropathology, I: Intracranial lesions. Am J Surg Pathol 1: 323–347, 1977 6. Chand P, Amit S, Gupta R, Agarwal A: Errors, limitations, and pitfalls in the diagnosis of central and peripheral nervous system lesions in intraoperative cytology and frozen sections. J Cytol 33:93, 2016 7. Chandramouleeswari K, Yogambal M, Arunalatha P, Bose JC, Rajendran A: Frozen and paraffin sections-comparative study highlighting the concordance and discordance rates in a tertiary care centre. IOSR-JDMS 12:26-30, 2013 8. Chang JL, Tseng HH, Sheu LF, Lee WH, Tu YC: Diagnostic accuracy of frozen sections in surgical pathology-a retrospective analysis of 1084 frozen sections. J Med Sci 13:133-142, 1992 9. Cheunsuchon P, Punyashthira A, Tanboon J, Sangruchi T: Accuracy of intraoperative consultation of central nervous system lesions in Siriraj hospital. SMJ 66:113-119, 2017 10. Di Stefano D, Scucchi LF, Cosentino L, Bosman C, Vecchione A: Intraoperative diagnosis of nervous system lesions. Acta Cytol 42:346–356, 1998 11. Farah-Klibi F, Neji O, Ferjaoui M, Zaouche A, Koubaa A, Sfar R, et al: Accuracy of frozen section diagnosis: An analysis of 1695 consecutive cases. Tunis Med 86:693-697, 2008 12. Firlik KS, Martinez AJ, Lunsford LD: Use of cytological preparations for the intraoperative diagnosis of stereotactically obtained brain biopsies: A 19-year experience and survey of neuropathologists. J Neurosurg 91:454–458, 1999 13. Howanitz PJ, Hoffman GG, Zarbo RJ: The accuracy of frozensection diagnoses in 34 hospitals. Arch Pathol Lab Med 114: 355-359, 1990 14. Jaafar H: Intra-operative frozen section consultation: Concepts, applications and limitations. Malays J Med Sci 13: 4, 2006‏ 15. Khoddami M, Akbarzadeh A, Mordai A, Bidari-Zerehpoush F, Alipour H, Samadzadeh S, Alipour B: Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section of central nervous system lesions: