Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

The Relationship between R&D Expenditures, Patent Applications and Growth: A Dynamic Panel Causality Analysis for OECD Countries

Sayfa
39–48
Yayın Tarihi
2016-04-25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Hence, on the ground of these results, it can be argued that it is important for the countries aiming to achieve a sustainable and high rate of growth to allocate more resources for R&D activities and establish an efficient patent system.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The causality relationship of economic growth with R&D expenditures and patent applications for the 23 OECD member countries is investigated in this study by utilising from the data belonging the period of 1996-2011.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To that aim, GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) approach developed by Arellano-Bond (1991) and Wald test are used.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Hence, on the ground of these results, it can be argued that it is important for the countries aiming to achieve a sustainable and high rate of growth to allocate more resources for R&D activities and establish an efficient patent system.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:R&D Expenditures · Patent Applications · Growth

Özet

The causality relationship of economic growth with R&D expenditures and patent applications for the 23 OECD member countries is investigated in this study by utilising from the data belonging the period of 1996-2011. To that aim, GMM (Generalized Method of Moments) approach developed by Arellano-Bond (1991) and Wald test are used. Panel causality estimation results put forth a two-way and positive causality between R&D expenditures and economic growth, and a one-way and positive causality from patent applications to economic growth. Hence, on the ground of these results, it can be argued that it is important for the countries aiming to achieve a sustainable and high rate of growth to allocate more resources for R&D activities and establish an efficient patent system.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Türedi, A. P. D. S. (2016). The Relationship between R&D Expenditures, Patent Applications and Growth: A Dynamic Panel Causality Analysis for OECD Countries. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 39–48. https://ajindex.com/articles/397425

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Ayhan, A. (2002). Dünden Bugüne Türkiye’de Bilim ve Teknoloji ve Geleceğin Teknolojileri. İstanbul:
  2. Beta Yayınevi.
  3. Akçay, S. (2011). Toplam Ar-Ge Yatırımları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasında Nedensellik ilişkisi: Amerika Birleşik Devletlerinden Kanıt. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (1), 79-92.
  4. Akıncı, M., Sevinç, H. (2013). Ar-Ge Harcamaları ile Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki İlişki: 1990 – 2011 Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6 (27), 7-17.
  5. Altın, O., Kaya, A. (2009). Türkiye’de Ar-Ge Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme Arasındaki Nedensel İlişkinin Analizi. Ege Akademik Bakış, 9 (1), 251- 259. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and An Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (2), 277-297.
  6. Bai, J., Ng, S. (2004). A Panic Attack on Unit Roots and Cointegration. Econometrica, 72 (4), 1127-1178.
  7. Baltagi, H. B. (2007). Comments on Panel Data Analysis-Advantage and Challenges. Test 16 (1), 28-30.
  8. Braconier, H. (2000). Do Higher Per Capita Incomes Lead to More R&D Expenditure?, Review of Development Economics, 4 (3), 244–257.
  9. Breuer, B., McNown, R., Wallace, M. (2002). Series- Specific Unit Root Test with Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 64, 527-546.
  10. Breusch, T. S., Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Applications to Model Specifications Tests in Econometrics. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 239-253.
  11. Choi, I. (2001). Unit Root Tests for Panel Data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20, 249-272.
  12. Crosby, M. (2000).
  13. Patents, Innovation and Growth. The Economic Record, 16 (234), 255-262.
  14. Gengenbach, C., Palm, F. C., Urbain, J. P. (2010). Panel Unit Root Tests in the Presence of Cross-Sectional Dependencies: Comparison and Implications for Modelling. Econometric Reviews, 29 (2), 111-145.
  15. Gittleman, M., Wol, E. N. (1995). R&D Activity and Cross Country Growth Comparisons. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 189-207.
  16. Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E. (1994). Endogenous Innovation in the eory of Growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 23-44.
  17. Guo, Y., Wang, B. (2013). Study on the Economic Growth of Patent Output in the Hightech Industry. Journal of Management and Sustainability, 3 (1), 103-107.
  18. Gyekye, A. B., Oseifuah, E. K., Quarshie, V. (2012). The Impact of Research and Development on Socio-Economic Development: Perspectives from Selected Developing Economies. J