Dergiler / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 6

Medical Malpractice in Turkey: Pediatric Cases Resulting in Death

Sayfa
631–637
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: In conclusion, it is considered to be important for the pediatricians to maintain proper communication with the relatives of the patients while monitoring their health condition, and pediatricians are expected to be more careful—especially in the diagnostic phase—in the cases involving 0-1 age group as children are most likely to be diagnosed as healthy in this age group.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Malpractice in medicine refers to the failure of a physician to meet a standard of diagnosis and treatment, damages/injuries caused by reprehensible ignorance, or negligence of a doctor.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Allegedly malpractice cases of pediatricians and the cases in which causal link between malpractice and death was confirmed by the decision of the First Board of Specialization of the Council of Forensic Medicine between the dates of Januray 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: In conclusion, it is considered to be important for the pediatricians to maintain proper communication with the relatives of the patients while monitoring their health condition, and pediatricians are expected to be more careful—especially in the diagnostic phase—in the cases involving 0-1 age group as children are most likely to be diagnosed as healthy in this age group.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2012 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Background: Malpractice in medicine refers to the failure of a physician to meet a standard of diagnosis and treatment, damages/injuries caused by reprehensible ignorance, or negligence of a doctor. Methods: Allegedly malpractice cases of pediatricians and the cases in which causal link between malpractice and death was confirmed by the decision of the First Board of Specialization of the Council of Forensic Medicine between the dates of Januray 1, 2012 and December 31, 2014 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The study revealed that in the majority of 286 cases, the infants were 0-28 days old (n = 115; 40.2%) and were hospitalized due to respiratory problems (n = 111; 38.8%). The allegations of malpractice cases were most frequently seen in private hospitals (n = 120; 42%). Malpractice was found in 17.5% of the cases (n = 50), in which the majority of cased were proved to be diagnostic errors (n = 24; 48%). The most common diagnostic error was the misdiagnosis of “healthy child” in medical malpractice cases (n = 11, 22%). Conclusions: In conclusion, it is considered to be important for the pediatricians to maintain proper communication with the relatives of the patients while monitoring their health condition, and pediatricians are expected to be more careful—especially in the diagnostic phase—in the cases involving 0-1 age group as children are most likely to be diagnosed as healthy in this age group.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HOSUKLER, E., ÜZÜN, İ., MELEZ, İ. E., HÖSÜKLER, B., ELEVLİ, M. (2021). Medical Malpractice in Turkey: Pediatric Cases Resulting in Death. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 56 - Sayı: 6, 631–637. https://ajindex.com/articles/403404

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Statistics 2015. 2015. Available at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/1702 50/1/9789240694439_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
  2. Traina F. Medical malpractice: the experience in Italy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):434-442. [CrossRef] 3. Buzzacchi L, Scellato G, Ughetto E. Frequency of medical malpractice claims: the effects of volumes and specialties. Soc Sci Med. 2016;170:152-160. [CrossRef] 4. Koç S. Forensic medicine related physician liability and malpractice. Toraks Cer Bult. 2014;5(1):14-22. [CrossRef] 5. Koç S. Responsibility and obligations of physician by legal regulations. Turkderm. 2007;41:33-38
  3. Altun G, Yorulmaz AC. Physician responsibility and medical malpractice after the legal regulations. Trak Univ Tip Fak Derg. 2010;27:7-12. Available at: https://balkanmedicaljournal.org/Co ntent/files/sayilar/159/pdf_BMJ_993.pdf
  4. Gülsen R. Criminal liability of physicians regarding from malpractice. J Med Law. 2012;1:43-67
  5. Hakeri H. Distinction between malpractice and complication in medical law. Toraks Cer Bult. 2014;5(1):23-28. [CrossRef] 9. Ersoy LV. Medical malpactice. Bull Thorac Surg. 2014;5:29-32. [CrossRef] 10. Wu CY, Lai HJ, Chen RC. Medical malpractice experience of Taiwan: 2005 versus 1991. Intern Med J. 2009;39(4):237-242. [CrossRef]
  6. Jena AB, Chandra A, Seabury SA. Malpractice risk among US pediatricians. Pediatrics. 2013;131(6):1148-1154. [CrossRef] 12. Sarıca N, Ertan A, İçmeli S, Birgen N, Ovalp F. Evaluation of pediatric malpractice litigation cases from medico-legal point of view. J Med Sci. 2009;29:884-889. Available at: https://www.turkiyek linikleri.com/article/tr-cocuk-sagligi-ve-hastaliklari-uzmanlik-a laninda-tibbi-uygulama-hatasi-iddiasi-bulunan-olgularin-adli -tip-acisindan-degerlendirilmesi-55584.html
  7. Leflar RB. The regulation of medical malpractice in Japan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(2):443-449. [CrossRef] 14. Çoban İ. Adli tıp Kurumu’nca görüş Bildirilen Nöroloji ve Nöroşirüriji Dalinda Tıbbi Uygulama Hatası [Thesis in Turkish]. Ankara: Adli Tıp Kurumu; 2013
  8. Madea B, Preuss J. Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies. Forensic Sci Int. 2009;190(1- 3):58-66. [CrossRef] 16. Li H, Wu X, Sun T, et al. Claims, liabilities, injures and compensation payments of medical malpractice litigation cases in China from 1998 to 2011. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:390. [CrossRef] 17. Casali MB, Mobilia F, Sordo SD Del, Blandin