Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Thalamus Volume on Magnetic Resonance and Cadaveric Section Images

Sayfa
491–500
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Our findings support the reliability of DBS procedures using MRI and stereotactic method.KEYWORDS: Cadaver, Deep brain stimulation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Planimetry technique, Thalamus

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To measure and to compare the volume of thalamus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the anatomical sections.MATERIAL and METHODS: In this study, 13 brain specimens were used.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:First, the images were taken in 3 mm sections on MRI,the thickness of the thalamus was measured.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Our findings support the reliability of DBS procedures using MRI and stereotactic method.KEYWORDS: Cadaver, Deep brain stimulation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Planimetry technique, Thalamus
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To measure and to compare the volume of thalamus using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the anatomical sections.MATERIAL and METHODS: In this study, 13 brain specimens were used. First, the images were taken in 3 mm sections on MRI,the thickness of the thalamus was measured. Subsequently, 4 mm coronal sections were prepared using a microtome. The thalamicvolumes calculated from cadaveric specimens were compared with the measurements obtained using MRI.RESULTS: On MRI, the mean thalamic volumes on the right and left hemispheres were found to be 5843.4 ± 361.6 mm3 and 5377.0± 666.2 mm3 respectively. The mean volumes of the cadaveric sections were 5610.8 ± 401.3 mm3 on the right side and 5618.5 ±604.1 mm3 on the left hemisphere. No statistically significant difference was found between the volume calculated from MRI andthat obtained from the cadaveric section (p<0.05).CONCLUSION: This study shows a correlation between measurement of thalamus volume based on MRI and those calculated fromanatomical sections. Our findings support the reliability of DBS procedures using MRI and stereotactic method.KEYWORDS: Cadaver, Deep brain stimulation, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Planimetry technique, Thalamus

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAYACI, S., BAŞ, O., ÇELİKER, F. B., UCUNCU, Y., ARSLAN, Y. K., ÖZVEREN, M. F., AKYOL, Ş. (2020). Comparison of Thalamus Volume on Magnetic Resonance and Cadaveric Section Images. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 491–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/404284

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Acer N, Sahin B, Bas O, Ertekin T, Usanmaz M: Comparison of three methods for the estimation of total intracranial volume: Stereologic, planimetric, and anthropometric approaches. Ann Plast Surg 58:48–53, 2007 2. Afifi Adel K, Bergman Ronald A. Functional neuroanatomy: Text and Atlas, 2nd ed. 2005:156 3. Andrade DM, Zumsteg D, Hamani C, Hodaie M, Sarkissian S, Lozano AM, Wennberg RA: Long-term follow-up of patients with thalamic deep brain stimulation for epilepsy. Neurology 66:1571–1573, 2006 4. Auer T, Schwarcz A, Horváth RA, Barsi P, Janszky J: Functional magnetic resonance imaging in neurology. Ideggyogy Sz 30: 16-23, 2008 5. Bas O, Acer N, Mas N, Karabekir HS, Kusbeci OY, Sahin B: Stereological evaluation of the volume and volume fraction of intracranial structures in magnetic resonance images of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Anat 191:186-195, 2008 6. Bernasconi F, Andermann DL, Arnold Bernasconi A: Entorhinal cortex MRI assessment in temporal, extratemporal, and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Epilepsia 44:1070-1074, 2003 7. Betting LE, Mory SB, Lopes-Cendes I, Li LM, Guerreiro MM, Guerreiro CA, Cendes F: MRI volumetry shows increased anterior thalamic volumes in patients with absence seizures. Epilepsy Behav 8:575-580, 2006 8. Byne W, Buchsbaum MS, Mattiace LA, Hazlett EA, Kemether E, Elhakem SL, Purohit DP Haroutunian V, Jones L: Postmortem assessment of thalamic nuclear volumes in subjects with schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 159:59-65, 2002 9. Calmon G, Roberts N: Automatic measurement of changes in brain volume on consecutive 3D MR images by segmentation propagation. Magn Reson Imaging 18:439-453, 2000 10. Chapman PH, Buchbinder BR, Cosgrove GR, Jiang HJ: Functional magnetic resonance imaging for cortical mapping in pediatric neurosurgery. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:122-126, 1995 11. Chung MS, Kim SY: Three-dimensional image and virtual dissection program of the brain made of Korean cadaver. Yonsei Med J 41:299-303, 2000 12. Csernansky JG, Schindler MK, Splinter NR, Wang L, Gado M, Selemon LD, Rastogi-Cruz D, Posener JA, Thompson PA, Miller MI: Abnormalities of thalamic volume and shape in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry 161:896-902, 2004 13. Dormont D, Seidenwurm D, Galanaud D, Cornu P, Yelnik J, Bardinet E: Neuroimaging and deep brain stimulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:15-23, 2010 14. Gundersen HJ, Jensen EB: The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction. J Microsc 147: 229- 263, 1987 15. Guridi J,Rodriguez-Oro