Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

The Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring on Extent of Resection and Long-Term Neurological Outcomes: A Series of 39 Intramedullary Ependimomas

Sayfa
252–262
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Therefore, no correlation was demonstrated between the decrease inthe basal amplitudes of IONM and D-waves and poor neurological outcomes.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To analyze the impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on the extent of removal and long-termneurological outcomes in a series of grade II ependymomas.MATERIAL and METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of anintramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) at the Clinic of Neurosurgery of the Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade between January2012 and December 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In all, 39 patients (25 males and 14 females; mean age 46.16 years) with grade II ependymomas wereenrolled in this study; the mean follow-up time was 49.84 months.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Therefore, no correlation was demonstrated between the decrease inthe basal amplitudes of IONM and D-waves and poor neurological outcomes.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To analyze the impact of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on the extent of removal and long-termneurological outcomes in a series of grade II ependymomas.MATERIAL and METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 88 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection of anintramedullary spinal cord tumor (IMSCT) at the Clinic of Neurosurgery of the Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade between January2012 and December 2017. In all, 39 patients (25 males and 14 females; mean age 46.16 years) with grade II ependymomas wereenrolled in this study; the mean follow-up time was 49.84 months. The modified McCormick Scale (mMCS) was used to assess theshort- and long-term outcomes, and the patients were divided into two groups based on whether they underwent IONM.RESULTS: The gross-total removal rate was 89.7%, and it was not influenced by use of IONM, location or tumor size. Uponadmission,43.2% of the patients were dependent (grades IV and V), while 56.8% were independent (grades I, II and III), according tothe mMCS. After 3 months of follow-up, 76.9% of the patients maintained or improved their neurological status, but this percentagewas reduced after long-term follow-up.CONCLUSION: Total surgical resection with good neurological outcomes can be achieved in the vast majority of patients with gradeII ependymomas; it is important to emphasize that the use of IONM allows acceptable extent of resection and provides better resultsin terms of functional outcomes, with lower morbidity rates. Therefore, no correlation was demonstrated between the decrease inthe basal amplitudes of IONM and D-waves and poor neurological outcomes.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MILICEVIC, M., SOLARI, D., ILLIC, R., FRIO, F., STANIMIROVIC, A., SAVIC, D., SOMMA, T., CAVALLO, L. M., GRUJICIC, D. (2020). The Impact of Intraoperative Monitoring on Extent of Resection and Long-Term Neurological Outcomes: A Series of 39 Intramedullary Ependimomas. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 252–262. https://ajindex.com/articles/404331

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Abdullah KG, Lubelski D, Miller J, Steinmetz MP, Shin JH, Krishnaney A, Mroz TE, Benzel EC: Progression free survival and functional outcome after surgical resection of intramedullary ependymomas. J Clin Neurosci 22:1933-1937, 2015 2. Aghakhani N, David P, Parker F, Lacroix C, Benoudiba F, Tadie M: Intramedullary spinal ependymomas: Analysis of a consecutive series of 82 adult cases with particular attention to patients with no preoperative neurological deficit. Neurosurgery 62:1279-1285
  2. discussion 1285-1286, 2008 3. Borges LF: Spinal intramedullary ependymoma: Surgical approaches and outcome. J Neurosurg Sci 62:51-62, 2018 4. Boström A, von Lehe M, Hartmann W, Pietsch T, Feuss M, Boström JP, Schramm J, Simon M: Surgery for spinal cord ependymomas: Outcome and prognostic factors. Neurosurgery 68:302-308
  3. discussion 309, 2011 5. Chamberlain MC, Tredway TL: Adult primary intradural spinal cord tumors: A review. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11:320-328, 2011 6. Chang UK, Choe WJ, Chung SK, Chung CK, Kim HJ: Surgical outcome and prognostic factors of spinal intramedullary ependymomas in adults. J Neurooncol 57:133-139, 2002 7. Choi I, Hyun SJ, Kang JK, Rhim SC: Combined muscle motor and somatosensory evoked potentials for intramedullary spinal cord tumour surgery. Yonsei Med J 55:1063-1071, 2014 8. Fehlings MG, Brodke DS, Norvell DC, Dettori JR: The evidence for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: Does it make a difference? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:S37-46, 2010 9. Garcés-Ambrossi GL, McGirt MJ, Mehta VA, Sciubba DM, Witham TF, Bydon A, Wolinksy JP, Jallo GI, Gokaslan ZL: Factors associated with progression-free survival and longterm neurological outcome after resection of intramedullary spinal cord tumors: Analysis of 101 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg Spine 11:591-599, 2009 10. Godfraind C: Classification and controversies in pathology of ependymomas. Childs Nerv Syst 25:1185-1193, 2009 11. Guan S, Shen R, Lafortune T, Tiao N, Houghton P, Yung WK, Koul D: Establishment and characterization of clinically relevant models of ependymoma: A true challenge for targeted therapy. Neuro Oncol 13:748-758, 2011 12. Hadley MN1, Shank CD1, Rozzelle CJ1, Walters BC1. Guidelines for the Use of Electrophysiological Monitoring for Surgery of the Human Spinal Column and Spinal Cord. Neurosurgery. 2017 Nov 1
  4. 81(5):713-732. 13. Harrop JS, Ganju A, Groff M, Bilsky M: Primary intramedullary tumors of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:S69-77, 2009