Dergiler / Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters / 2021 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4

Predictability of concrete damage level by non-destructive test methods

Sayfa
138–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that the resonant frequency method is more successful than other methods in estimating the amount of damage in concrete.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Non-destructive methods have many advantages over traditional test methods, especially since it does not damage the specimen, it can be used multiple times on the same specimen.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Firstly, concretes containing different binders were produced, and along with the mechanical properties, ultrasonic wave velocity, resonance frequency, and electrical resistivity values of the produced concrete were determined at the 7, 28, and 90 days.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that the resonant frequency method is more successful than other methods in estimating the amount of damage in concrete.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Non-destructive methods have many advantages over traditional test methods, especially since it does not damage the specimen, it can be used multiple times on the same specimen. These advantages also provide a great benefit in terms of following the property development in concrete as the same specimens are used which eliminates the variations related to the specimens. In this study, it is aimed to determine the damage amount of concrete produced with different binders by electrical bulk resistivity, resonance frequency, and ultrasonic pulse velocity methods. Firstly, concretes containing different binders were produced, and along with the mechanical properties, ultrasonic wave velocity, resonance frequency, and electrical resistivity values of the produced concrete were determined at the 7, 28, and 90 days. Besides, the specimens were subjected to gradually increased compressive loads and non-destructive methods were used to estimate the extent of damage on specimens. It was attempted to establish a relationship between the damage on concrete specimens and the results obtained by non-destructive methods. Consequently, the compressive strength, electrical resistivity, ultrasonic pulse velocity and resonance frequency values of all specimens increased with the advancing age. It was concluded that the resonant frequency method is more successful than other methods in estimating the amount of damage in concrete.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKÇA, B., KESKİN, S. B., GÖÇÜGENCİ, A. (2021). Predictability of concrete damage level by non-destructive test methods. Challenge Journal of Concrete Research Letters, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 4, 138–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/401355

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. ACI 211.1-91 (2002). Standard Practice for Selecting Proportions for Normal Heavyweight, and Mass Concrete. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA. ACI 228.2R-98 (1998). Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of Concrete in Structures. American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA. ASTM C39 / C39M-21 (2021). Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. ASTM C192 / C192M-14 (2014). Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. ASTM C215-08 (2008). Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse, Longitudinal, and Torsional Frequencies of Concrete Specimens. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. ASTM C597-97 (1997). Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA. Bem DH, Lima DPB, Mederios-Junior RA (2018). Effect of chemical admixtures on concrete´ s electrical resistivity. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36 (1), 174-187.
  2. Breysse D (2012). Non-Destructive Assessment of Concrete Structures: Reliability and Limits of Single and Combined Techniques. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherland. Chun P, Ujike I, Mishima K, Kusumoto M, Okazaki S (2020). Random Forest-based evaluation technique for internal damage in reinforced concrete featuring multiple nondestructive testing results. Construction and Building Materials, 253, 119238. Demirboğa R, Türkmen İ, Karakoç MB (2004). Relationship between ultrasonic velocity and compressive strength for high-volume mineraladmixtured concrete. Cement and Concrete Research, 34, 2329-2336.
  3. Duan P, Shui Z, Chen W, Shen C (2013). Efficiency of mineral admixtures in concrete: Microstructure, compressive strength and stability of hydrate phases. Applied Clay Science, 83-84, 115-121.
  4. Duran-Herrera A, De-León-Esquivel J, Bentz DP, Valdez-Tamez P (2019). Self-compacting concretes using fly ash and fine limestone powder: Shrinkage and surface electrical resistivity of equivalent mortars. Construction and Building Materials, 199, 50-62.
  5. Ferreira RM, Jalali S (2010). NDT measurements for the prediction of 28-day compressive strength. NDT&E International, 43, 55-61.
  6. Gastaldini ALG, Isaia GC, Hoppe TF, Missau F, Saciloto AP (2009). Influence of the use of rice husk ash on the electrical resistivity of concrete: A technical and economic feasibility