Dergiler / Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management in Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Turkey: A Prospective Survey

Sayfa
216–221
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The present survey revealed that current mechanical ventila- tion and non-ventilation treatment strategies in pediatric ARDS in Turkey are relatively uniform and largely consistent with international practices

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: This study aimed to explore the compliance of management strategies for pediat- ric acute respiratory distress syndrome in pediatric intensive care units in Turkey with current guidelines.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We delivered the survey, consisting of questions on topics in the relevant literature on acute respiratory distress syndrome management in children (1 month–18 years), to the heads/staff of the 100 units via email or phone.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The present survey revealed that current mechanical ventila- tion and non-ventilation treatment strategies in pediatric ARDS in Turkey are relatively uniform and largely consistent with international practices
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: This study aimed to explore the compliance of management strategies for pediat- ric acute respiratory distress syndrome in pediatric intensive care units in Turkey with current guidelines. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional, prospective survey study. We delivered the survey, consisting of questions on topics in the relevant literature on acute respiratory distress syndrome management in children (1 month–18 years), to the heads/staff of the 100 units via email or phone. Results: In total, 51 (51%) out of 100 targeted pediatric intensive care units responded to the sur- vey. We found out that 17 (33%) units comply with no acute respiratory distress syndrome guide- line, while 65% frequently utilize cuffed endotracheal tubes. The majority of the units (86%) achieve their mechanical ventilation targets with the help of pressure control modes. Besides, steroid and surfactant use are present in 47% and 45% of the units, respectively, while 16% and 38% of the units use inhaled nitric oxide and high-frequency oscillatory ventilation, respectively. Conclusion: Lung-protective ventilation strategies preventing ventilator-associated lung injury are explicit in all responding units. The present survey revealed that current mechanical ventila- tion and non-ventilation treatment strategies in pediatric ARDS in Turkey are relatively uniform and largely consistent with international practices

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, R., TÜRKYILMAZ, E., KARATAŞ, Ö. Ü., SAMANCI, H. K. (2022). Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Management in Pediatric Intensive Care Units in Turkey: A Prospective Survey. Turkish archives of pediatrics (Online), Cilt: 57 - Sayı: 2, 216–221. https://ajindex.com/articles/418318

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Santschi M, Randolph AG, Rimensberger PC, et al. Mechanical ventilation strategies in children with acute lung injury: a survey on stated practice pattern*. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(7):e332-e337. [CrossRef] 2. Amato MBP, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, et al. Effect of a protective- ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(6):347-354. [CrossRef] 3. Khemani RG, Conti D, Alonzo TA, Bart RD, Newth CJ. Effect of tidal volume in children with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Inten- sive Care Med. 2009;35(8):1428-1437. [CrossRef] 4. Albuali WH, Singh RN, Fraser DD, et al. Have changes in ventilation practice improved outcome in children with acute lung injury? Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(4):324-330. [CrossRef] 5. Ålander M, Peltoniemi O, Saarela T, Anttila E, Pokka T, Kontiokari T. Current trends in paediatric and neonatal ventilatory care–a nationwide survey. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102(2):123-128. [CrossRef] 6. Jensen LL, Baratt-Due A, Englund PN, Harju JA, Sigurðsson TS, Liberg JP. Paediatric ventilation treatment of acute lung injury in Nordic intensive care units. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2015;59(5):568-575. [CrossRef] 7. Thomas NJ, Jouvet P, Willson D. Acute lung injury in children—kids really aren’t just “little adults”. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14(4):429- 432. [CrossRef] 8. Khemani RG, Smith L, Lopez-Fernandez YM, et al. Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome incidence and epidemiology (PAR- DIE): an international, observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(2):115-128. [CrossRef] 9. Parvathaneni K, Belani S, Leung D, Newth CJ, Khemani RG. Evalu- ating the performance of the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017;18(1):17-25. [CrossRef] 10. Erickson S, Schibler A, Numa A, et al. Acute lung injury in pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand—A prospective, mul- ticenter, observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2007;8(4):317- 323. [CrossRef] 11. Khemani RG, Newth CJ. The design of future pediatric mechanical ventilation trials for acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(12):1465-1474. [CrossRef] 12. Curley MA, Arnold JH, Thompson JE, et al. Clinical trial design— effect of prone positioning on clinical outcomes in infants and children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Crit Care. 2006;21(1):23-32; discussion 32. [CrossRef] 13. Pediatric Acute Lung Injury