KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Artificial Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Yu Zhe LI
Piao SUN
Dong CHEN
Li TANG
Chun Hui CHEN
Ai-Min WU
Sayfa
1–10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, there was no clinical significance regarding bloodloss, work status, and reoperation rate between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Our current updated meta-analysis suggests that TDR could be an alternative treatment for LDDD, since it yieldedbetter clinical success and patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stay and operative time, less pain, and lower complication ratesthan lumbar fusion.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:AIM: To conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between total disc replacement(TDR) and fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD).MATERIAL and METHODS: We comprehensively searched meta-analyses comparing TDR with fusion through the PubMed,Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The end of theretrieval time was June 2017.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, there was no clinical significance regarding bloodloss, work status, and reoperation rate between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Our current updated meta-analysis suggests that TDR could be an alternative treatment for LDDD, since it yieldedbetter clinical success and patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stay and operative time, less pain, and lower complication ratesthan lumbar fusion.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

AIM: To conduct an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety between total disc replacement(TDR) and fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative disc disease (LDDD).MATERIAL and METHODS: We comprehensively searched meta-analyses comparing TDR with fusion through the PubMed,Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected and collected. The end of theretrieval time was June 2017. Two authors independently extracted the data from the studies after assessing their quality. Thestatistical software STATA version 12.0 was used to analyze the data.RESULTS: A total of seven RCTs (1706 patients) were included in our analysis. The patients in the TDR group had significantlyimproved. A greater percentage of these patients were satisfied with the surgery concerning Oswestry disability index, visual analogscale score, and complication rate. In addition, the clinical success in the TDR group was greater than that in the fusion group.Meanwhile, the TDR group had shorter operative time and hospital stay. However, there was no clinical significance regarding bloodloss, work status, and reoperation rate between the two groups.CONCLUSION: Our current updated meta-analysis suggests that TDR could be an alternative treatment for LDDD, since it yieldedbetter clinical success and patient satisfaction, shorter hospital stay and operative time, less pain, and lower complication ratesthan lumbar fusion.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LI, Y. Z., SUN, P., CHEN, D., TANG, L., CHEN, C. H., WU, A. (2020). Artificial Total Disc Replacement Versus Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease: An Update Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 1–10. https://ajindex.com/articles/399185

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Bao QB, Songer M, Pimenta L, Werner D, Reyes-Sanchez A, Balsano M, et al: Nubac disc arthroplasty: Preclinical studies and preliminary safety and efficacy evaluations. SAS Journal 1(1):36-45, 2007 2. Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, Nicol M, Hughes J, Smith F, et al: The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: A preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings. Spine 32(6):685-690, 2007 3. Beatty S: We need to talk about lumbar total disc replacement. International Journal of Spine Surgery 2:201-240, 2018 4. Berg S, Fritzell P, Tropp H: Sex life and sexual function in men and women before and after total disc replacement compared with posterior lumbar fusion. Spine Journal 12:987-994, 2009 5. Berg S, Tropp HT, Leivseth G: Disc height and motion patterns in the lumbar spine in patients operated with total disc replacement or fusion for discogenic back pain. Results from a randomized controlled trial. Spine Journal 11(11):991-998, 2011 6. Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, Hochschuler SH, Geisler FH, Holt RT, et al: A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: Part I: evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30(14):1565-1575; discussion E387-391, 2005 7. Blumenthal SL, Zigler JE, Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD: Anterior re-operation at the same level following lumbar total disc replacement. Spine Journal 9:S11-12, 2010 8. Bono CM, Kadaba M, Vaccaro AR: Posterior pedicle fixationbased dynamic stabilization devices for the treatment of degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine. Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques 22(5):376-383, 2009 9. Brantigan JW, Neidre A, Toohey JS: The lumbar I/F cage for posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the variable screw placement system: 10-year results of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Spine Journal 4(6):681-688, 2004 10. Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC: Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion. Spine 32(23):2551-2557, 2007 11. Delamarter R, Zigler JE, Balderston RA, Cammisa FP, Goldstein JA, Spivak JM: Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement compared with circumferential arthrodesis for the treatment of twolevel lumbar degenerative disc disease: Results at twentyfou