KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Medicine Science / 2021 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of clinical and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent early postoperative rehabilitation and cast immobilization after Achilles tendon repair

Turan Bilge KIZKAPAN
Sinan OĞUZKAYA
Gökay EKEN
Seçkin BAŞILGAN
Sayfa
732–736
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Both postoperative treatment protocols can be used safely whereas clinical outcomes of EPR after open AT repair are superior to immobilization, and we recommend EPR after surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative rehabilitation (EPR) and six weeks cast immobilization protocols after Achilles tendon (AT) repair. 44 patients who underwent AT repair for acute rupture were included in the study. 25 patients in Group 1 underwent six weeks cast immobilization, and 19 patients in Group 2 underwent early rehabilitation following surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Demographic findings, other systemic diseases, the time duration between injury and surgery, follow-up time, complications, time to return to work, re-rupture, injury mechanism, AOFAS, ATRS, and SF-36 subscales were all evaluated.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Both postoperative treatment protocols can be used safely whereas clinical outcomes of EPR after open AT repair are superior to immobilization, and we recommend EPR after surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The aim of this study is to compare early postoperative rehabilitation (EPR) and six weeks cast immobilization protocols after Achilles tendon (AT) repair. 44 patients who underwent AT repair for acute rupture were included in the study. 25 patients in Group 1 underwent six weeks cast immobilization, and 19 patients in Group 2 underwent early rehabilitation following surgery. Demographic findings, other systemic diseases, the time duration between injury and surgery, follow-up time, complications, time to return to work, re-rupture, injury mechanism, AOFAS, ATRS, and SF-36 subscales were all evaluated. The mean follow-up period was 10.7 ± 2.50 (range 7 to 19) months. Return to work time and the number of complications was significantly higher in Group 1 (p<0.001, 0.043 respectively). Mean AOFAS and ATRS scores of Group 2 were significantly higher than Group 1 (p=0.005, p=0.022 respectively). Two of the SF-36 subscales (physical functioning and role limitations due to physical health) were significantly better in Group 2 than Group 1 (p=0.025, p=0.022 respectively). Both postoperative treatment protocols can be used safely whereas clinical outcomes of EPR after open AT repair are superior to immobilization, and we recommend EPR after surgical repair of Achilles tendon ruptures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KIZKAPAN, T. B., OĞUZKAYA, S., EKEN, G., BAŞILGAN, S. (2021). Comparison of clinical and quality of life outcomes of patients who underwent early postoperative rehabilitation and cast immobilization after Achilles tendon repair. Medicine Science, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 732–736. https://ajindex.com/articles/391422

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Gross CE, Nunley, JA. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:233-9.
  2. Rhiaz JK, Khan RH, Fick D. Treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;87:2202-10.
  3. Yang, X, Meng, H, Quan, Q, et al. Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a review. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7:561-9.
  4. Okoroha KR, Ussef N, Jildeh TR, et al. Comparison of tendon lengthening with traditional versus accelerated rehabilitation after Achilles tendon repair: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48:1720-6.
  5. Majewski M, Schaeren S, Kohlhaas U, et al. Postoperative rehabilitation after percutaneous Achilles tendon repair: Early functional therapy versus cast immobilization. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1726-32.
  6. Suchak AA, Bostick GP, Beaupré L A, et al. The influence of early weightbearing compared with non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. JBJS. 2008;90:1876-83.
  7. Speck M, Klaue K. Early full weight bearing and functional treatment after surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Am J Sports Med. 1998;26:789-93.
  8. Jielile J, Badalihan A, Qianman B, et al. Clinical outcome of exercise therapy and early postoperative rehabilitation for treatment of neglected Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:2148-55.
  9. Barfod KW., Hansen MS, Hölmich P, et al. Efficacy of early controlled motion of the ankle compared with immobilisation in non-operative treatment of patients with an acute Achilles tendon rupture: an assessorblinded, randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54:719-24.
  10. Krackow KA, Thomas SC, Jones LC. Ligament-tendon fixation: analysisof a new stitch and comparison with standard techniques. Orthopedics. 1998;11:909-17.
  11. Mutlu EK, Celik D, Kilicoglu O, et al. The Turkish version of the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity. Knee Surg, Sports Traumatol, Arthrosc. 2015;23:2427-32.
  12. Akbaba YA, Celik D, Ogut RT. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity of Turkish version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016;55:1139- 42. Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF-36) in Turkish urban population. BMC public health. 2006;6:247. Suchak AA, Spooner C, Reid DC, et al. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols for Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat